The Climate Change Cult

Dr Grump

Gold Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2006
Messages
27,252
Reaction score
4,331
Points
280
Location
From the Back of Beyond
Got any actual empirical evidence to support your claim that humanity is changing the global climate or are you, like all the rest of the alarmists simply assuming that the natural variation we have experienced in the climate over the past 150 years is due to humanity?

Corelation does not equal causation...if you have some actual evidence...that is some observed, measured evidence, by all means, lets see it.
Ah the old 'empirical evidence' false flag. Don't need empirical evidence. Modelling will do just fine thanks.
Nobody - not even climate scientists - are saying there are no natural variations. Actually, they are at pains to say there are. However, the speed and causation of the current climate change(s) are man made. Fact Jack.

You cannot use 'measured' evidence because you would need thousands of years to prove it to that degree. Thus, the well proven and normal method of modelling is used.
 

mamooth

Gold Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2012
Messages
21,971
Reaction score
4,128
Points
290
Location
Indianapolis, Indiana
CO2 failed to prevent the unusually early widespread cold and snow events,
As no one ever said global warming would mean the end of cold, you now look hilariously stupid and dishonest for making that claim.

So why did you make such a stupid claim? Was it due to stupidity or due to deliberate dishonesty? If you'd like to say it was both, I'm sure everyone will believe you.

And who convinced you that you were capable of debating the grownups? I bet it was the other religious nutters in skook's circle-jerk thread, wasn't it? I almost feel sorry for you. There you were, having a smoke after the hategasm, thinking you'd show those libtards who's boss, and then you came over here and reality gave you one monster bitch slap.
 

ChemEngineer

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2019
Messages
1,370
Reaction score
519
Points
200
Maxine Waters, Hank Johnson, and Mamooth. Who wouldn't want to join this esteemed group of scholars.

The lion does not turn around when a small dog barks. - Nigerian Proverb

My Ignore List just grew by you. What a vulgar ignoramus you are.

ciao
 

mamooth

Gold Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2012
Messages
21,971
Reaction score
4,128
Points
290
Location
Indianapolis, Indiana
Maxine Waters, Hank Johnson, and Mamooth. Who wouldn't want to join this esteemed group of scholars.
Especially funny is how you always start out by being an insulting ass, which is always followed by you squealing like the sissyboy that you are when you get a little back. Bitch, if you can't take the heat, stay out of the kitchen.

Now, back to the topic. Why did you tell the big lie that someone was predicting an end to cold? Did you lie out of stupidity, or was the dishonesty deliberate?

By the way, should we consider the previous post to be your "declare victory and run" speech, or will that come a little later?
 

tycho1572

Gold Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2016
Messages
12,701
Reaction score
2,629
Points
290
It’s hard to think these people are sane and rational....

 

Fort Fun Indiana

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2017
Messages
41,633
Reaction score
4,040
Points
1,855
So... have any of you denier freaks published your peer reviewed research yet?

No?

Okay. I will check back in about a zillion years.
 

SSDD

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2012
Messages
16,806
Reaction score
1,893
Points
280
So... have any of you denier freaks published your peer reviewed research yet?

No?

Okay. I will check back in about a zillion years.
Speaking of publishing..your consensus, to date, has failed to publish a single paper in which the warming that we are supposed to be causing has been empirically measured, quantified, and blamed on greenhouse gasses.

Nor have they published a single paper in which empirical evidence is introduced which establishes a coherent relationship between the absorption of IR by a gas and warming in the atmosphere...

Nor have they published a single bit of observed, measured data which supports the AGW hypothesis over natural variability...

That being the case...exactly what do you suppose the "consensus" is based on since it clearly isn't the scientific evidence?
 

luchitociencia

VIP Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2019
Messages
1,327
Reaction score
248
Points
80


Forget about "climate change".

They really fight against "global warming".

That is their lunacy, and they just try to camouflage their real motto.
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top