France doesn't allow mail-in voting due to voter fraud. The US needs to follow France's lead.Nope.All Barr had to do was issue a report of what was investigated and what the findings were.Trump's hand picked AG said there was no sizable voter fraud.
That said, the GOP got outplayed in GA. The Consent Decree was a coup for Stacy Abrams, as well as he sister's ruling on pruning ineligible voters from the rolls.
The GOP legislatures need to tighten-up voting laws or the dems will swamp every election with bogus mail-in votes.
Vote by mail needs to be expanded. Five states have done it for a while and there has never been anyone who claimed the elections were illegitimate and there hasn't been any greater fraud in those elections than the other 45 states. So no..
1. How do you know Durham found nothing? Why do you think Barr gave him Special Prosecutor status if there was no progress?Save us the conspiracy nonsense. You sound like one of the few Trumpers struggling to find truth in all this and you end up with watered down QAnon shit anyway.All Barr had to do was issue a report of what was investigated and what the findings were.Trump's hand picked AG said there was no sizable voter fraud.
That said, the GOP got outplayed in GA. The Consent Decree was a coup for Stacy Abrams, as well as he sister's ruling on pruning ineligible voters from the rolls.
The GOP legislatures need to tighten-up voting laws or the dems will swamp every election with bogus mail-in votes.
Barr appointed Durham well before the election to help Trump get re-elected. Many at the time had such respect for Durham that they were shocked that Durham would become involved in such an endeavor.
Well Durham actually did do an investigation. A real one. And found nothing. That left Barr with nothing.
Stacey Abrams? Huh? She did a strong get out the vote program. There was noting nefarious about that
And her sister? Are you saying that judges can't rule on cases in which anyone they are at all close to have any involvement?
So that means that Justice Thomas must recuse from any case regarding abortion since his wife is so heavily involved in the anti-abortion movement. Do you think that's gonna happen?
We have had mail in voting for decades. In fact in states like Florida, Republicans predominantly vote that wayFrance doesn't allow mail-in voting due to voter fraud. The US needs to follow France's lead.Nope.All Barr had to do was issue a report of what was investigated and what the findings were.Trump's hand picked AG said there was no sizable voter fraud.
That said, the GOP got outplayed in GA. The Consent Decree was a coup for Stacy Abrams, as well as he sister's ruling on pruning ineligible voters from the rolls.
The GOP legislatures need to tighten-up voting laws or the dems will swamp every election with bogus mail-in votes.
Vote by mail needs to be expanded. Five states have done it for a while and there has never been anyone who claimed the elections were illegitimate and there hasn't been any greater fraud in those elections than the other 45 states. So no..
France split over ‘American’ mail-in ballots for 2021 regional elections
The French government is no closer to allowing voting by mail even as it works to adapt next year’s regional elections into a safe event compatible with sanitary precautions.www.politico.eu
Perhaps rules need to be instituted. The military is a given. Senior citizens as an option. Those disabled with proof of not being ambulatory as another.We have had mail in voting for decades. In fact in states like Florida, Republicans predominantly vote that wayFrance doesn't allow mail-in voting due to voter fraud. The US needs to follow France's lead.Nope.All Barr had to do was issue a report of what was investigated and what the findings were.Trump's hand picked AG said there was no sizable voter fraud.
That said, the GOP got outplayed in GA. The Consent Decree was a coup for Stacy Abrams, as well as he sister's ruling on pruning ineligible voters from the rolls.
The GOP legislatures need to tighten-up voting laws or the dems will swamp every election with bogus mail-in votes.
Vote by mail needs to be expanded. Five states have done it for a while and there has never been anyone who claimed the elections were illegitimate and there hasn't been any greater fraud in those elections than the other 45 states. So no..
France split over ‘American’ mail-in ballots for 2021 regional elections
The French government is no closer to allowing voting by mail even as it works to adapt next year’s regional elections into a safe event compatible with sanitary precautions.
THAT'S ESSENTIALLY THE ONLY WAY THAT THE MILITARY CAN vote.
And you want to end that?
