The courts should have taken on the voter fraud issue.

kyzr

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2009
Messages
17,649
Reaction score
8,999
Points
1,255
Location
The AL part of PA
Trump's hand picked AG said there was no sizable voter fraud.
All Barr had to do was issue a report of what was investigated and what the findings were.
That said, the GOP got outplayed in GA. The Consent Decree was a coup for Stacy Abrams, as well as he sister's ruling on pruning ineligible voters from the rolls.
The GOP legislatures need to tighten-up voting laws or the dems will swamp every election with bogus mail-in votes.
 

IM2

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2015
Messages
44,620
Reaction score
10,445
Points
2,070
The courts did. 60 times. And they saw no proof.
There is election fraud every election

They should have publicity allowed the evidence to be presented, be documented, and let the people decide from there.

Were they scared of some evidence being presented I wonder?
The evidence was presented.
 

surada

Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2021
Messages
5,146
Reaction score
2,846
Points
893
The courts should NOT have dismissed the voter fraud cases. They should have allowed them to approach the courts and with transparency show the American people it was either a concern or invalid.

They should have done this knowing if they did not, the nation would remain divided forever.

But perhaps this is what they really wanted all along.

And God forbid any of it might have gone Trumps way. That would have been unacceptable.
Of course they should.. Trump just had to provide some evidence to back up his accusations.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: IM2

IM2

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2015
Messages
44,620
Reaction score
10,445
Points
2,070
Trump's hand picked AG said there was no sizable voter fraud.
All Barr had to do was issue a report of what was investigated and what the findings were.
That said, the GOP got outplayed in GA. The Consent Decree was a coup for Stacy Abrams, as well as he sister's ruling on pruning ineligible voters from the rolls.
The GOP legislatures need to tighten-up voting laws or the dems will swamp every election with bogus mail-in votes.
None of this is true.
 

surada

Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2021
Messages
5,146
Reaction score
2,846
Points
893
Trump's hand picked AG said there was no sizable voter fraud.
All Barr had to do was issue a report of what was investigated and what the findings were.
That said, the GOP got outplayed in GA. The Consent Decree was a coup for Stacy Abrams, as well as he sister's ruling on pruning ineligible voters from the rolls.
The GOP legislatures need to tighten-up voting laws or the dems will swamp every election with bogus mail-in votes.
Georgia registered over 300,000 new voters last year.. The usual purges of people who died or moved away or didn't vote for several election cycles are routine .. Trump is probably too stupid to know that. How about you?

I have been voting by mail for over a decade.. What's your problem? Do you want to take the vote away from US citizens?
 

IM2

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2015
Messages
44,620
Reaction score
10,445
Points
2,070
Just face the truth republicans. Trump lost the popular vote in 2016. So why do you think he could win this time? He did a shitty job as president. He lost because of his performace. He got fired. There was no cheating or big time fraud. He got his ass whipped by Biden and he could not deal with the public embarrassment. So he made up a story about fraud knowing he could get you idiots stirred up. Trump played you and you guys are gping to pay off his debt for him.
 

Care4all

Warrior Princess
Joined
Mar 24, 2007
Messages
57,460
Reaction score
15,778
Points
2,220
Location
Maine
The courts should NOT have dismissed the voter fraud cases. They should have allowed them to approach the courts and with transparency show the American people it was either a concern or invalid.

They should have done this knowing if they did not, the nation would remain divided forever.

But perhaps this is what they really wanted all along.

And God forbid any of it might have gone Trumps way. That would have been unacceptable.
Oh silly one, the courts did take it on...

You just are listening to fake news...

And your FAKE media, counted on you believing what they were saying, and not actually read all the court cases and what and why the judges ruled t h e way they did...

The State and federal courts didn't just say out of the clear blue, a case didn't have standing, or dismissed or denied....everything submitted was reviewed, state constitutions and election laws were reviewed, evidence presented was reviewed, all before the judges came to their rulings and they explained thoroughly why they ruled the way they did....
 

surada

Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2021
Messages
5,146
Reaction score
2,846
Points
893
The courts should NOT have dismissed the voter fraud cases. They should have allowed them to approach the courts and with transparency show the American people it was either a concern or invalid.

They should have done this knowing if they did not, the nation would remain divided forever.

But perhaps this is what they really wanted all along.

And God forbid any of it might have gone Trumps way. That would have been unacceptable.
Oh silly one, the courts did take it on...

