Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Even you know that's not true. How can you violate the laws of the universe before the laws even existed? I'll give you an example: the BB is said to have expanded at faster than the speed of light, why? Because those laws didn't exist yet.Oh, I'm sure you'd like to violate every law of nature so you don't have to face reality but reality says the only way it can begin is to be created from nothing. Bam!It's HOW it began. We still only have theories. Like yours. So suck it up, princess.I can't hear you over your crying that the universe began."The universe began, scientists believe," Like I say every time, it's still a THEORY, not fact. Nobody can see all the way back to the BB. We may all be surprised when that happens.CERN are creation scientists?" The Big Bang model is predicated on the universe being created", "Learn some science".No. You don't know what you are reading. The Big Bang model is predicated on the universe being created. It literally popped into existence and began to expand and cool. Learn some science, dummy.You don't even know what you're ready. Quote the part that says that the universe came from nothing.You asked for the scientific paper and I provided it. Now you want to argue with observations and measurements that were predicted by the Big Bang model?It doesn't elevate the BB from theory though, does it. Science can't see the BB. Suck it up princess.Measurements of the Cosmic Microwave Background Temperature at high redshift by analysis of CO excitation - IOPscienceProve that those two things show that the universe came from nothing, then link it to a real scientific paper. You know you can'tCMB and red shift say otherwise, dummy.It's all still a theory, the word is even in the name, Big Bang Theory. Are you really this stupid?CMB and red shift say otherwise, dummy.You just said it yourself Big Bang THEORY. No scientific proof of that yet.Science doesn’t say that we came from nothing. You ARE nothing.I don't know what that means exactly.I trust, then, that you don't defend the creation story, for example, from a "scientific" angle.No, but I don't read it literally like I assume you do. It was never meant to be read that way.Does that mean you're not supposed to understand it?I have. It says to not make an idol out of a book.
As near as I can tell ancient man knew that the universe was created from nothing 6,000 years before science arrived at the same conclusion.
As near as I can tell ancient man knew that man was a product of that creation 6,000 years before science arrived at the same conclusion.
Actually, science does kinda say that the universe came from nothing. Look into the Big Bang Theory sometime. Scientists say that is where the universe started, but they don't know what caused it, or what came before it.
The linear relation between the temperature of the Cosmic Microwave Background and the cosmological redshift is a fundamental prediction of the standard hot Big Bang model.
Aaahhh! A creation scientist. No wonder. Jackass.
"Did you know that the matter in your body is billions of years old?
According to most astrophysicists, all the matter found in the universe today -- including the matter in people, plants, animals, the earth, stars, and galaxies -- was created at the very first moment of time, thought to be about 13 billion years ago.
The universe began, scientists believe, with every speck of its energy jammed into a very tiny point. This extremely dense point exploded with unimaginable force, creating matter and propelling it outward to make the billions of galaxies of our vast universe. Astrophysicists dubbed this titanic explosion the Big Bang..."
The Big Bang | Exploratorium
www.exploratorium.edu
Because matter and energy cannot exist forever without reaching thermal equilibrium. So it had to have a beginning without violating the law of conservation.Even you know that's not true. How can you violate the laws of the universe before the laws even existed? I'll give you an example: the BB is said to have expanded at faster than the speed of light, why? Because those laws didn't exist yet.Oh, I'm sure you'd like to violate every law of nature so you don't have to face reality but reality says the only way it can begin is to be created from nothing. Bam!It's HOW it began. We still only have theories. Like yours. So suck it up, princess.I can't hear you over your crying that the universe began."The universe began, scientists believe," Like I say every time, it's still a THEORY, not fact. Nobody can see all the way back to the BB. We may all be surprised when that happens.CERN are creation scientists?" The Big Bang model is predicated on the universe being created", "Learn some science".No. You don't know what you are reading. The Big Bang model is predicated on the universe being created. It literally popped into existence and began to expand and cool. Learn some science, dummy.You don't even know what you're ready. Quote the part that says that the universe came from nothing.You asked for the scientific paper and I provided it. Now you want to argue with observations and measurements that were predicted by the Big Bang model?It doesn't elevate the BB from theory though, does it. Science can't see the BB. Suck it up princess.Measurements of the Cosmic Microwave Background Temperature at high redshift by analysis of CO excitation - IOPscienceProve that those two things show that the universe came from nothing, then link it to a real scientific paper. You know you can'tCMB and red shift say otherwise, dummy.It's all still a theory, the word is even in the name, Big Bang Theory. Are you really this stupid?CMB and red shift say otherwise, dummy.You just said it yourself Big Bang THEORY. No scientific proof of that yet.Science doesn’t say that we came from nothing. You ARE nothing.I don't know what that means exactly.I trust, then, that you don't defend the creation story, for example, from a "scientific" angle.No, but I don't read it literally like I assume you do. It was never meant to be read that way.Does that mean you're not supposed to understand it?I have. It says to not make an idol out of a book.