You aren't being honest or serious
I'm okay with "absentee voting" when a real voter requests a ballot and provides a real reason that they can't vote in-person, along with signature matching.We have had mail in voting for decades. In fact in states like Florida, Republicans predominantly vote that wayFrance doesn't allow mail-in voting due to voter fraud. The US needs to follow France's lead.Nope.All Barr had to do was issue a report of what was investigated and what the findings were.Trump's hand picked AG said there was no sizable voter fraud.
That said, the GOP got outplayed in GA. The Consent Decree was a coup for Stacy Abrams, as well as he sister's ruling on pruning ineligible voters from the rolls.
The GOP legislatures need to tighten-up voting laws or the dems will swamp every election with bogus mail-in votes.
Vote by mail needs to be expanded. Five states have done it for a while and there has never been anyone who claimed the elections were illegitimate and there hasn't been any greater fraud in those elections than the other 45 states. So no..
France split over ‘American’ mail-in ballots for 2021 regional elections
The French government is no closer to allowing voting by mail even as it works to adapt next year’s regional elections into a safe event compatible with sanitary precautions.
THAT'S ESSENTIALLY THE ONLY WAY THAT THE MILITARY CAN vote.
And you want to end that?
You aren't being honest or serious
In spite of efforts my the mainsleaze media to suppress it, there is content all over the smaller, but less censored media, showing what appear to be many diverse instances of what undeniably constitute serious irregularities in the election process. It would be a rather extreme stretch to deny that if these irregularities are as presented, that they constitute anything but outright cheating.The courts should NOT have dismissed the voter fraud cases. They should have allowed them to approach the courts and with transparency show the American people it was either a concern or invalid.
They should have done this knowing if they did not, the nation would remain divided forever.
But perhaps this is what they really wanted all along.
And God forbid any of it might have gone Trumps way. That would have been unacceptable.
If Durham had found anything why would Barr not have released it? Surely you're not claiming Barr was some Dem plant.1. How do you know Durham found nothing? Why do you think Barr gave him Special Prosecutor status if there was no progress?
Apparently anyone who thinks differently than the DNC does live in a fantasy world.Rand lived in a fantasy world of her own making. Do you?It was strange, she thought, to obtain news by means of nothing but denials, as if existence had ceased, facts had vanished and only the frantic negatives uttered by officials and columnists gave any clue to the reality they were denying.Probably not. Trump is not smart enough to be a Russian asset. Putin wouldn't trust him not to shoot off his mouth if he needed an attention fix.I reckon it all comes down to what media sources you want to believe.Oh silly one, the courts did take it on...The courts should NOT have dismissed the voter fraud cases. They should have allowed them to approach the courts and with transparency show the American people it was either a concern or invalid.
They should have done this knowing if they did not, the nation would remain divided forever.
But perhaps this is what they really wanted all along.
And God forbid any of it might have gone Trumps way. That would have been unacceptable.
You just are listening to fake news...
And your FAKE media, counted on you believing what they were saying, and not actually read all the court cases and what and why the judges ruled t h e way they did...
The State and federal courts didn't just say out of the clear blue, a case didn't have standing, or dismissed or denied....everything submitted was reviewed, state constitutions and election laws were reviewed, evidence presented was reviewed, all before the judges came to their rulings and they explained thoroughly why they ruled the way they did....
Do you believe the ones that spouted Trump was a Putin puppet for the last 4 years with a full investigation that resulted in nothing, or do you believe the ones that said there was voter fraud, for which no one will investigate?
But then, now that news sources are being censored, now everyone only has your news sources, so now maybe everyone will start to believe the same thing.
In fact, I bet you still believe Trump is a Putin spy, don't you.
Atlas Shrugged, Ayn Rand, 1957
People from the past saw this coming.
Just read 1984 and you would think it was today.
There is that argument. I don't agree for a number of reasons that I won't get into right now. BUT...most of the states you folks are complaining about did not have that systemI'm okay with "absentee voting" when a real voter requests a ballot and provides a real reason that they can't vote in-person, along with signature matching.We have had mail in voting for decades. In fact in states like Florida, Republicans predominantly vote that wayFrance doesn't allow mail-in voting due to voter fraud. The US needs to follow France's lead.Nope.All Barr had to do was issue a report of what was investigated and what the findings were.Trump's hand picked AG said there was no sizable voter fraud.