You just are listening to fake news...

And your FAKE media, counted on you believing what they were saying, and NOT WE to actually read all the court cases and what and why the judges ruled t h e way they did...

The State and federal courts didn't just say out of the clear blue, a case didn't have standing, or dismissed or denied....everything submitted was reviewed, state constitutions and election laws were reviewed, evidence presented was reviewed, all before the judges came to their rulings and they explained thoroughly why they ruled the way they did....
Votto

Sometimes desperation makes people extremely stupid. Why didn't Trump produce any evidence?
 
OP
Votto

Votto

Platinum Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Messages
27,613
Reaction score
11,240
Points
940
The courts should NOT have dismissed the voter fraud cases. They should have allowed them to approach the courts and with transparency show the American people it was either a concern or invalid.

They should have done this knowing if they did not, the nation would remain divided forever.

But perhaps this is what they really wanted all along.

And God forbid any of it might have gone Trumps way. That would have been unacceptable.
Oh silly one, the courts did take it on...

You just are listening to fake news...

And your FAKE media, counted on you believing what they were saying, and not actually read all the court cases and what and why the judges ruled t h e way they did...

The State and federal courts didn't just say out of the clear blue, a case didn't have standing, or dismissed or denied....everything submitted was reviewed, state constitutions and election laws were reviewed, evidence presented was reviewed, all before the judges came to their rulings and they explained thoroughly why they ruled the way they did....
I reckon it all comes down to what media sources you want to believe.

Do you believe the ones that spouted Trump was a Putin puppet for the last 4 years with a full investigation that resulted in nothing, or do you believe the ones that said there was voter fraud, for which no one will investigate?

But then, now that news sources are being censored, now everyone only has your news sources, so now maybe everyone will start to believe the same thing.

In fact, I bet you still believe Trump is a Putin spy, don't you.
 

Care4all

Warrior Princess
Joined
Mar 24, 2007
Messages
57,460
Reaction score
15,778
Points
2,220
Location
Maine
The courts should NOT have dismissed the voter fraud cases. They should have allowed them to approach the courts and with transparency show the American people it was either a concern or invalid.

They should have done this knowing if they did not, the nation would remain divided forever.

But perhaps this is what they really wanted all along.

And God forbid any of it might have gone Trumps way. That would have been unacceptable.
Oh silly one, the courts did take it on...

You just are listening to fake news...

And your FAKE media, counted on you believing what they were saying, and NOT WE to actually read all the court cases and what and why the judges ruled t h e way they did...

The State and federal courts didn't just say out of the clear blue, a case didn't have standing, or dismissed or denied....everything submitted was reviewed, state constitutions and election laws were reviewed, evidence presented was reviewed, all before the judges came to their rulings and they explained thoroughly why they ruled the way they did....
Votto

Sometimes desperation makes people extremely stupid. Why didn't Trump produce any evidence?
In some cases Giuliani presented his evidence, but it was laughed out of court....He had to admit in court he wasn't showing or claiming evidence of fraud....

But a lot of these court cases that they lost were Trump supporters in states, suing the STATE because of procedures they thought were unfair or unconstitutional.
 

surada

Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2021
Messages
5,146
Reaction score
2,846
Points
893
The courts should NOT have dismissed the voter fraud cases. They should have allowed them to approach the courts and with transparency show the American people it was either a concern or invalid.

They should have done this knowing if they did not, the nation would remain divided forever.

But perhaps this is what they really wanted all along.

And God forbid any of it might have gone Trumps way. That would have been unacceptable.
Oh silly one, the courts did take it on...

You just are listening to fake news...

And your FAKE media, counted on you believing what they were saying, and not actually read all the court cases and what and why the judges ruled t h e way they did...

The State and federal courts didn't just say out of the clear blue, a case didn't have standing, or dismissed or denied....everything submitted was reviewed, state constitutions and election laws were reviewed, evidence presented was reviewed, all before the judges came to their rulings and they explained thoroughly why they ruled the way they did....
I reckon it all comes down to what media sources you want to believe.

Do you believe the ones that spouted Trump was a Putin puppet for the last 4 years with a full investigation that resulted in nothing, or do you believe the ones that said there was voter fraud, for which no one will investigate?

But then, now that news sources are being censored, now everyone only has your news sources, so now maybe everyone will start to believe the same thing.

In fact, I bet you still believe Trump is a Putin spy, don't you.
Probably not. Trump is not smart enough to be a Russian asset. Putin wouldn't trust him not to shoot off his mouth if he needed an attention fix.
 

kyzr

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2009
Messages
17,649
Reaction score
8,999
Points
1,255
Location
The AL part of PA
Trump's hand picked AG said there was no sizable voter fraud.
All Barr had to do was issue a report of what was investigated and what the findings were.
That said, the GOP got outplayed in GA. The Consent Decree was a coup for Stacy Abrams, as well as he sister's ruling on pruning ineligible voters from the rolls.
The GOP legislatures need to tighten-up voting laws or the dems will swamp every election with bogus mail-in votes.
Georgia registered over 300,000 new voters last year.. The usual purges of people who died or moved away or didn't vote for several election cycles are routine .. Trump is probably too stupid to know that. How about you?

I have been voting by mail for over a decade.. What's your problem? Do you want to take the vote away from US citizens?
1. When the Post Office says you moved, you moved. Except in GA, just ask Abram's sister.
2. Agree Stacy Abrams outworked the stupid Republicans. Doug Collins should not have run against Loeffler in November.
3. My problem is that absentee ballots needs to be requested instead of mass mailed. Signatures need to be verified. Over-votes need to be corrected, and if any incorrect ballots are cured/corrected it should be allowed statewide, not just in cities.
4. Voter ID should be required.
5. We'll see if Warnock wins again in 2022.
 

surada

Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2021
Messages
5,146
Reaction score
2,846
Points
893
The courts should NOT have dismissed the voter fraud cases. They should have allowed them to approach the courts and with transparency show the American people it was either a concern or invalid.

They should have done this knowing if they did not, the nation would remain divided forever.

But perhaps this is what they really wanted all along.

And God forbid any of it might have gone Trumps way. That would have been unacceptable.
Oh silly one, the courts did take it on...

You just are listening to fake news...

And your FAKE media, counted on you believing what they were saying, and NOT WE to actually read all the court cases and what and why the judges ruled t h e way they did...

The State and federal courts didn't just say out of the clear blue, a case didn't have standing, or dismissed or denied....everything submitted was reviewed, state constitutions and election laws were reviewed, evidence presented was reviewed, all before the judges came to their rulings and they explained thoroughly why they ruled the way they did....
Votto

Sometimes desperation makes people extremely stupid. Why didn't Trump produce any evidence?
In some cases Giuliani presented his evidence, but it was laughed out of court....He had to admit in court he wasn't showing or claiming evidence of fraud....

But a lot of these court cases that they lost were Trump supporters in states, suing the STATE because of procedures they thought were unfair or unconstitutional.
What evidence did Rudy produce? At this point Trump is attacking Rudy for "misleading" him on voter fraud.
 
OP
Votto

Votto

Platinum Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Messages
27,613
Reaction score
11,240
Points
940
The courts should NOT have dismissed the voter fraud cases. They should have allowed them to approach the courts and with transparency show the American people it was either a concern or invalid.

They should have done this knowing if they did not, the nation would remain divided forever.

But perhaps this is what they really wanted all along.

And God forbid any of it might have gone Trumps way. That would have been unacceptable.
Oh silly one, the courts did take it on...

You just are listening to fake news...

And your FAKE media, counted on you believing what they were saying, and not actually read all the court cases and what and why the judges ruled t h e way they did...

The State and federal courts didn't just say out of the clear blue, a case didn't have standing, or dismissed or denied....everything submitted was reviewed, state constitutions and election laws were reviewed, evidence presented was reviewed, all before the judges came to their rulings and they explained thoroughly why they ruled the way they did....
I reckon it all comes down to what media sources you want to believe.

Do you believe the ones that spouted Trump was a Putin puppet for the last 4 years with a full investigation that resulted in nothing, or do you believe the ones that said there was voter fraud, for which no one will investigate?

But then, now that news sources are being censored, now everyone only has your news sources, so now maybe everyone will start to believe the same thing.

In fact, I bet you still believe Trump is a Putin spy, don't you.
Probably not. Trump is not smart enough to be a Russian asset. Putin wouldn't trust him not to shoot off his mouth if he needed an attention fix.
It was strange, she thought, to obtain news by means of nothing but denials, as if existence had ceased, facts had vanished and only the frantic negatives uttered by officials and columnists gave any clue to the reality they were denying.

Atlas Shrugged, Ayn Rand, 1957


People from the past saw this coming.

Just read 1984 and you would think it was today.
 

surada

Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2021
Messages
5,146
Reaction score
2,846
Points
893
The courts should NOT have dismissed the voter fraud cases. They should have allowed them to approach the courts and with transparency show the American people it was either a concern or invalid.

They should have done this knowing if they did not, the nation would remain divided forever.

But perhaps this is what they really wanted all along.

And God forbid any of it might have gone Trumps way. That would have been unacceptable.
Oh silly one, the courts did take it on...

You just are listening to fake news...

And your FAKE media, counted on you believing what they were saying, and not actually read all the court cases and what and why the judges ruled t h e way they did...

The State and federal courts didn't just say out of the clear blue, a case didn't have standing, or dismissed or denied....everything submitted was reviewed, state constitutions and election laws were reviewed, evidence presented was reviewed, all before the judges came to their rulings and they explained thoroughly why they ruled the way they did....
I reckon it all comes down to what media sources you want to believe.

Do you believe the ones that spouted Trump was a Putin puppet for the last 4 years with a full investigation that resulted in nothing, or do you believe the ones that said there was voter fraud, for which no one will investigate?

But then, now that news sources are being censored, now everyone only has your news sources, so now maybe everyone will start to believe the same thing.

In fact, I bet you still believe Trump is a Putin spy, don't you.
Probably not. Trump is not smart enough to be a Russian asset. Putin wouldn't trust him not to shoot off his mouth if he needed an attention fix.
It was strange, she thought, to obtain news by means of nothing but denials, as if existence had ceased, facts had vanished and only the frantic negatives uttered by officials and columnists gave any clue to the reality they were denying.

Atlas Shrugged, Ayn Rand, 1957

People from the past saw this coming.

Just read 1984 and you would think it was today.
Nobody reads Ayn Rand after high school. She changed her politics as often as she changed underwear.. She was a screenwriter.
 

alang1216

Pragmatist
Joined
Jun 21, 2014
Messages
12,823
Reaction score
1,769
Points
245
Location
Virginia
The courts should NOT have dismissed the voter fraud cases. They should have allowed them to approach the courts and with transparency show the American people it was either a concern or invalid.

They should have done this knowing if they did not, the nation would remain divided forever.

But perhaps this is what they really wanted all along.

And God forbid any of it might have gone Trumps way. That would have been unacceptable.
Which voter fraud case was dismissed? So far as I know there were none. Do you actually know of a specific case or are you just parroting conspiracy theories you've heard?
 

NewsVine_Mariyam

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2018
Messages
4,681
Reaction score
1,949
Points
365
Location
The Beautiful Pacific Northwest
The courts should NOT have dismissed the voter fraud cases. They should have allowed them to approach the courts and with transparency show the American people it was either a concern or invalid.

They should have done this knowing if they did not, the nation would remain divided forever.

But perhaps this is what they really wanted all along.

And God forbid any of it might have gone Trumps way. That would have been unacceptable.
Oh silly one, the courts did take it on...

You just are listening to fake news...

And your FAKE media, counted on you believing what they were saying, and not actually read all the court cases and what and why the judges ruled t h e way they did...

The State and federal courts didn't just say out of the clear blue, a case didn't have standing, or dismissed or denied....everything submitted was reviewed, state constitutions and election laws were reviewed, evidence presented was reviewed, all before the judges came to their rulings and they explained thoroughly why they ruled the way they did....
I reckon it all comes down to what media sources you want to believe.

Do you believe the ones that spouted Trump was a Putin puppet for the last 4 years with a full investigation that resulted in nothing, or do you believe the ones that said there was voter fraud, for which no one will investigate?

But then, now that news sources are being censored, now everyone only has your news sources, so now maybe everyone will start to believe the same thing.

In fact, I bet you still believe Trump is a Putin spy, don't you.
Probably not. Trump is not smart enough to be a Russian asset. Putin wouldn't trust him not to shoot off his mouth if he needed an attention fix.
It was strange, she thought, to obtain news by means of nothing but denials, as if existence had ceased, facts had vanished and only the frantic negatives uttered by officials and columnists gave any clue to the reality they were denying.

Atlas Shrugged, Ayn Rand, 1957

People from the past saw this coming.

Just read 1984 and you would think it was today.
I'm curious, what age range are you in? Or if you would prefer, which was the first election you voted in?
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top