Zone1 The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints the only true and living Church today

The one true Church of God is a SABBATH KEEPING and Holy Day keeping church

Yours isn't it. Yours has accepted the paganism that has creepy into the Great Whore in the Bible.
We are a Sabbath keeping Church. I have no idea why you would say this? The Sabbath is a Holy Day, not a holiday. You cannot find one thing that would suggest otherwise. You sir are either the most ignorant person or a liar. Nor have we allowed paganism into the Doctrines of the Church. Again, you are either the most ignorant person or a liar.
 
Amos tell of a time of the downfall of Israel when they would go from sea to sea seeking the word of the Lord and not be able to find it.

Amos 8:11-12
11 Behold, the days come, saith the Lord God, that I will send a famine in the land, not a famine of bread, nor a thirst for water, but of hearing the words of the Lord:

12 And they shall wander from sea to sea, and from the north even to the east, they shall run to and fro to seek the word of the Lord, and shall not find it.

Amos is giving a prophesy from the Lord God. He is telling of a famine of hearing the word of the Lord and that they shall wander from sea to sea and from north to east and run to and fro to seek after the word of the Lord yet they will not be able to find it. Amos lived around 700 BC. This famine was to come after he prophesied about it. If the Lord through Amos made this prophesy, surely it had to either have come to pass sometime after the prophesy was made or is yet to come to pass. This prophesy speaks of a time when no apostles or prophets are revealing the word of the Lord. It speaks of an apostasy from having the word of the Lord.

 
this is a stupid sentence by the writers of your quote, "According to 7:14, Amos was neither a prophet nor the son of a prophet; i.e., he was not a member of a professional prophetic guild. His only credential to prophesy to Israel was a summons by Yahweh."

Amos was relating what he was before being called by the Lord Jehovah, ie Jesus Christ, as a prophet in Amos 7:14. It states in verse 15 the following:

Amos 7:15
15 And the Lord took me as I followed the flock, and the Lord said unto me, Go, prophesy unto my people Israel.

I would believe that all prophets before they are called by God to be a prophet are not considered prophets. But once called they are prophets of God just as Amos was called.
 
Amos's His only credential to prophesy to Israel was a summons by Yahweh."
And He was correct. The Sons of Yacob were condemned for their rebellion, even as America is under the curse of Isaiah 5 today.
The LDS folks are nice people, but when their Prophet sold out and called for everyone to get injected with covid depopulation drugs, it was a bad sign.
The Book of Mormon starts out before the Syrian King, Nebuchadnezar came to enforce the Covenant between Yacob & Laban, the Syrian Genesis 31, and has many good qualities to it. However, it uses a false name for the Messiah and another false name for the enemies of the Messiah,and based on that, the LDS leadership contributed Granite Stones to rebuild Herod's temple for the anti-Christs pretending to be Biblical Israel. On top of that, the Book of Mormon contains Eve's testimony about Adam's Garden of Eden sin in which she says the sin was necessary. It may have been inevitable, but, was not necessary. The Apostle Paul said she was deceived. 1 Timothy 2:14. As for Adam, when confronted by Yahuah, Adam said nothing about a snake, but, instead Adam bore false witness against the Creator and the beautiful woman the Creator made for Adam. Thus, Adam was the sly snake who chose to define good and evil for himself and mentally murder Yahuah, which deed entered the genetic code of Cain and all subsequent sons of Adam even to now. Overcoming that is what any Son of Adam has to do to enter the New Yerusalelm and Bless the families of Earth and fill Christ's Universe with People free of Adam's curse.
 