That said, the GOP got outplayed in GA. The Consent Decree was a coup for Stacy Abrams, as well as he sister's ruling on pruning ineligible voters from the rolls.
The GOP legislatures need to tighten-up voting laws or the dems will swamp every election with bogus mail-in votes.
Vote by mail needs to be expanded. Five states have done it for a while and there has never been anyone who claimed the elections were illegitimate and there hasn't been any greater fraud in those elections than the other 45 states. So no..
France split over ‘American’ mail-in ballots for 2021 regional elections
The French government is no closer to allowing voting by mail even as it works to adapt next year’s regional elections into a safe event compatible with sanitary precautions.
THAT'S ESSENTIALLY THE ONLY WAY THAT THE MILITARY CAN vote.
And you want to end that?
You aren't being honest or serious
Not "much like" that at all. In fact nothing like thatMuch like the former USSR would send their political opponents away to a mental facility.
You may be right. Until Durham issues a report, indictments, or folds his tent I have no idea what he's doing.If Durham had found anything why would Barr not have released it? Surely you're not claiming Barr was some Dem plant.1. How do you know Durham found nothing? Why do you think Barr gave him Special Prosecutor status if there was no progress?
Barr gave him Special Prosecutor status so that he could expand his investigation in order to search other areas to find "something". He found nothing even then.
And note...Durham's "second in command" resigned in the fall because of pressure to gin "something" up.
Rand wrote about a 2 dimensional world of makers and takers. The real world is a complicated tapistry with every color present. Everyone is a maker AND a taker at different stages of their lives.Apparently anyone who thinks differently than the DNC does live in a fantasy world.Rand lived in a fantasy world of her own making. Do you?
Much like the former USSR would send their political opponents away to a mental facility.
Naturally, your type of hate speech only tries to foment violence.
They looked at your "evidence" of voter fraud and 60 times they laughed it out of court.The courts should NOT have dismissed the voter fraud cases. They should have allowed them to approach the courts and with transparency show the American people it was either a concern or invalid.
They should have done this knowing if they did not, the nation would remain divided forever.
But perhaps this is what they really wanted all along.
And God forbid any of it might have gone Trumps way. That would have been unacceptable.
The constitution of the United states dictates it is up to the states to run their own elections with their own rules, NOT the federal govt, or another State making the rules for them.Perhaps rules need to be instituted. The military is a given. Senior citizens as an option. Those disabled with proof of not being ambulatory as another.We have had mail in voting for decades. In fact in states like Florida, Republicans predominantly vote that wayFrance doesn't allow mail-in voting due to voter fraud. The US needs to follow France's lead.Nope.All Barr had to do was issue a report of what was investigated and what the findings were.Trump's hand picked AG said there was no sizable voter fraud.
That said, the GOP got outplayed in GA. The Consent Decree was a coup for Stacy Abrams, as well as he sister's ruling on pruning ineligible voters from the rolls.
The GOP legislatures need to tighten-up voting laws or the dems will swamp every election with bogus mail-in votes.
Vote by mail needs to be expanded. Five states have done it for a while and there has never been anyone who claimed the elections were illegitimate and there hasn't been any greater fraud in those elections than the other 45 states. So no..
France split over ‘American’ mail-in ballots for 2021 regional elections
The French government is no closer to allowing voting by mail even as it works to adapt next year’s regional elections into a safe event compatible with sanitary precautions.
THAT'S ESSENTIALLY THE ONLY WAY THAT THE MILITARY CAN vote.
And you want to end that?
You aren't being honest or serious
ummmm, what of 0 4 60 escaped your attention? Seriously. JFCThe courts should NOT have dismissed the voter fraud cases. They should have allowed them to approach the courts and with transparency show the American people it was either a concern or invalid.
They should have done this knowing if they did not, the nation would remain divided forever.
But perhaps this is what they really wanted all along.
And God forbid any of it might have gone Trumps way. That would have been unacceptable.