As near as I can tell ancient man knew that the universe was created from nothing 6,000 years before science arrived at the same conclusion.
As near as I can tell ancient man knew that man was a product of that creation 6,000 years before science arrived at the same conclusion.
Actually, science does kinda say that the universe came from nothing. Look into the Big Bang Theory sometime. Scientists say that is where the universe started, but they don't know what caused it, or what came before it.
The linear relation between the temperature of the Cosmic Microwave Background and the cosmological redshift is a fundamental prediction of the standard hot Big Bang model.
Aaahhh! A creation scientist. No wonder. Jackass.
"Did you know that the matter in your body is billions of years old?
According to most astrophysicists, all the matter found in the universe today -- including the matter in people, plants, animals, the earth, stars, and galaxies -- was created at the very first moment of time, thought to be about 13 billion years ago.
The universe began, scientists believe, with every speck of its energy jammed into a very tiny point. This extremely dense point exploded with unimaginable force, creating matter and propelling it outward to make the billions of galaxies of our vast universe. Astrophysicists dubbed this titanic explosion the Big Bang..."
The Big Bang | Exploratorium
www.exploratorium.edu
You are here now arguing against your own existence.Nice theory....popping into existence hardwired to produce beings that know and create. Bam!
The BB violated all the laws with its rapid expansion. Probably because the laws didn't exist yet. Man, are you fucking dense.Because matter and energy cannot exist forever without reaching thermal equilibrium. So it had to have a beginning without violating the law of conservation.Even you know that's not true. How can you violate the laws of the universe before the laws even existed? I'll give you an example: the BB is said to have expanded at faster than the speed of light, why? Because those laws didn't exist yet.Oh, I'm sure you'd like to violate every law of nature so you don't have to face reality but reality says the only way it can begin is to be created from nothing. Bam!It's HOW it began. We still only have theories. Like yours. So suck it up, princess.I can't hear you over your crying that the universe began."The universe began, scientists believe," Like I say every time, it's still a THEORY, not fact. Nobody can see all the way back to the BB. We may all be surprised when that happens.CERN are creation scientists?" The Big Bang model is predicated on the universe being created", "Learn some science".No. You don't know what you are reading. The Big Bang model is predicated on the universe being created. It literally popped into existence and began to expand and cool. Learn some science, dummy.You don't even know what you're ready. Quote the part that says that the universe came from nothing.You asked for the scientific paper and I provided it. Now you want to argue with observations and measurements that were predicted by the Big Bang model?It doesn't elevate the BB from theory though, does it. Science can't see the BB. Suck it up princess.Measurements of the Cosmic Microwave Background Temperature at high redshift by analysis of CO excitation - IOPscienceProve that those two things show that the universe came from nothing, then link it to a real scientific paper. You know you can'tCMB and red shift say otherwise, dummy.It's all still a theory, the word is even in the name, Big Bang Theory. Are you really this stupid?CMB and red shift say otherwise, dummy.You just said it yourself Big Bang THEORY. No scientific proof of that yet.Science doesn’t say that we came from nothing. You ARE nothing.I don't know what that means exactly.I trust, then, that you don't defend the creation story, for example, from a "scientific" angle.No, but I don't read it literally like I assume you do. It was never meant to be read that way.Does that mean you're not supposed to understand it?I have. It says to not make an idol out of a book.
As near as I can tell ancient man knew that the universe was created from nothing 6,000 years before science arrived at the same conclusion.
As near as I can tell ancient man knew that man was a product of that creation 6,000 years before science arrived at the same conclusion.
Actually, science does kinda say that the universe came from nothing. Look into the Big Bang Theory sometime. Scientists say that is where the universe started, but they don't know what caused it, or what came before it.
The linear relation between the temperature of the Cosmic Microwave Background and the cosmological redshift is a fundamental prediction of the standard hot Big Bang model.
Aaahhh! A creation scientist. No wonder. Jackass.
"Did you know that the matter in your body is billions of years old?
According to most astrophysicists, all the matter found in the universe today -- including the matter in people, plants, animals, the earth, stars, and galaxies -- was created at the very first moment of time, thought to be about 13 billion years ago.
The universe began, scientists believe, with every speck of its energy jammed into a very tiny point. This extremely dense point exploded with unimaginable force, creating matter and propelling it outward to make the billions of galaxies of our vast universe. Astrophysicists dubbed this titanic explosion the Big Bang..."
