The definitive guide to the "Global Warming" scam

[Crick]

The entire planet was shut down in 2020...resulting in a decrease of only 13%. And yet the left-wing imbeciles want a 50% decline in emissions.

Biden's Climate Denialism

Biden says the U.S. has a "moral imperative" to try to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 50% from 2005 levels by 2030.

www.dailysignal.com

The rate of decline is three times the rate we already did over the last 20 years.. IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO OBTAIN THIS RATE... We could stop using ALL fossil fuels today and not reach this level of reduction..

Billy... silly mistake. You seem to have confused emissions with atmospheric content. If we completely stopped burning fossil fuels today, our emissions would be very close to zero.

Billy Bob, are you coming back to fix this?

 

[P@triot]

Billy Bob, are you coming back to fix this?

Well, unfortunately, he is unable to fix your refusal to accept basic reality. I’ve posted all of the data and history has unequivocally proven that “Global Warming” is a scam. None of the left’s predictions have come to fruition.

 

[Crick]

The prediction that human additions to the atmosphere's CO2 content would continue to increase from the burning of fossil fuels? That, unfortunately, has come to fruition.
The prediction that increasing CO2 in the atmosphere would increase the Earth's temperature? That, unfortunately, has come to fruition.
The prediction that increased temperature of the atmosphere and the oceans would lead to an increase in severe weather events? That, unfortunately, has come to fruition.
The prediction that increased CO2 in the atmosphere would lead to the rapid acidification of the oceans which would interfere with calcite forming organisms and general reproductive biology? That, unfortunately, has come to fruition.
The prediction that increased temperatures would lead to increased melting at both poles and mass loss in Greenland and Antarctica, raising sea levels world wide? That, unfortunately, has come to fruition.
The prediction that increased temperatures would lead to distortions in seasonal timing affecting numerous predator-prey relationships and crop cycles? That, unfortunately, has come to fruition.
The prediction that fools like you would be willing to lie and deceive despite the irrationality and universally harmful results. That, unfortunately, has also come to fruition.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The prediction that human additions to the atmosphere's CO2 content would continue to increase from the burning of fossil fuels? That, unfortunately, has come to fruition.
The prediction that increasing CO2 in the atmosphere would increase the Earth's temperature? That, unfortunately, has come to fruition.
The prediction that increased temperature of the atmosphere and the oceans would lead to an increase in severe weather events? That, unfortunately, has come to fruition.
The prediction that increased CO2 in the atmosphere would lead to the rapid acidification of the oceans which would interfere with calcite forming organisms and general reproductive biology? That, unfortunately, has come to fruition.
The prediction that increased temperatures would lead to increased melting at both poles and mass loss in Greenland and Antarctica, raising sea levels world wide? That, unfortunately, has come to fruition.
The prediction that increased temperatures would lead to distortions in seasonal timing affecting numerous predator-prey relationships and crop cycles? That, unfortunately, has come to fruition.
The prediction that fools like you would be willing to lie and deceive despite the irrationality and universally harmful results. That, unfortunately, has also come to fruition.

Hey Crick,

Did you ever explain how "Mike's Nature Trick" made the data more accurate?

 

[P@triot]

The prediction that human additions to the atmosphere's CO2 content would continue to increase from the burning of fossil fuels?

That was never a "prediction", snowflake. Your comical predictions were shit like "New York City will be under water by 2015" and "the polar ice cap will be completely melted by 2014".

The fact that you're even lying about the predictions now shows that you know you got scammed, but your ego is too fragile to allow you to admit it.

 

[P@triot]

The prediction that increased temperature of the atmosphere and the oceans would lead to an increase in severe weather events?

Oh yeah? Name one, lying dill-hole. Volcanoes erupted in Pompeii like 4,000 years before the first automobile or factory.

Tornadoes and hurricanes were happening while dinosaurs roamed the planet. Same with earthquakes.

You cannot point to a single weather-event that man hasn't seen before. Not one.

 

[P@triot]

The prediction that human additions to the atmosphere's CO2 content would continue to increase from the burning of fossil fuels? That, unfortunately, has come to fruition.

And now we've come full-circle thanks to your pathological lying! Right back to the very first post which owned you. Unlike your bullshit post there, every single one of these bullet points have links. Thanks for playing, Crick!

The data is overwhelming. The history is indisputable. The lies have all been captured.

A study in the journal Nature Climate Change reviewed 117 climate predictions and found that 97.4% never materialized.

• Biologist Paul Ehrlich predicted in the 1970s that: “Population will inevitably and completely outstrip whatever small increases in food supplies we make,” and that “The death rate will increase until at least 100-200 million people per year will be starving to death during the next ten years.”
• In January 1970, Life reported, “Scientists have solid experimental and theoretical evidence to support…the following predictions: In a decade, urban dwellers will have to wear gas masks to survive air pollution…by 1985 air pollution will have reduced the amount of sunlight reaching earth by one half….”
• In January 2006 Al Gore predicted that we had ten years left before the planet turned into a “total frying pan.” We made it.
• In 2008, a segment aired on ABC News predicted that NYC would be under water by June 2015.
• In 1970, ecologist Kenneth E.F. Watt predicted that “If present trends continue, the world will be about four degrees colder for the global mean temperature in 1990, but 11 degrees colder by the year 2000, This is about twice what it would take to put us in an ice age.”
• In 2008, Al Gore predicted that there is a 75% chance that the entire north polar ice cap would be completely melted within 5-7 years. He at least hedged that prediction by giving himself “75%” certainty. By 2014 - the polar ice cap had expanded over 60% (more than 900,000 sq miles)
• On May 13th 2014 France’s foreign minister said that we only have 500 days to stop “climate chaos.” The recent Paris climate summit met 565 days after his remark.
• In 2009, National Aeronautics and Space Administration Goddard Space Flight Center head James Wassen warned that Obama only had four years left to save the earth.
• On the first Earth Day its sponsor warned that “in 25 years, somewhere between 75% and 80% of all the species of living animals will be extinct.”
• And another Earth Day prediction from Kenneth Watt: “At the present rate of nitrogen buildup, it’s only a matter of time before light will be filtered out of the atmosphere and none of our land will be usable.”

Top 10 Climate Change Predictions Gone Spectacularly Wrong; This Is EPIC!

 

[Crick]

The prediction that human additions to the atmosphere's CO2 content would continue to increase from the burning of fossil fuels? That, unfortunately, has come to fruition.

And now we've come full-circle thanks to your pathological lying! Right back to the very first post which owned you. Unlike your bullshit post there, every single one of these bullet points have links. Thanks for playing, Crick!

The data is overwhelming. The history is indisputable. The lies have all been captured.

A study in the journal Nature Climate Change reviewed 117 climate predictions and found that 97.4% never materialized.

• Biologist Paul Ehrlich predicted in the 1970s that: “Population will inevitably and completely outstrip whatever small increases in food supplies we make,” and that “The death rate will increase until at least 100-200 million people per year will be starving to death during the next ten years.”
• In January 1970, Life reported, “Scientists have solid experimental and theoretical evidence to support…the following predictions: In a decade, urban dwellers will have to wear gas masks to survive air pollution…by 1985 air pollution will have reduced the amount of sunlight reaching earth by one half….”
• In January 2006 Al Gore predicted that we had ten years left before the planet turned into a “total frying pan.” We made it.
• In 2008, a segment aired on ABC News predicted that NYC would be under water by June 2015.
• In 1970, ecologist Kenneth E.F. Watt predicted that “If present trends continue, the world will be about four degrees colder for the global mean temperature in 1990, but 11 degrees colder by the year 2000, This is about twice what it would take to put us in an ice age.”
• In 2008, Al Gore predicted that there is a 75% chance that the entire north polar ice cap would be completely melted within 5-7 years. He at least hedged that prediction by giving himself “75%” certainty. By 2014 - the polar ice cap had expanded over 60% (more than 900,000 sq miles)
• On May 13th 2014 France’s foreign minister said that we only have 500 days to stop “climate chaos.” The recent Paris climate summit met 565 days after his remark.
• In 2009, National Aeronautics and Space Administration Goddard Space Flight Center head James Wassen warned that Obama only had four years left to save the earth.
• On the first Earth Day its sponsor warned that “in 25 years, somewhere between 75% and 80% of all the species of living animals will be extinct.”
• And another Earth Day prediction from Kenneth Watt: “At the present rate of nitrogen buildup, it’s only a matter of time before light will be filtered out of the atmosphere and none of our land will be usable.”

Top 10 Climate Change Predictions Gone Spectacularly Wrong; This Is EPIC!

At the top of this post, you have a link that claims it will take us to "Nature Climate Change". It does not. It takes us to a 404 error at "The Western Journal". That explains a great deal as Nature would never have published crap like this list.

