JimBowie1958
Old Fogey
- Sep 25, 2011
- 63,590
- 16,756
- 2,220
There are no reasons; it's Matthew!On what grounds can you impeach Trump when he's not been found guilty of a damn thing?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
There are no reasons; it's Matthew!On what grounds can you impeach Trump when he's not been found guilty of a damn thing?
The congress should impeach Donald Trump for screwing over thousands of people out of their life savings with Trump university and for being a sexual predator.
Do you agree?
You ignorant fuck! You were wrong! You've been shown you were wrong! An impeachment and the subsequent trial are a criminal process and NOT a "civil process" as you erroneously claimed, Tex! Live with it! You've been proven wrong, but you are unwilling to cope with the fact that you are all hat and no cattle, Tex.NO, fool, as you should know! The Senate is not an Article III Court, and has circumscribed powers for a trial of impeachment and the punishment imposed. You know the extent of the punishment for a president being found guilty of "HIGH CRIMES and MISDEMEANORS", which are, by their very definition, CRIMES, is removal from office. That is the power granted to the Senate; to adjudicate whether or not the president committed a crime.One question, yes or no answer is all that required. Can the senate impose criminal sanctions such as fines or imprisonment?
That makes the impeachment and trial a CRIMINAL PROCESS, you thick headed idiot! It sure as fuck is not a "civil process" as you claimed and for which I took you to task. If you disagree with that, take it up with the legal eagles who say you're wrong, too, which have already been cited!
Tex, you're being stupid. Get on your Shetland pony and ride into the fucking sunset you bloody imbecile!
Couldn't just give a simple answer to a simple question, you just had to go off on another irrational rant.
Now for simple yes/no question number 2.
Is the standard for a conviction for removal, "beyond a reasonable doubt", like a criminal trial, or is it a simple "preponderance of the evidence", like a civil trial? No need to rant, just a short answer, because I'll just ignore the rant anyways.
They impeached Bill Clinton for a blow job.There are no reasons; it's Matthew!On what grounds can you impeach Trump when he's not been found guilty of a damn thing?
You ignorant fuck! You were wrong! You've been shown you were wrong! An impeachment and the subsequent trial are a criminal process and NOT a "civil process" as you erroneously claimed, Tex! Live with it! You've been proven wrong, but you are unwilling to cope with the fact that you are all hat and no cattle, Tex.NO, fool, as you should know! The Senate is not an Article III Court, and has circumscribed powers for a trial of impeachment and the punishment imposed. You know the extent of the punishment for a president being found guilty of "HIGH CRIMES and MISDEMEANORS", which are, by their very definition, CRIMES, is removal from office. That is the power granted to the Senate; to adjudicate whether or not the president committed a crime.One question, yes or no answer is all that required. Can the senate impose criminal sanctions such as fines or imprisonment?
That makes the impeachment and trial a CRIMINAL PROCESS, you thick headed idiot! It sure as fuck is not a "civil process" as you claimed and for which I took you to task. If you disagree with that, take it up with the legal eagles who say you're wrong, too, which have already been cited!
Tex, you're being stupid. Get on your Shetland pony and ride into the fucking sunset you bloody imbecile!
Couldn't just give a simple answer to a simple question, you just had to go off on another irrational rant.
Now for simple yes/no question number 2.
Is the standard for a conviction for removal, "beyond a reasonable doubt", like a criminal trial, or is it a simple "preponderance of the evidence", like a civil trial? No need to rant, just a short answer, because I'll just ignore the rant anyways.
Fuck your 20 questions bullshit! I'm on to that ploy, slick!
They impeached Bill Clinton for a blow job.There are no reasons; it's Matthew!On what grounds can you impeach Trump when he's not been found guilty of a damn thing?
Impeachment is an accusation, it's not being guilty of anything.
Besides that:
"The President, Vice President, and all civil officers of the United States" who may be impeached and removed only for "treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors"
Impeachment - Wikipedia
plus he has a long history of bribery and some of the things he is about to do can be considered as treason, if some are not already.
Finally you got the message that I'm on to your games of trying to change the narrative to avoid the topics of your errors.You ignorant fuck! You were wrong! You've been shown you were wrong! An impeachment and the subsequent trial are a criminal process and NOT a "civil process" as you erroneously claimed, Tex! Live with it! You've been proven wrong, but you are unwilling to cope with the fact that you are all hat and no cattle, Tex.NO, fool, as you should know! The Senate is not an Article III Court, and has circumscribed powers for a trial of impeachment and the punishment imposed. You know the extent of the punishment for a president being found guilty of "HIGH CRIMES and MISDEMEANORS", which are, by their very definition, CRIMES, is removal from office. That is the power granted to the Senate; to adjudicate whether or not the president committed a crime.One question, yes or no answer is all that required. Can the senate impose criminal sanctions such as fines or imprisonment?