Last edited:
Amos's His only credential to prophesy to Israel was a summons by Yahweh."
His only credential? Being chosen by God himself is the only credential any prophet would need!
And He was correct. The Sons of Yacob were condemned for their rebellion, even as America is under the curse of Isaiah 5 today.
The LDS folks are nice people, but when their Prophet sold out and called for everyone to get injected with covid depopulation drugs, it was a bad sign.
We don't claim the false doctrine of infallibility of the Prophet. Prophets in the bible have made mistakes as well.
The Book of Mormon starts out before the Syrian King, Nebuchadnezar came to enforce the Covenant between Yacob & Laban, the Syrian Genesis 31, and has many good qualities to it. However, it uses a false name for the Messiah and another false name for the enemies of the Messiah
The Book of Mormon begins around 597-596 BC. Jacob and Laban of Genesis 31 was way before that timeframe. The Laban mentioned in Genesis 31 is not the same one that is mentioned in the book of Mormon. The Jacob of Genesis 31 is the grandson of Abraham and the Father of the House of Israel. Jacob's name was changed to Israel and from him came the 12 tribes of Israel. It was in the first year of the reign of Zedekiah King of Judah (see 1 Nephi 1). Genesis 31 occurred approximately 1908 BC. They don't relate at all. And what are the false names you are referring to?
,and based on that, the LDS leadership contributed Granite Stones to rebuild Herod's temple for the anti-Christs pretending to be Biblical Israel.
Herod's temple? The LDS leadership didn't even exist during the days of Herod!
On top of that, the Book of Mormon contains Eve's testimony about Adam's Garden of Eden sin in which she says the sin was necessary. It may have been inevitable, but, was not necessary. The Apostle Paul said she was deceived. 1 Timothy 2:14.
Eve was deceive by Satan as Genesis 3 tells us. However, that does not mean that the fall was not necessary. If God did not want Adam and Eve to fall, He, knowing the end from the beginning, could have simply kept Satan from going to the earth and kept Adam and Eve away from the tree of knowledge of good and evil. God knew that Satan would tempt Eve and he also knew that Adam and Eve would choose to partake of the forbidden fruit. He knew this before the foundation of the earth and called Jesus to be the Savior before the foundation of the world knowing full well that the fall of mankind would occur and provided a Savior way in advance. If God didn't want it and if it wasn't necessary, He simply could have avoided the whole thing.

Why else would God send the rest of us to be born into a fallen world? We didn't transgress his laws. Yet God sends us down to a mortal earth as the children of Adam and Eve to experience a fallen world and learn by experience the difference between good and evil. This made Adam and Eve to progress to become more like God.

Genesis 3:22
22 ¶ And the Lord God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:

Here we read that Adam and Eve progressed to become more like God by knowing good and evil.
As for Adam, when confronted by Yahuah, Adam said nothing about a snake, but, instead Adam bore false witness against the Creator and the beautiful woman the Creator made for Adam. Thus, Adam was the sly snake who chose to define good and evil for himself and mentally murder Yahuah, which deed entered the genetic code of Cain and all subsequent sons of Adam even to now. Overcoming that is what any Son of Adam has to do to enter the New Yerusalelm and Bless the families of Earth and fill Christ's Universe with People free of Adam's curse.
Adam simply told the truth that the woman whom God gave him offered him the fruit and he did partake. All the rest of the baloney above is false. Adam was very faithful unto the Lord after his eyes were opened and he understood the difference between good and evil. Adam is the Ancient of Days who is second in command under Jesus Christ over this world. He is also Michael the archangel.
 
Last edited:
His only credential? Being chosen by God himself is the only credential any prophet would need!

We don't claim the false doctrine of infallibility of the Prophet. Prophets in the bible have made mistakes as well. Fair Enough. Good.

The Book of Mormon begins around 597-596 BC. Jacob and Laban of Genesis 31 was way before that timeframe. The Laban mentioned in Genesis 31 is not the same one that is mentioned in the book of Mormon. That is correct

The Jacob of Genesis 31 is the grandson of Abraham and the Father of the House of Israel. Jacob's name was changed to Israel and from him came the 12 tribes of Israel. It was in the first year of the reign of Zedekiah King of Judah (see 1 Nephi 1). Genesis 31 occurred approximately 1908 BC. They don't relate at all. And what are the false names you are referring to? The use of the artificial words "Jew" & Jesus which are only about 500 years old.

