Zone1 One Truth: Should Society Maintain a Moral Compass?

[ding]

Your ignorance was never in doubt, there is no need to continue to demonstrate it. I hope one day you'll comprehend the ignorance you just demonstrated with this post but I'm not hopeful.

Wait. Is there evidence of first life evolving from a long linear chain of nitrogen, carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen in a specific sequence that twists, bends, and folds into a unique three-dimensional structure by accident?

 

[alang1216]

Wait. Is there evidence of first life evolving from a long linear chain of nitrogen, carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen in a specific sequence that twists, bends, and folds into a unique three-dimensional structure by accident?

Which came first, the chicken or the egg?

 

[Zincwarrior]

That seemed to be a misconception he tried to correct, rather than arguing God changed his mind.

God is love. Yaweh is vengeance.

 

[ding]

Which came first, the chicken or the egg?

The egg. You can't tell what something is by how it starts out. Think genetic mutations in statistically valid numbers. That's how new species originate. Of course that doesn't address the first instance of life.

 

[ding]

God is love. Yaweh is vengeance.

That's a misconception.

 

[Zincwarrior]

That's a misconception.

Its accurate. Jesus is about forgiveness and love. Yaweh was about murdering enemies.

 

[Leo123]

Your ignorance was never in doubt, there is no need to continue to demonstrate it. I hope one day you'll comprehend the ignorance you just demonstrated with this post but I'm not hopeful.

First life did not 'evolve' because there was no life from which to evolve. Apparently simple logic is not your strong suit, but you're really good at being a stupid, insulting troll.

 

[ding]

Yaweh was about murdering enemies.

You are wrong. The Israelites crafted narratives about historical events to teach lessons about the covenant, obedience and their relationship with God. God didn't do those things. The Israelites did.

In John 14:9, Jesus tells Philip, "Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father," emphasizing that he perfectly reveals God's character, words, and actions. This statement highlights the intimate unity between Jesus and God, indicating that Jesus is the visible image of the invisible Father.

Key aspects of this statement include:

• Context: Jesus says this in response to Philip asking him to "show us the Father" during the Last Supper.
• Unity: Jesus explains that he is in the Father and the Father is in him, meaning the works he does and words he speaks are from the Father.
• Revelation:Seeing Jesus is equivalent to seeing God because Jesus is the "exact representation" or image of God
  .
  • Purpose: This phrase serves to reassure the disciples of his identity and mission.

Essentially, Jesus is saying that to know what God is like, one should look at him.

 

[alang1216]

First life did not 'evolve' because there was no life from which to evolve. Apparently simple logic is not your strong suit, but you're really good at being a stupid, insulting troll.

Well done! I'm so proud of you, you've come a long way.

 

[Hafar1014]

Opinions swirl through society. There are many opinions, but one truth. Moral relativity (what is right for thee is not right for me) abounds. Those who uphold one truth over opinions are labeled judgmental, discriminatory, bigoted, merciless.

Society can either choose moral relativity or one truth. As far back as Biblical times, societies failed during times of moral relativity and struggled to return to the Rule of Law–or one truth.

What say you? With the “Equality Act”, Congress is pushing American society into moral relativity and even into government regulation/insistence of this moral relativity into churches and faith communities. Is moral relativity the answer, or should we be seeking a society that maintains its moral compass of one truth?

There is no one truth. 10 people see a car accident and you get 10 versions all the truth. Thats why in court you swear to tell the truth not the facts. The problem with the so called equality act is that it includes gender dysmorphism as normal instead of the fact that its a mental illness. Thats not equal or moral. Thats the normalization of mental disorder

 

[Hafar1014]

You are wrong. The Israelites crafted narratives about historical events to teach lessons about the covenant, obedience and their relationship with God. God didn't do those things. The Israelites did.

In John 14:9, Jesus tells Philip, "Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father," emphasizing that he perfectly reveals God's character, words, and actions. This statement highlights the intimate unity between Jesus and God, indicating that Jesus is the visible image of the invisible Father.

Key aspects of this statement include:

• Context: Jesus says this in response to Philip asking him to "show us the Father" during the Last Supper.
• Unity: Jesus explains that he is in the Father and the Father is in him, meaning the works he does and words he speaks are from the Father.
• Revelation:Seeing Jesus is equivalent to seeing God because Jesus is the "exact representation" or image of God
  .
  • Purpose: This phrase serves to reassure the disciples of his identity and mission.