That makes the impeachment and trial a CRIMINAL PROCESS, you thick headed idiot! It sure as fuck is not a "civil process" as you claimed and for which I took you to task. If you disagree with that, take it up with the legal eagles who say you're wrong, too, which have already been cited!
Tex, you're being stupid. Get on your Shetland pony and ride into the fucking sunset you bloody imbecile!
Couldn't just give a simple answer to a simple question, you just had to go off on another irrational rant.
Now for simple yes/no question number 2.
Is the standard for a conviction for removal, "beyond a reasonable doubt", like a criminal trial, or is it a simple "preponderance of the evidence", like a civil trial? No need to rant, just a short answer, because I'll just ignore the rant anyways.
Fuck your 20 questions bullshit! I'm on to that ploy, slick!
I'm sorry you can't seem to understand longer paragraphs so I was trying to walk you through it step by step. Evidently you lack the intellect to even do that. Now run along an play with your little friends and maybe your momma will fix you PB&J and a big glass of milk for lunch.
Settle down, Matt. In eight short years you'll have some other Republican president-elect to get your shorts in a knot over.The congress should impeach Donald Trump for screwing over thousands of people out of their life savings with Trump university and for being a sexual predator.
Do you agree?
The congress should impeach Donald Trump for screwing over thousands of people out of their life savings with Trump university and for being a sexual predator.
Do you agree?
Finally you got the message that I'm on to your games of trying to change the narrative to avoid the topics of your errors.You ignorant fuck! You were wrong! You've been shown you were wrong! An impeachment and the subsequent trial are a criminal process and NOT a "civil process" as you erroneously claimed, Tex! Live with it! You've been proven wrong, but you are unwilling to cope with the fact that you are all hat and no cattle, Tex.NO, fool, as you should know! The Senate is not an Article III Court, and has circumscribed powers for a trial of impeachment and the punishment imposed. You know the extent of the punishment for a president being found guilty of "HIGH CRIMES and MISDEMEANORS", which are, by their very definition, CRIMES, is removal from office. That is the power granted to the Senate; to adjudicate whether or not the president committed a crime.One question, yes or no answer is all that required. Can the senate impose criminal sanctions such as fines or imprisonment?
That makes the impeachment and trial a CRIMINAL PROCESS, you thick headed idiot! It sure as fuck is not a "civil process" as you claimed and for which I took you to task. If you disagree with that, take it up with the legal eagles who say you're wrong, too, which have already been cited!
Tex, you're being stupid. Get on your Shetland pony and ride into the fucking sunset you bloody imbecile!
Couldn't just give a simple answer to a simple question, you just had to go off on another irrational rant.
Now for simple yes/no question number 2.
Is the standard for a conviction for removal, "beyond a reasonable doubt", like a criminal trial, or is it a simple "preponderance of the evidence", like a civil trial? No need to rant, just a short answer, because I'll just ignore the rant anyways.
Fuck your 20 questions bullshit! I'm on to that ploy, slick!
I'm sorry you can't seem to understand longer paragraphs so I was trying to walk you through it step by step. Evidently you lack the intellect to even do that. Now run along an play with your little friends and maybe your momma will fix you PB&J and a big glass of milk for lunch.
I doubt that you ever understood that "high crimes and misdemeanors" implicitly implies unlawful and/or improper conduct with consequences and that the Senate's responsibilities for impeachment trials are implicitly a check on the Executive for any malfeasance and/or misfeasance in office. That check written into the Constitution is certainly NOT a "civil process" as you have clung to in your misbelief of things Constitutional!
You opened your post to which I'm now responding with, "I'm sorry..." Finally, that is something upon which we can find common ground and agree! You are sorry, Tex! Ya'all have a nice day now, Tex, and try to keep your powder out of the water next time, drugstore cowboy!
it took them a while to get Capone.....just sayin....On what grounds can you impeach Trump when he's not been found guilty of a damn thing?
On what grounds do you have to arrest Hillary clinton when she's not been found guilty of a damn thing?
First you indict. Then you arrest. Then you have a trial. THEN, and only then, do they get to spend time at the gray bar Hilton.
LOL after 30+ years of investigations when the fuck are they going to indict her. How many millions more are they going to spend on useless investigations?