Prediction like these are most often provided to indicate what can happen if we do not change some behavior or practice of ours. If those things are changed, say, by the creation of the EPA, the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act, those predictions should not come true. That you should think such statements refute AGW is simply evidence of your ignorance on science in general and global warming in particular. To wit:

1) As you note, Paul Ehrlich was a biologist who had zero experience in climate science. The prediction you mention here concerns population growth, not global warming.
2) Life magazine was never a science publication and, in 1970, air pollution WAS a real threat that was successfully addressed by the creation of the EPA (created 12/02/1970), The :Clean Air Act (signed 12/31/1970) and several other pieces of legislation
3) Al Gore is not a climate scientist and "total frying pan" is obviously hyperbole.
4) ABC News is not a science resource. Sea level rise in 2008 reached an annual rate of 1 cm/year, much higher than its longer term averages.
5) Kenneth Watt, as you note, is an ecologist. There was some evidence that temperatures were dropping in 1970 and the news media picked up on such stories, but there was never a scientific consensus supporting an imminent ice age. That is why when you see this claim, it is almost always found in popular news publications and almost never found in peer reviewed science journals.
6) Again, Al Gore is not a climate scientist. The North Pole has shrunk and IS headed for an ice-free summer. The claim that it has expanded is cherry picked bullshit.
7) France's foreign minister is not a climate scientist.
8) The now-retired head of NASA's Goddard Center is named James Hansen. Hansen's climate predictions from 1985 are famous for their accuracy, even after 35 years.
9) The sponsors of Earth Day.... Are you seeing the trend here? You claim that climate scientists have made faulty predictions but then attempt to support your claim with shite like this.
10) Kenneth Watt, ecologist. Tell us Mr Patriot, how long is "...only a matter of time"?

So, you have no scientific predictions here, failed or otherwise. You LIED when you claimed this list came from "Nature, Climate Change". Very close to 100% of climate scientists accept AGW and agree that it is a threat that needs to be dealt with quickly and effectively. Your arguments here are pathetic bullshit.

 

[jc456]

The prediction you mention here concerns population growth, not global warming.

the fk it isn't about global warming. reduce population was exactly about that.

 

[jc456]

The prediction that human additions to the atmosphere's CO2 content would continue to increase from the burning of fossil fuels? That, unfortunately, has come to fruition.

And now we've come full-circle thanks to your pathological lying! Right back to the very first post which owned you. Unlike your bullshit post there, every single one of these bullet points have links. Thanks for playing, Crick!

The data is overwhelming. The history is indisputable. The lies have all been captured.

A study in the journal Nature Climate Change reviewed 117 climate predictions and found that 97.4% never materialized.

• Biologist Paul Ehrlich predicted in the 1970s that: “Population will inevitably and completely outstrip whatever small increases in food supplies we make,” and that “The death rate will increase until at least 100-200 million people per year will be starving to death during the next ten years.”
• In January 1970, Life reported, “Scientists have solid experimental and theoretical evidence to support…the following predictions: In a decade, urban dwellers will have to wear gas masks to survive air pollution…by 1985 air pollution will have reduced the amount of sunlight reaching earth by one half….”
• In January 2006 Al Gore predicted that we had ten years left before the planet turned into a “total frying pan.” We made it.
• In 2008, a segment aired on ABC News predicted that NYC would be under water by June 2015.
• In 1970, ecologist Kenneth E.F. Watt predicted that “If present trends continue, the world will be about four degrees colder for the global mean temperature in 1990, but 11 degrees colder by the year 2000, This is about twice what it would take to put us in an ice age.”
• In 2008, Al Gore predicted that there is a 75% chance that the entire north polar ice cap would be completely melted within 5-7 years. He at least hedged that prediction by giving himself “75%” certainty. By 2014 - the polar ice cap had expanded over 60% (more than 900,000 sq miles)
• On May 13th 2014 France’s foreign minister said that we only have 500 days to stop “climate chaos.” The recent Paris climate summit met 565 days after his remark.
• In 2009, National Aeronautics and Space Administration Goddard Space Flight Center head James Wassen warned that Obama only had four years left to save the earth.
• On the first Earth Day its sponsor warned that “in 25 years, somewhere between 75% and 80% of all the species of living animals will be extinct.”
• And another Earth Day prediction from Kenneth Watt: “At the present rate of nitrogen buildup, it’s only a matter of time before light will be filtered out of the atmosphere and none of our land will be usable.”

Top 10 Climate Change Predictions Gone Spectacularly Wrong; This Is EPIC!

At the top of this post, you have a link that claims it will take us to "Nature Climate Change". It does not. It takes us to a 404 error at "The Western Journal". That explains a great deal as Nature would never have published crap like this list.