Herod's temple? The LDS leadership didn't even exist during the days of Herod! That is correct. What the Edomite Jews ruling Syrian Palestine today want to do is to recreate Herod's temple as they are all or mostly Edomites of one flavor or another.
Yet LDS leadership wants to help build a temple for anti-christ Edomites.
Eve was deceive by Satan as Genesis 3 tells us. However, that does not mean that the fall was not necessary. Satan means adversary, and applies to humans who are adversaries to Yahweh. If God did not want Adam and Eve to fall, He, knowing the end from the beginning, could have simply kept Satan from going to the earth and kept Adam and Eve away from the tree of knowledge of good and evil. Adam did not mention anyone save to bear false witness against the Creator & Eve. Thus Adam was an Adversary at that time. That is God knew that Satan would tempt Eve and he also knew that Adam and Eve would choose to partake of the forbidden fruit. The Forbidden fruit was to decide good & evil without the Creator's input, which Adam had access to and refused to consult. He knew this before the foundation of the earth and called Jesus to be the Savior before the foundation of the world knowing full well that the fall of mankind would occur and provided a Savior way in advance. If God didn't want it and if it The word/name Jesus did not exist until about 500 years ago when the Edomites controlling the Vatican invented the letter 'J' to trick Christians. Christ's name is YahwehShua, meaning Yahweh Saves. Deluded Christians don't know that who they call Joshua had the same name as YahShua - YahwehShua.
Nor do they realize that calling Christ Geesus is slandering Him.

wasn't necessary, He simply could have avoided the whole thing.

Why else would God send the rest of us to be born into a fallen world? We didn't transgress his laws. Yet God sends us down to a mortal earth as the children of Adam and Eve to experience a fallen world and learn by experience the difference between good and evil. This made Adam and Eve to progress to become more like God.
All of Aryan Christian Israel has been and is being tested to see who they are individually.
Genesis 3:22
22 ¶ And the Lord God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:

Here we read that Adam and Eve progressed to become more like God by knowing good and evil. It was not a matter of knowing, but deciding and defining for themselves what Good and Evil is, with Good being whatever they want, just as Adam did. And this is what all Israelites must overcome to inherit the Kingdom.

Adam simply told the truth that the woman whom God gave him offered him the fruit and he did partake. Adam did not tell the Truth. He told her what He wanted.

All the rest of the baloney above is false. Adam was very faithful unto the Lord after his eyes were opened and he understood the difference between good and evil. Adam is the Ancient of Days who is second in command under Jesus Christ over this world. He is also Michael the archangel. What did Adam do that qualified him to be 2nd in command after YahShua, King of His Universe?
The Covenant between Laban & Yacob binds all of Biblical Israel to today, and Nebuchadnezar stomped Isreal/Yerusalem because they were doing evil and violating the Covenant. Today, the Israelites of America, busy worshiping Lord Esau, are trying to murder their Mother Syria, thus shortening the life of America according to the Law Declared by Yahweh, which may be part of the current Curse on America as stated in Isaiah 5. And LDS leadership never says a single negative thing about USA's habitual perpetual murderous wars, because they are incorporated and subject to the privately owned Washington D.C..
The word 'Jew' in the Book of Mormon misled LDS leadership into supposing that a pack of anti-christ Edomites calling themselves the artificial deceptive word "Jews" are some Divine fulfillment and sent them the granite stones for their "Temple" which is nothing more that a re-creation of Herod's Edomite temple. Why LDS leadership wanted to negate Christ's Fullfillment and build another temple for anti-Christs shows how deceived they were on this subject.
If they were smart, they would take the word "Jew" out of the Book of Mormon, as Jews have no future in the Divine scheme of things, save to punish rebellious Aryan Christian Israelites.
Anti-Christ Edomite Jews is what most Christians have been fooled into thinking are Biblical Yehuda.
In Maccabees, there is mention that The Tribe of Yehuda discovered that the the Spartans are of the Tribe of Yehuda and made friendly & brotherly diplomatic connections. The rest of Greece is also Israelite because the Greek name for Greece is Achean, meaning Brothers.
 
Last edited:
Just disagreeing with posts doesn't make you right nor look smart. So far, you have been wrong about everything. You might want to try using that brain God gave you.
 
Communism is atheistic by its very nature God cannot exist. Communism through tyrannical methodology puts the Government at the highest esteem. No God.

No it's not, since God can be the ultimate source of law and values for a communist society that values God and His community (His people), above profits and money. A communist society that recognizes the existence and authority of God, prioritizes the public good over the vested interests of a few wealthy billionaires. It's your greed and worship of mammon that is truly satanic, not divine communism. YHWH's angels aren't capitalizing on each other's needs, they simply meet them out of love and a sense of obligation.