Your blather is full of shit, Tex, and your playground taunts are simply petty drivel from a small mind!Finally you got the message that I'm on to your games of trying to change the narrative to avoid the topics of your errors.You ignorant fuck! You were wrong! You've been shown you were wrong! An impeachment and the subsequent trial are a criminal process and NOT a "civil process" as you erroneously claimed, Tex! Live with it! You've been proven wrong, but you are unwilling to cope with the fact that you are all hat and no cattle, Tex.NO, fool, as you should know! The Senate is not an Article III Court, and has circumscribed powers for a trial of impeachment and the punishment imposed. You know the extent of the punishment for a president being found guilty of "HIGH CRIMES and MISDEMEANORS", which are, by their very definition, CRIMES, is removal from office. That is the power granted to the Senate; to adjudicate whether or not the president committed a crime.
That makes the impeachment and trial a CRIMINAL PROCESS, you thick headed idiot! It sure as fuck is not a "civil process" as you claimed and for which I took you to task. If you disagree with that, take it up with the legal eagles who say you're wrong, too, which have already been cited!
Tex, you're being stupid. Get on your Shetland pony and ride into the fucking sunset you bloody imbecile!
Couldn't just give a simple answer to a simple question, you just had to go off on another irrational rant.
Now for simple yes/no question number 2.
Is the standard for a conviction for removal, "beyond a reasonable doubt", like a criminal trial, or is it a simple "preponderance of the evidence", like a civil trial? No need to rant, just a short answer, because I'll just ignore the rant anyways.
Fuck your 20 questions bullshit! I'm on to that ploy, slick!
I'm sorry you can't seem to understand longer paragraphs so I was trying to walk you through it step by step. Evidently you lack the intellect to even do that. Now run along an play with your little friends and maybe your momma will fix you PB&J and a big glass of milk for lunch.
I doubt that you ever understood that "high crimes and misdemeanors" implicitly implies unlawful and/or improper conduct with consequences and that the Senate's responsibilities for impeachment trials are implicitly a check on the Executive for any malfeasance and/or misfeasance in office. That check written into the Constitution is certainly NOT a "civil process" as you have clung to in your misbelief of things Constitutional!
You opened your post to which I'm now responding with, "I'm sorry..." Finally, that is something upon which we can find common ground and agree! You are sorry, Tex! Ya'all have a nice day now, Tex, and try to keep your powder out of the water next time, drugstore cowboy!
I guess you didn't get the PB&J for lunch, did you piss your mommy off?
Impeachment is a constitutional civil administrative process conducted by the peoples elected representatives. SCOTUS is only involved when the impeachment is of the president. Even then the CJ is only there to maintain order and has no involvement in the decision. Now run along and play with your little friends, you're dismissed.
Your blather is full of shit, Tex, and your playground taunts are simply petty drivel from a small mind!Finally you got the message that I'm on to your games of trying to change the narrative to avoid the topics of your errors.You ignorant fuck! You were wrong! You've been shown you were wrong! An impeachment and the subsequent trial are a criminal process and NOT a "civil process" as you erroneously claimed, Tex! Live with it! You've been proven wrong, but you are unwilling to cope with the fact that you are all hat and no cattle, Tex.Couldn't just give a simple answer to a simple question, you just had to go off on another irrational rant.
Now for simple yes/no question number 2.
Is the standard for a conviction for removal, "beyond a reasonable doubt", like a criminal trial, or is it a simple "preponderance of the evidence", like a civil trial? No need to rant, just a short answer, because I'll just ignore the rant anyways.
Fuck your 20 questions bullshit! I'm on to that ploy, slick!
I'm sorry you can't seem to understand longer paragraphs so I was trying to walk you through it step by step. Evidently you lack the intellect to even do that. Now run along an play with your little friends and maybe your momma will fix you PB&J and a big glass of milk for lunch.
I doubt that you ever understood that "high crimes and misdemeanors" implicitly implies unlawful and/or improper conduct with consequences and that the Senate's responsibilities for impeachment trials are implicitly a check on the Executive for any malfeasance and/or misfeasance in office. That check written into the Constitution is certainly NOT a "civil process" as you have clung to in your misbelief of things Constitutional!
You opened your post to which I'm now responding with, "I'm sorry..." Finally, that is something upon which we can find common ground and agree! You are sorry, Tex! Ya'all have a nice day now, Tex, and try to keep your powder out of the water next time, drugstore cowboy!
I guess you didn't get the PB&J for lunch, did you piss your mommy off?
Impeachment is a constitutional civil administrative process conducted by the peoples elected representatives. SCOTUS is only involved when the impeachment is of the president. Even then the CJ is only there to maintain order and has no involvement in the decision. Now run along and play with your little friends, you're dismissed.
Impeachment trials for malfeasance and misfeasance emanating from the WH are criminal in their aspect. You can claim all fucking day that they are a "civil process" and ignore the citations I have provided displaying your stubborn, stupid wrongheadedness, but that will never change the fact that you are wrong!
You have become a waste of oxygen, Tex, and a fruitcake not worth a candle!