Prediction like these are most often provided to indicate what can happen if we do not change some behavior or practice of ours. If those things are changed, say, by the creation of the EPA, the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act, those predictions should not come true. That you should think such statements refute AGW is simply evidence of your ignorance on science in general and global warming in particular. To wit:

1) As you note, Paul Ehrlich was a biologist who had zero experience in climate science. The prediction you mention here concerns population growth, not global warming.
2) Life magazine was never a science publication and, in 1970, air pollution WAS a real threat that was successfully addressed by the creation of the EPA (created 12/02/1970), The :Clean Air Act (signed 12/31/1970) and several other pieces of legislation
3) Al Gore is not a climate scientist and "total frying pan" is obviously hyperbole.
4) ABC News is not a science resource. Sea level rise in 2008 reached an annual rate of 1 cm/year, much higher than its longer term averages.
5) Kenneth Watt, as you note, is an ecologist. There was some evidence that temperatures were dropping in 1970 and the news media picked up on such stories, but there was never a scientific consensus supporting an imminent ice age. That is why when you see this claim, it is almost always found in popular news publications and almost never found in peer reviewed science journals.
6) Again, Al Gore is not a climate scientist. The North Pole has shrunk and IS headed for an ice-free summer. The claim that it has expanded is cherry picked bullshit.
7) France's foreign minister is not a climate scientist.
8) The now-retired head of NASA's Goddard Center is named James Hansen. Hansen's climate predictions from 1985 are famous for their accuracy, even after 35 years.
9) The sponsors of Earth Day.... Are you seeing the trend here? You claim that climate scientists have made faulty predictions but then attempt to support your claim with shite like this.
10) Kenneth Watt, ecologist. Tell us Mr Patriot, how long is "...only a matter of time"?

So, you have no scientific predictions here, failed or otherwise. You LIED when you claimed this list came from "Nature, Climate Change". Very close to 100% of climate scientists accept AGW and agree that it is a threat that needs to be dealt with quickly and effectively. Your arguments here are pathetic bullshit.

neither was Al Gore a climate scientist, did you listen to him?

 

[Crick]

Poster P@triot has lied to us. You still listen to him. Why?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Poster P@triot has lied to us. You still listen to him. Why?

Did you ever explain how "Mike's Nature Trick" made the data more accurate?

 

[Crick]

Poster P@triot has lied to us. You still listen to him. Why?

Did you ever explain how "Mike's Nature Trick" made the data more accurate?

Yes I did. Did you miss it?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Poster P@triot has lied to us. You still listen to him. Why?

Did you ever explain how "Mike's Nature Trick" made the data more accurate?

Yes I did. Did you miss it?

I missed it.
Can you post your explanation again?

 

[P@triot]

At the top of this post, you have a link that claims it will take us to "Nature Climate Change". It does not. It takes us to a 404 error at "The Western Journal". That explains a great deal as Nature would never have published crap like this list.

Because - like almost all sites - they don’t keep every page they ever posted, up and available. But you already knew that. You’re just desperate to keep the scam you were duped into believing, going.

I saw the article on Nature Climate Change myself when it was first posted. It was 100% real and accurate. Thanks for playing.

 

[P@triot]

Prediction like these are most often provided to indicate what can happen if we do not change some behavior or practice of ours.

Bwahahaha! So what exactly did we do that prevented NYC from being under water in 2015 or the polar ice cap completely melting by 2014?

If those things are changed, say, by the creation of the EPA, the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act, those predictions should not come true.

Those were all in place 45 years before the predictions that have resulted in “Global Warming” being proven as a scam. Would you like to try again?

Your inability to provide even a single example of something drastic we did to prevent any of those predictions from coming to fruition is duly noted.

That you should think such statements refute AGW is simply evidence of your ignorance on science in general and global warming in particular.

So because I accept historical facts (the polar ice cap expanded, NYC isn’t under water), I’m “ignorant”. If that isn’t vintage left-wing “logic”, I don’t know what is!

 

[P@triot]

1) As you note, Paul Ehrlich was a biologist who had zero experience in climate science. The prediction you mention here concerns population growth, not global warming.

Aaaand your point would be??? Hell, at least a Paul Ehrlich was in some field of the sciences. Al Gore doesn’t even have that much on his resume and you left-wing lunatics push every lie he creates.

Because this one article so thoroughly defeats your lies, your best argument at this point is “you shouldn’t listen to the people on the left who made these predictions because they weren’t climate scientists”.

Yeah, no shit. That’s the point of the entire thread! The left has unqualified idiots pushing pure bullshit 24x7.