The Big Bang | Exploratorium
www.exploratorium.edu
That's crazy talk. Do you have a link for thatThe BB violated all the laws with its rapid expansion. Probably because the laws didn't exist yet. Man, are you fucking dense.Because matter and energy cannot exist forever without reaching thermal equilibrium. So it had to have a beginning without violating the law of conservation.Even you know that's not true. How can you violate the laws of the universe before the laws even existed? I'll give you an example: the BB is said to have expanded at faster than the speed of light, why? Because those laws didn't exist yet.Oh, I'm sure you'd like to violate every law of nature so you don't have to face reality but reality says the only way it can begin is to be created from nothing. Bam!It's HOW it began. We still only have theories. Like yours. So suck it up, princess.I can't hear you over your crying that the universe began."The universe began, scientists believe," Like I say every time, it's still a THEORY, not fact. Nobody can see all the way back to the BB. We may all be surprised when that happens.CERN are creation scientists?" The Big Bang model is predicated on the universe being created", "Learn some science".No. You don't know what you are reading. The Big Bang model is predicated on the universe being created. It literally popped into existence and began to expand and cool. Learn some science, dummy.You don't even know what you're ready. Quote the part that says that the universe came from nothing.You asked for the scientific paper and I provided it. Now you want to argue with observations and measurements that were predicted by the Big Bang model?It doesn't elevate the BB from theory though, does it. Science can't see the BB. Suck it up princess.Measurements of the Cosmic Microwave Background Temperature at high redshift by analysis of CO excitation - IOPscienceProve that those two things show that the universe came from nothing, then link it to a real scientific paper. You know you can'tCMB and red shift say otherwise, dummy.It's all still a theory, the word is even in the name, Big Bang Theory. Are you really this stupid?CMB and red shift say otherwise, dummy.You just said it yourself Big Bang THEORY. No scientific proof of that yet.Science doesn’t say that we came from nothing. You ARE nothing.I don't know what that means exactly.I trust, then, that you don't defend the creation story, for example, from a "scientific" angle.No, but I don't read it literally like I assume you do. It was never meant to be read that way.Does that mean you're not supposed to understand it?I have. It says to not make an idol out of a book.
As near as I can tell ancient man knew that the universe was created from nothing 6,000 years before science arrived at the same conclusion.
As near as I can tell ancient man knew that man was a product of that creation 6,000 years before science arrived at the same conclusion.
Actually, science does kinda say that the universe came from nothing. Look into the Big Bang Theory sometime. Scientists say that is where the universe started, but they don't know what caused it, or what came before it.
The linear relation between the temperature of the Cosmic Microwave Background and the cosmological redshift is a fundamental prediction of the standard hot Big Bang model.
Aaahhh! A creation scientist. No wonder. Jackass.
"Did you know that the matter in your body is billions of years old?
According to most astrophysicists, all the matter found in the universe today -- including the matter in people, plants, animals, the earth, stars, and galaxies -- was created at the very first moment of time, thought to be about 13 billion years ago.
The universe began, scientists believe, with every speck of its energy jammed into a very tiny point. This extremely dense point exploded with unimaginable force, creating matter and propelling it outward to make the billions of galaxies of our vast universe. Astrophysicists dubbed this titanic explosion the Big Bang..."
The Big Bang | Exploratorium
www.exploratorium.edu
According to you you aren't even here because the universe wasn't hardwired to create beings that know and create.I'd agree with you, but then we'd both be wrong.You are here now arguing against your own existence.Nice theory....popping into existence hardwired to produce beings that know and create. Bam!
How the Big Bang Theory WorksThat's crazy talk. Do you have a link for thatThe BB violated all the laws with its rapid expansion. Probably because the laws didn't exist yet. Man, are you fucking dense.Because matter and energy cannot exist forever without reaching thermal equilibrium. So it had to have a beginning without violating the law of conservation.Even you know that's not true. How can you violate the laws of the universe before the laws even existed? I'll give you an example: the BB is said to have expanded at faster than the speed of light, why? Because those laws didn't exist yet.Oh, I'm sure you'd like to violate every law of nature so you don't have to face reality but reality says the only way it can begin is to be created from nothing. Bam!It's HOW it began. We still only have theories. Like yours. So suck it up, princess.I can't hear you over your crying that the universe began."The universe began, scientists believe," Like I say every time, it's still a THEORY, not fact. Nobody can see all the way back to the BB. We may all be surprised when that happens.CERN are creation scientists?" The Big Bang model is predicated on the universe being created", "Learn some science".No. You don't know what you are reading. The Big Bang model is predicated on the universe being created. It literally popped into existence and began to expand and cool. Learn some science, dummy.You don't even know what you're ready. Quote the part that says that the universe came from nothing.You asked for the scientific paper and I provided it. Now you want to argue with observations and measurements that were predicted by the Big Bang model?It doesn't elevate the BB from theory though, does it. Science can't see the BB. Suck it up princess.Measurements of the Cosmic Microwave Background Temperature at high redshift by analysis of CO excitation - IOPscienceProve that those two things show that the universe came from nothing, then link it to a real scientific paper. You know you can'tCMB and red shift say otherwise, dummy.It's all still a theory, the word is even in the name, Big Bang Theory. Are you really this stupid?CMB and red shift say otherwise, dummy.You just said it yourself Big Bang THEORY. No scientific proof of that yet.Science doesn’t say that we came from nothing. You ARE nothing.I don't know what that means exactly.I trust, then, that you don't defend the creation story, for example, from a "scientific" angle.No, but I don't read it literally like I assume you do. It was never meant to be read that way.Does that mean you're not supposed to understand it?I have. It says to not make an idol out of a book.