Act 4:32 And the multitude of them that believed were of one heart and of one soul: neither said any of them that ought of the things which he possessed was his own, but they had all things common.
Act 4:33 And with great power gave the apostles witness of the resurrection of the Lord Jesus: and great grace was upon them all.
Act 4:34 Neither was there any among them that lacked: for as many as were possessors of lands or houses sold them, and brought the prices of the things that were sold,
Act 4:35 And laid them down at the apostles' feet: and distribution was made unto every man according as he had need.
Act 4:36 And Joses, who by the apostles was surnamed Barnabas, (which is, being interpreted, The son of consolation,) a Levite, and of the country of Cyprus,

Act 4:37 Having land, sold it, and brought the money, and laid it at the apostles' feet.

Act 2:42 And they continued stedfastly in the apostles' doctrine and fellowship, and in breaking of bread, and in prayers.
Act 2:43 And fear came upon every soul: and many wonders and signs were done by the apostles.
Act 2:44 And all that believed were together, and had all things common;
Act 2:45 And sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to all men, as every man had need.
Act 2:46 And they, continuing daily with one accord in the temple, and breaking bread from house to house, did eat their meat with gladness and singleness of heart,

Act 2:47 Praising God, and having favour with all the people. And the Lord added to the church daily such as should be saved.
 
The Synthesis is what the dialectical process was designed to produce.
And the Synthesis is probably wrong.
Wars and theatrics follow the same process. They start with a conflict that is increased till a crisis/climax where one side can't keep up. The synthesis is the final resolution of the conflict in the direction that the hidden manipulators of the conflict desire.
 
Last edited:
No it's not, since God can be the ultimate source of law and values for a communist society that values God and His community (His people), above profits and money. A communist society that recognizes the existence and authority of God, prioritizes the public good over the vested interests of a few wealthy billionaires. It's your greed and worship of mammon that is truly satanic, not divine communism. YHWH's angels aren't capitalizing on each other's needs, they simply meet them out of love and a sense of obligation.

Act 4:32 And the multitude of them that believed were of one heart and of one soul: neither said any of them that ought of the things which he possessed was his own, but they had all things common.
Act 4:33 And with great power gave the apostles witness of the resurrection of the Lord Jesus: and great grace was upon them all.
Act 4:34 Neither was there any among them that lacked: for as many as were possessors of lands or houses sold them, and brought the prices of the things that were sold,
Act 4:35 And laid them down at the apostles' feet: and distribution was made unto every man according as he had need.
Act 4:36 And Joses, who by the apostles was surnamed Barnabas, (which is, being interpreted, The son of consolation,) a Levite, and of the country of Cyprus,

Act 4:37 Having land, sold it, and brought the money, and laid it at the apostles' feet.

Act 2:42 And they continued stedfastly in the apostles' doctrine and fellowship, and in breaking of bread, and in prayers.
Act 2:43 And fear came upon every soul: and many wonders and signs were done by the apostles.
Act 2:44 And all that believed were together, and had all things common;
Act 2:45 And sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to all men, as every man had need.
Act 2:46 And they, continuing daily with one accord in the temple, and breaking bread from house to house, did eat their meat with gladness and singleness of heart,

Act 2:47 Praising God, and having favour with all the people. And the Lord added to the church daily such as should be saved.
You are mistaking the most important part of the Kingdom of God. The earth as it is now, is not the kingdom of God. Oh, there is a Church that is an extension of the kingdom of God in Heaven. But, Communism isn't anything like what the Bible teaches. Everywhere Communism has been tried ends up most of the people in poverty. China went to a capitalist system to dig themselves out of a country full of poverty and only the communist party leaders had much wealth in common. Then there is Stalin and many others that have tried communism and the people were brutalized and not with one heart. Why? Because the Communist leaders become sick with the love of money and power. They force the people mato give their possessions to the Party and/or State. The people lose their God-given rights to free moral agency and lose their rights to believe in the All Mighty God, Elohim and his Son, Jesus Christ. Note in Acts 2:44 it says, "And all that believed were together, and had all things in common." What about all those who did not believe in Christ? In a world where people have the freedom to choose good or evil, they would not be forced to share. But, in a communist dictatorship, they must hand over their possessions including their free moral agency which is given by God. Communism is the counterfeit to the Kingdom of God lead by the Godhead of the Father, Son and Holy Ghost. Man is too carnal and to devilish to be able to adhere to the peaceful and free utopia that our Church calls the United Order lead by God, not by man.
 
You are mistaking the most important part of the Kingdom of God. The earth as it is now, is not the kingdom of God. Oh, there is a Church that is an extension of the kingdom of God in Heaven. But, Communism isn't anything like what the Bible teaches. Everywhere Communism has been tried ends up most of the people in poverty. China went to a capitalist system to dig themselves out of a country full of poverty and only the communist party leaders had much wealth in common. Then there is Stalin and many others that have tried communism and the people were brutalized and not with one heart. Why? Because the Communist leaders become sick with the love of money and power. They force the people mato give their possessions to the Party and/or State. The people lose their God-given rights to free moral agency and lose their rights to believe in the All Mighty God, Elohim and his Son, Jesus Christ. Note in Acts 2:44 it says, "And all that believed were together, and had all things in common." What about all those who did not believe in Christ? In a world where people have the freedom to choose good or evil, they would not be forced to share. But, in a communist dictatorship, they must hand over their possessions including their free moral agency which is given by God. Communism is the counterfeit to the Kingdom of God lead by the Godhead of the Father, Son and Holy Ghost. Man is too carnal and to devilish to be able to adhere to the peaceful and free utopia that our Church calls the United Order lead by God, not by man.

So you admit that communism isn't necessarily evil, provided people choose to live in a communist society. Your comments on socialism are filled with cheap capitalist propaganda and rhetoric. It took centuries for capitalism to replace chattel slavery and feudalism. It didn't occur overnight or in one decisive, well-defined victory or event, so why demand that socialism replace capitalism overnight or in one quick victory for it to be valid and effective? The merchants didn't become industrialists until the 19th century when material conditions allowed them to industrialize production. That required technology that wasn't available in the previous centuries when capitalism was comprised of a mercantile class of merchants, under the heel of monarchs and nobles. In the future when technology permits socialism, and then communism will become necessary. Automated systems, robotics, artificial intelligence, self-driving cars, nanotech, and many other technologies are going to gradually but surely replace wage labor, hence the need to socialize and democratize production. The production of goods will no longer be for profit but to simply meet human needs.
 
So you admit that communism isn't necessarily evil, provided people choose to live in a communist society. Your comments on socialism are filled with cheap capitalist propaganda and rhetoric. It took centuries for capitalism to replace chattel slavery and feudalism. It didn't occur overnight or in one decisive, well-defined victory or event, so why demand that socialism replace capitalism overnight or in one quick victory for it to be valid and effective? The merchants didn't become industrialists until the 19th century when material conditions allowed them to industrialize production. That required technology that wasn't available in the previous centuries when capitalism was comprised of a mercantile class of merchants, under the heel of monarchs and nobles. In the future when technology permits socialism, and then communism will become necessary. Automated systems, robotics, artificial intelligence, self-driving cars, nanotech, and many other technologies are going to gradually but surely replace wage labor, hence the need to socialize and democratize production. The production of goods will no longer be for profit but to simply meet human needs.
We had a great apostasy in most of the world from about 70 - 100 A.D. to 1830. When the heavens reopened, it took a while for freedom of thought and the right to own your own property to take hold. So, you are correct. The Constitution made it possible for the U.S. to move towards capitalism with the right to own your own property. The Constitution also made it possible for Jesus to restore his church with freedom of religion and free speech. Capitalism has taken billions of people out of poverty around the world. Communism and other forms of totalitarianism put people into poverty of property ownership and their rights to believe as they choose. When a government is top down heavy handed, freedom of speech, religion and property ownership are squashed by the government. They are not able to exist together. Therefore, as I pointed out, communism is by design evil. As I said, the Marxist utopian belief sounds good on paper. But, when put into practice, it never goes the way they hoped. Instead, it turns into evil almost immediately as people are carnal and devilish. Anywhere it's been tried ends up with thousands, hundreds of thousands and even millions of people being brutally slaughtered. Fascism isn't any better. Communists use fascist techniques.
 
The Lord has only one true and living church. One reason The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is a “living church” is that the living God reveals His will to living prophets and apostles. All other churches are dead and mourn constantly and this is the reason for the cross on all other Christian Churches. The worship the dead Christ while TCOJCOLDS worships the living Christ and has a spire pointing to the resurrecting living Christ.
"Three features—(1) fulness of doctrine, (2) power of the priesthood, and (3) testimony of Jesus Christ—explain why God has declared and why we as His servants maintain that this is the only true and living Church upon the face of the whole earth." - Dallin H. Oaks. Here is the entire massage from Elder Oaks, a current day Apostle of the Lord Jesus Christ: The Only True and Living Church

Do not be threatened? Be humble: "Because of this declaration of the Lord, we refer to this, His Church—our Church—as the “only true Church.” Sometimes we do this in a way that gives great offense to people who belong to other churches or who subscribe to other philosophies. But God has not taught us anything that should cause us to feel superior to other people. Certainly all churches and philosophies have elements of truth in them, some more than others. Certainly God loves all of His children. And certainly His gospel plan is for all of His children, all according to His own timetable."
There’s no such thing as a living god or church. You might feel strongly about that but it doesn’t make it true.

To my knowledge not one person has ever interacted with any god and I’ll bet you are no different. Faith does not equate to fact.
 
This Earth is sustained by and ruled by the Creator thereof. His entire Universe is His Kingdom. The Edomite Jews that murdered the Perfect Man accepted the guilt upon themselves and their posterity. Today they are called Jews, a name they invented to fool Christians; And it has worked very well for them, so far. But in the end they are eliminated as it says in Luke 19:27
 
We had a great apostasy in most of the world from about 70 - 100 A.D. to 1830. When the heavens reopened, it took a while for freedom of thought and the right to own your own property to take hold. So, you are correct. The Constitution made it possible for the U.S. to move towards capitalism with the right to own your own property. The Constitution also made it possible for Jesus to restore his church with freedom of religion and free speech. Capitalism has taken billions of people out of poverty around the world. Communism and other forms of totalitarianism put people into poverty of property ownership and their rights to believe as they choose. When a government is top down heavy handed, freedom of speech, religion and property ownership are squashed by the government. They are not able to exist together. Therefore, as I pointed out, communism is by design evil. As I said, the Marxist utopian belief sounds good on paper. But, when put into practice, it never goes the way they hoped. Instead, it turns into evil almost immediately as people are carnal and devilish. Anywhere it's been tried ends up with thousands, hundreds of thousands and even millions of people being brutally slaughtered. Fascism isn't any better. Communists use fascist techniques.

You're just spouting a bunch of ignorant gobbledygook. First of all, in communism, you can own personal property, you just can't own private property. You obviously don't know the difference between the two. Private property is that which one can use to exploit others, hence housing isn't necessarily "private property", unless you own it to rent it out as a landlord. Most people under capitalism don't own residential property, they rent it or hold a mortgage from a bank, to whom they owe money.

In socialism you have a human right to housing, hence every member of society is housed.

Capitalism under colonialism and now multi-national, corporate imperialism has murdered hundreds of millions of people around the world and has subjugated them under the heel of profit-pursuing, Western big-money capitalists. The British empire in the late 19th century forced China to get hooked on heroin in order to ensure its wealthy ruling class made a profit. British capitalists using state power imposed sanctions on India, prohibiting it from manufacturing its own salt, making it dependent upon Britain for it, among other vital commodities.







Cronyism, imperialism, and war are endemic to capitalism. When we have a small minority of people in society owning the means of production (the facilities, machinery, equipment..etc) and employing people for a wage to produce goods and services for employers to profit, that creates an irresistible incentive for that small wealthy minority and owner class to take control of the state and undermine democracy and freedom.

Unregulated, "laissez faire" capitalism always leads to state-protected monopolies, plutocracy, and the gross exploitation of both workers and consumers. Those who think capitalism is primarily defined by markets are wrong. Markets existed thousands of years before capitalism. Socialism according to Karl Marx, allows markets in the consumer goods sector of the economy before material conditions exist to establish a communist economy and society. Socialism is the process that leads to communism, creating the material conditions that allow it to exist and flourish.