PACER is the official U.S. site, they charge for downloading/printing copies of the documents but it's not a lot, I think maybe 10 cents a page.Ok, where can average people review these summaries?That's how the judge knows when to dismiss cases.... each side presents a summary of what they got....then the judge decides if the case moves forward or dismissed for various reasons.If a judge dismisses a case he still hears the evidence? Since when?No one refused any evidence of voter fraud in the courts, there just was NO EVIDENCE presented to the courts on voter fraud.How do you know what the evidence is if you refuse to hear it?Agreed.The courts should NOT have dismissed the voter fraud cases. They should have allowed them to approach the courts and with transparency show the American people it was either a concern or invalid.
They should have done this knowing if they did not, the nation would remain divided forever.
But perhaps this is what they really wanted all along.
And God forbid any of it might have gone Trumps way. That would have been unacceptable.
The courts should have ignored the fact that there was no objective, documented evidence in support of ‘fraud’ and simply taken Trump’s lawyers’ word for it – scout’s honor.
The judge can not make the decision to dismiss without review of the case and evidence presented.
They just don't simply say "dismissed", the judges give a summary of WHY the cases and evidence was rejected.
Haha... Which voter fraud issue should they have taken? What’s the best case you got?The courts should NOT have dismissed the voter fraud cases. They should have allowed them to approach the courts and with transparency show the American people it was either a concern or invalid.
They should have done this knowing if they did not, the nation would remain divided forever.
But perhaps this is what they really wanted all along.
And God forbid any of it might have gone Trumps way. That would have been unacceptable.
As long as you also provide free public transportation along with your new rules. You do want every eligible voter to vote, don't you?Perhaps rules need to be instituted. The military is a given. Senior citizens as an option. Those disabled with proof of not being ambulatory as another.We have had mail in voting for decades. In fact in states like Florida, Republicans predominantly vote that wayFrance doesn't allow mail-in voting due to voter fraud. The US needs to follow France's lead.Nope.All Barr had to do was issue a report of what was investigated and what the findings were.Trump's hand picked AG said there was no sizable voter fraud.
That said, the GOP got outplayed in GA. The Consent Decree was a coup for Stacy Abrams, as well as he sister's ruling on pruning ineligible voters from the rolls.
The GOP legislatures need to tighten-up voting laws or the dems will swamp every election with bogus mail-in votes.
Vote by mail needs to be expanded. Five states have done it for a while and there has never been anyone who claimed the elections were illegitimate and there hasn't been any greater fraud in those elections than the other 45 states. So no..
France split over ‘American’ mail-in ballots for 2021 regional elections
The French government is no closer to allowing voting by mail even as it works to adapt next year’s regional elections into a safe event compatible with sanitary precautions.
THAT'S ESSENTIALLY THE ONLY WAY THAT THE MILITARY CAN vote.
And you want to end that?
You aren't being honest or serious
You don't have to have a reason. I don't want to stand in line for hours and be exposed to the covid epidemic. Let each state decide how to run their elections.. That's lawful.I'm okay with "absentee voting" when a real voter requests a ballot and provides a real reason that they can't vote in-person, along with signature matching.We have had mail in voting for decades. In fact in states like Florida, Republicans predominantly vote that wayFrance doesn't allow mail-in voting due to voter fraud. The US needs to follow France's lead.Nope.All Barr had to do was issue a report of what was investigated and what the findings were.Trump's hand picked AG said there was no sizable voter fraud.
That said, the GOP got outplayed in GA. The Consent Decree was a coup for Stacy Abrams, as well as he sister's ruling on pruning ineligible voters from the rolls.
The GOP legislatures need to tighten-up voting laws or the dems will swamp every election with bogus mail-in votes.
Vote by mail needs to be expanded. Five states have done it for a while and there has never been anyone who claimed the elections were illegitimate and there hasn't been any greater fraud in those elections than the other 45 states. So no..
France split over ‘American’ mail-in ballots for 2021 regional elections
The French government is no closer to allowing voting by mail even as it works to adapt next year’s regional elections into a safe event compatible with sanitary precautions.
THAT'S ESSENTIALLY THE ONLY WAY THAT THE MILITARY CAN vote.
And you want to end that?
You aren't being honest or serious