 

[P@triot]

6) Again, Al Gore is not a climate scientist.

And yet, you left-lunatics have made him your “Global Warming” messiah! Since he’s not a scientist, how come everyone on the left isn’t telling him to sit the fuck down and shut the fuck up? Oh yeah, because he’s peddling the propaganda you guys need.

The North Pole has shrunk and IS headed for an ice-free summer. The claim that it has expanded is cherry picked bullshit.

Oh snowflake….it’s not a “claim”. It is a fact as proven by NASA satellites. Even left-wing NASA had no choice but to admit it. A 60% expansion (over 900,000 sq miles) is the complete opposite of what you liars “predicted”. No science could ever be that wrong. It’s literally impossible.

 

[mamooth]

6) Again, Al Gore is not a climate scientist.

And yet, you left-lunatics have made him your “Global Warming” messiah!

Don't project your side's tendency for hero-worship on to us. Gore isn't a scientist, so we don't talk about him.. Also don't project your weird sexual proclivities on to us. You clearly have a massive mancrush on the Gorebod. It's best not to speculate why.

Anyways, Gore Rule invoked. Any time some cultist invokes Gore, he forfeits the thread for his side. Those who can, they talk about the science. Those who can't, they run and deflect by raving about Gore. That's you doing that. Thanks for playing, we have some lovely parting gifts for you, including the USMB home game.

Oh snowflake….it’s not a “claim”. It is a fact as proven by NASA satellites. Even left-wing NASA had no choice but to admit it. A 60% expansion (over 900,000 sq miles) is the complete opposite of what you liars “predicted”. No science could ever be that wrong. It’s literally impossible.

This simple graphic illustrates how you're lying-by-cherrypicking.

Oh, one more thing.

Because - like almost all sites - they don’t keep every page they ever posted, up and available. But you already knew that. You’re just desperate to keep the scam you were duped into believing, going.

Except your link doesn't even go to _Nature Climate Change_, which is a premier journal of peer-reviewed science. It goes to something called _The Western Journal_, which is a right-wing conspiracy website. Yet you claimed it went to the former. Lied, you did. No, _Nature Climate Change_ would not be posting a crazy gish gallop of crap. If you disagree, find the actual paper and post it. You made the claim, so it's up to you to back it up.

We all know what happened. Being that you're a brainless propaganda parrot, you blindly cut-and-paste something from a conspiracy website, and you didn't look at the links. You just _believed_. We also know you're a pouting manchild who can't admit to any mistake, so you won't admit to your mistake. Instead, you'll keep doubling down on your stupid, graduating it to deliberate dishonesty.

Please proceed.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

6) Again, Al Gore is not a climate scientist.

And yet, you left-lunatics have made him your “Global Warming” messiah!

Don't project your side's tendency for hero-worship on to us. Gore isn't a scientist, so we don't talk about him.. Also don't project your weird sexual proclivities on to us. You clearly have a massive mancrush on the Gorebod. It's best not to speculate why.

Anyways, Gore Rule invoked. Any time some cultist invokes Gore, he forfeits the thread for his side. Those who can, they talk about the science. Those who can't, they run and deflect by raving about Gore. That's you doing that. Thanks for playing, we have some lovely parting gifts for you, including the USMB home game.

Oh snowflake….it’s not a “claim”. It is a fact as proven by NASA satellites. Even left-wing NASA had no choice but to admit it. A 60% expansion (over 900,000 sq miles) is the complete opposite of what you liars “predicted”. No science could ever be that wrong. It’s literally impossible.

This simple graphic illustrates how you're lying-by-cherrypicking.

Oh, one more thing.

Because - like almost all sites - they don’t keep every page they ever posted, up and available. But you already knew that. You’re just desperate to keep the scam you were duped into believing, going.

Except your link doesn't even go to _Nature Climate Change_, which is a premier journal of peer-reviewed science. It goes to something called _The Western Journal_, which is a right-wing conspiracy website. Yet you claimed it went to the former. Lied, you did. No, _Nature Climate Change_ would not be posting a crazy gish gallop of crap. If you disagree, find the actual paper and post it. You made the claim, so it's up to you to back it up.

We all know what happened. Being that you're a brainless propaganda parrot, you blindly cut-and-paste something from a conspiracy website, and you didn't look at the links. You just _believed_. We also know you're a pouting manchild who can't admit to any mistake, so you won't admit to your mistake. Instead, you'll keep doubling down on your stupid, graduating it to deliberate dishonesty.

Please proceed.

This simple graphic illustrates how you're lying-by-cherrypicking.

Why does your chart start in 1980?