Essentially, Jesus is saying that to know what God is like, one should look at him.

You just defied Jesus as an idol

 

[ding]

You just defied Jesus as an idol

How so?

 

[ding]

The problem with the so called equality act is that it includes gender dysmorphism as normal instead of the fact that its a mental illness.

But according to you, there is no one truth, right? Are you now trying to argue against yourself by declaring you know the one truth about this?

 

[Hafar1014]

But according to you, there is no one truth, right? Are you now trying to argue against yourself by declaring you know the one truth about this?

There are many truths but only one fact defined by valid science. Truth is what one honestly believes and it can be wrong. Facts are defined by valid science.

 

[Hafar1014]

How so?

Revelation:Seeing Jesus is equivalent to seeing God because Jesus is the "exact representation" or image of God"

.Thats an idol a craven image. Jesus has a face name and personality. Thats called dumbing down god so the less intelligent can understand it. The Jewish abstract God with no name is to complex.

 

[Meriweather]

There is no one truth. 10 people see a car accident and you get 10 versions all the truth. Thats why in court you swear to tell the truth not the facts. The problem with the so called equality act is that it includes gender dysmorphism as normal instead of the fact that its a mental illness. Thats not equal or moral. Thats the normalization of mental disorder

The focus is on moral truth--one moral truth. Ten people seeing a car accident has nothing to do with morality, it has to do with recollection and where each focus was. For example, a person with knowledge of cars, might pick up on the make, model, year, and color of the vehicles. Someone else might notice what the driver of one car was doing (talking to a passenger) while another might remember the other driver was scowling as he stepped on the gas. There is quite a lot to see when action is taking place, and people are focused on various pieces of that action. It has nothing to do with morality.

The gender dysmorphism is closer to there being one truth. It should be agreed there is one cause, and that is mental illness. However, is there one moral truth on how to treat these people--both medically and socially. When it comes to people choosing pronouns, no. As I tell students, I have more than enough trouble remembering nearly 200 names, I am not even going to try remembering "preferred pronouns". I add I do care what pronoun they use for me during this trend, which I see as going nowhere and eventually forgotten.

 

[Hafar1014]

The focus is on moral truth--one moral truth. Ten people seeing a car accident has nothing to do with morality, it has to do with recollection and where each focus was. For example, a person with knowledge of cars, might pick up on the make, model, year, and color of the vehicles. Someone else might notice what the driver of one car was doing (talking to a passenger) while another might remember the other driver was scowling as he stepped on the gas. There is quite a lot to see when action is taking place, and people are focused on various pieces of that action. It has nothing to do with morality.

The gender dysmorphism is closer to there being one truth. It should be agreed there is one cause, and that is mental illness. However, is there one moral truth on how to treat these people--both medically and socially. When it comes to people choosing pronouns, no. As I tell students, I have more than enough trouble remembering nearly 200 names, I am not even going to try remembering "preferred pronouns". I add I do care what pronoun they use for me during this trend, which I see as going nowhere and eventually forgotten.

There is no one moral truth. A car accident is a perfect example there will be different versions of who was at fault. Thats morality.
Enabling a mental illness is immoral because it objectively causes harm based on the science that defines it as mental illness.
Is it wrong to kill. That depends on the context or circumstances. The law regards killing as immoral but makes an exception.
When a reasonable person believes serious bodily injury or death is imminent or to stop a rape or kidnapping deadly force is allowed.
Its not truth its context thats needed when you make moral judgments. Truth is what you honestly believe right or wrong

 

[ding]

There are many truths but only one fact defined by valid science. Truth is what one honestly believes and it can be wrong. Facts are defined by valid science.

You are spinning yourself into a pretzel. Even science requires observations, dummy. You don't know the difference between subjective and objective.

 

[ding]

Revelation:Seeing Jesus is equivalent to seeing God because Jesus is the "exact representation" or image of God"

.Thats an idol a craven image. Jesus has a face name and personality. Thats called dumbing down god so the less intelligent can understand it. The Jewish abstract God with no name is to complex.
View attachment 1231064

That's as dumb as your argument about truth.

 

[ding]

There is no one moral truth.

So rape can be moral? You are a dumbass.

Judaism teaches that moral truths are objective and revealed by God, providing a compass for humanity. Core values include justice, loving kindness and holiness. You must not be Jewish because you are constantly making arguments in opposition to Jewish beliefs.