has to decide the fate of these children. I have to agree with TK, people of good conscience can be torn by this one. I don't think it has anything to do with disease or laws though, those are just an excuse to send them back when maybe your basic human instinct tells you that they are only children and must be sheltered.no matter what. And after all America at one time embraced this creed;
"Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free;
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore,
Send these, the homeless,
Tempest-tossed to me
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"
Of course in 1886 when the Statue was dedicated the U.S. population was under 60 million and half a continent had more or less been cleared of it's native inhabitants and was waiting to be settled. And of course it was understood the immigrants to be welcomed should be white, preferably protestant. There wasn't much altruism involved in manifest destiny. I'm afraid todays situation is powered by the same dynamics, economy, race and not much morality. The decision won't be informed by altruism but by cold political reasoning. And really does it matter? Who honestly knows what is best for these kids. America isn't exactly an oasis for a large percentage of it's own children. As a matter of fact at times it is hell on earth in places like inner city Chigago. And what do these kids say if you give them a choice, stay, strangers in a strange land, or return to their parents?
And if you open the flood gates won't they eventually have to be slammed, creating an even bigger humanitarian crisis? Like I said, this is one time I'm glad my opinion doesn't matter.