According to Marx, communism is a stateless society, without socioeconomic classes or the need for money. It highly depends on very modern technology and the complete lack of scarcity. When the consumer can easily produce what he or she consumes without the assistance of anyone else, including a government or a private, for-profit company, then that person is truly free.

Capitalism is simply a mode of production that will in the not-too-distant future, become completely obsolete and replaced with a socialized and democratic form of production, where the facilities, machinery, and equipment of production are owned collectively, by the people. We all own the technology together and organize production for the purpose of meeting our needs not for selling what is produced in a marketplace for a profit. Advanced, 21st century technology:

Automated Systems, Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Self-Driving Vehicles, Nanotech..etc






Nanofactory Animation

Advanced 21st-Century Technology will inevitably necessitate the adoption of a mode of production that is not dependent upon profits or wage labor. The system of production that will replace capitalism, is socialism and eventually communism. Systems of production not based on wage labor or the pursuit of profits through the sell of goods in markets.

NO WAGE LABOR = NO PAYING CONSUMERS = NO MARKETS = NO CAPITALISM/CAPITALISTS = SOCIALISM/COMMUNISM = ALL CONSUMERS HAVE CONTROL OVER THE MEANS OF PRODUCTION.

space-colony_5.jpg



Socialism/communism is the future.


 
Last edited:
You're just spouting a bunch of ignorant gobbledygook. First of all, in communism, you can own personal property, you just can't own private property. You obviously don't know the difference between the two. Private property is that which one can use to exploit others, hence housing isn't necessarily "private property", unless you own it to rent it out as a landlord. Most people under capitalism don't own residential property, they rent it or hold a mortgage from a bank, to whom they owe money.

In socialism you have a human right to housing, hence every member of society is housed.

Capitalism under colonialism and now multi-national, corporate imperialism has murdered hundreds of millions of people around the world and has subjugated them under the heel of profit-pursuing, Western big-money capitalists. The British empire in the late 19th century forced China to get hooked on heroin in order to ensure its wealthy ruling class made a profit. British capitalists using state power imposed sanctions on India, prohibiting it from manufacturing its own salt, making it dependent upon Britain for it, among other vital commodities.







Cronyism, imperialism, and war are endemic to capitalism. When we have a small minority of people in society owning the means of production (the facilities, machinery, equipment..etc) and employing people for a wage to produce goods and services for employers to profit, that creates an irresistible incentive for that small wealthy minority and owner class to take control of the state and undermine democracy and freedom.

Unregulated, "laissez faire" capitalism always leads to state-protected monopolies, plutocracy, and the gross exploitation of both workers and consumers. Those who think capitalism is primarily defined by markets are wrong. Markets existed thousands of years before capitalism. Socialism according to Karl Marx, allows markets in the consumer goods sector of the economy before material conditions exist to establish a communist economy and society. Socialism is the process that leads to communism, creating the material conditions that allow it to exist and flourish.

According to Marx, communism is a stateless society, without socioeconomic classes or the need for money. It highly depends on very modern technology and the complete lack of scarcity. When the consumer can easily produce what he or she consumes without the assistance of anyone else, including a government or a private, for-profit company, then that person is truly free.

Capitalism is simply a mode of production that will in the not-too-distant future, become completely obsolete and replaced with a socialized and democratic form of production, where the facilities, machinery, and equipment of production are owned collectively, by the people. We all own the technology together and organize production for the purpose of meeting our needs not for selling what is produced in a marketplace for a profit. Advanced, 21st century technology:

Automated Systems, Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Self-Driving Vehicles, Nanotech..etc






Nanofactory Animation

Advanced 21st-Century Technology will inevitably necessitate the adoption of a mode of production that is not dependent upon profits or wage labor. The system of production that will replace capitalism, is socialism and eventually communism. Systems of production not based on wage labor or the pursuit of profits through the sell of goods in markets.

NO WAGE LABOR = NO PAYING CONSUMERS = NO MARKETS = NO CAPITALISM/CAPITALISTS = SOCIALISM/COMMUNISM = ALL CONSUMERS HAVE CONTROL OVER THE MEANS OF PRODUCTION.

View attachment 710970



Socialism/communism is the future.



LOL you are an idiot. Communism doesn't work and has failed everywhere it was tried. The leaders of the supposed Communist regimes have openly MURDERED Millions of people.
 

Forum List

Back
Top