As found on REALCLEARENERGY this am..........
Here is the main point......a no-brainer which of course would be agreed upon by anybody of sound mind and judgment..............
Only Congress has the power to enact such extensive changes. The EPA’s attempt to bypass the legislative branch is unconstitutional. As Sandra Day O’Connor wrote in FDA vs. Brown & Williamson: “No matter how important, conspicuous, and controversial the issue, and regardless of how likely the public is to hold the Executive Branch politically accountable, an administrative agency’s power to regulate in the public interest must always be grounded in a valid grant of authority from Congress.”
also............
Pruitt will defend federalism. The EPA has repeatedly ignored the rights of states to determine their own policy. Time and time again, it has imposed uniform rules for diverse situations, landscapes, and people. CPP is just one example of such regulations, and according to Pruitt’s attorney, David Rivkin, it would allow the EPA to drive states on issues like developing new power plants.
The Case for Scott Pruitt to Lead the EPA | RealClearEnergy
Of course, the climate Nazi's will likely disagree 100%...........because they are climate Nazi's!! They want federal government control of everything but especially environmental policy.
Here is the main point......a no-brainer which of course would be agreed upon by anybody of sound mind and judgment..............
Only Congress has the power to enact such extensive changes. The EPA’s attempt to bypass the legislative branch is unconstitutional. As Sandra Day O’Connor wrote in FDA vs. Brown & Williamson: “No matter how important, conspicuous, and controversial the issue, and regardless of how likely the public is to hold the Executive Branch politically accountable, an administrative agency’s power to regulate in the public interest must always be grounded in a valid grant of authority from Congress.”
also............
Pruitt will defend federalism. The EPA has repeatedly ignored the rights of states to determine their own policy. Time and time again, it has imposed uniform rules for diverse situations, landscapes, and people. CPP is just one example of such regulations, and according to Pruitt’s attorney, David Rivkin, it would allow the EPA to drive states on issues like developing new power plants.
The Case for Scott Pruitt to Lead the EPA | RealClearEnergy
Of course, the climate Nazi's will likely disagree 100%...........because they are climate Nazi's!! They want federal government control of everything but especially environmental policy.
Last edited:
