Dr Grump
Platinum Member
Ok..so I listened...I didn’t hear them reference any actual science at all. I heard them express opinion after opinion without a bit of actual science to support them.
Again...is this sort of thing what constitutes science and evidence in your mind? I posted a wheelbarrow full of peer reviewed, published science in rebuttal of your last audiovisual alarmist lollapalooza and you completely dodged it....not a word in rebuttal.....not a single piece of actual science aclling any of it into question...and then you post this as more evidence...
Forty plus minutes of self serving alarmism without the first reference to any science at all to support it...does that sort of thing actually impress you enough to convince you to be alarmed?
Feel free to point out any time marker within the whole thing that you think constitutes actual evidence and I will be happy to go back and listen again.
And since you dodged all the published, peer reviewed science I already provided, should I assume that you didn’t even bother to look at it or that you just have nothing to say about it?
It was taken as a given that the science is in. As she said, the fact insurance companies and your own military are taking it seriously says something. As for the science, I am not going to yet again post stuff that I have posted on this site at least three other times over the past 13 years. I'm sick of it. Not as sick as I am as you guys passing off your links as 'science'. When the vast majority of climate scientists say it is happening - and they have published screeds of peer-reviewed data - then I'll go with them.