As near as I can tell ancient man knew that the universe was created from nothing 6,000 years before science arrived at the same conclusion.
As near as I can tell ancient man knew that man was a product of that creation 6,000 years before science arrived at the same conclusion.
Actually, science does kinda say that the universe came from nothing. Look into the Big Bang Theory sometime. Scientists say that is where the universe started, but they don't know what caused it, or what came before it.
The linear relation between the temperature of the Cosmic Microwave Background and the cosmological redshift is a fundamental prediction of the standard hot Big Bang model.
Aaahhh! A creation scientist. No wonder. Jackass.
"Did you know that the matter in your body is billions of years old?
According to most astrophysicists, all the matter found in the universe today -- including the matter in people, plants, animals, the earth, stars, and galaxies -- was created at the very first moment of time, thought to be about 13 billion years ago.
The universe began, scientists believe, with every speck of its energy jammed into a very tiny point. This extremely dense point exploded with unimaginable force, creating matter and propelling it outward to make the billions of galaxies of our vast universe. Astrophysicists dubbed this titanic explosion the Big Bang..."
The Big Bang | Exploratorium
www.exploratorium.edu
I've not spoken on that hardwired theory of yours. Could be, there seems to be life all over the universe. How's that?According to you you aren't even here because the universe wasn't hardwired to create beings that know and create.I'd agree with you, but then we'd both be wrong.You are here now arguing against your own existence.Nice theory....popping into existence hardwired to produce beings that know and create. Bam!
Was that peer reviewed and published in a scientific journal?How the Big Bang Theory WorksThat's crazy talk. Do you have a link for thatThe BB violated all the laws with its rapid expansion. Probably because the laws didn't exist yet. Man, are you fucking dense.Because matter and energy cannot exist forever without reaching thermal equilibrium. So it had to have a beginning without violating the law of conservation.Even you know that's not true. How can you violate the laws of the universe before the laws even existed? I'll give you an example: the BB is said to have expanded at faster than the speed of light, why? Because those laws didn't exist yet.Oh, I'm sure you'd like to violate every law of nature so you don't have to face reality but reality says the only way it can begin is to be created from nothing. Bam!It's HOW it began. We still only have theories. Like yours. So suck it up, princess.I can't hear you over your crying that the universe began."The universe began, scientists believe," Like I say every time, it's still a THEORY, not fact. Nobody can see all the way back to the BB. We may all be surprised when that happens.CERN are creation scientists?" The Big Bang model is predicated on the universe being created", "Learn some science".No. You don't know what you are reading. The Big Bang model is predicated on the universe being created. It literally popped into existence and began to expand and cool. Learn some science, dummy.You don't even know what you're ready. Quote the part that says that the universe came from nothing.You asked for the scientific paper and I provided it. Now you want to argue with observations and measurements that were predicted by the Big Bang model?It doesn't elevate the BB from theory though, does it. Science can't see the BB. Suck it up princess.Measurements of the Cosmic Microwave Background Temperature at high redshift by analysis of CO excitation - IOPscienceProve that those two things show that the universe came from nothing, then link it to a real scientific paper. You know you can'tCMB and red shift say otherwise, dummy.It's all still a theory, the word is even in the name, Big Bang Theory. Are you really this stupid?CMB and red shift say otherwise, dummy.You just said it yourself Big Bang THEORY. No scientific proof of that yet.Science doesn’t say that we came from nothing. You ARE nothing.I don't know what that means exactly.I trust, then, that you don't defend the creation story, for example, from a "scientific" angle.No, but I don't read it literally like I assume you do. It was never meant to be read that way.Does that mean you're not supposed to understand it?I have. It says to not make an idol out of a book.
As near as I can tell ancient man knew that the universe was created from nothing 6,000 years before science arrived at the same conclusion.
As near as I can tell ancient man knew that man was a product of that creation 6,000 years before science arrived at the same conclusion.
Actually, science does kinda say that the universe came from nothing. Look into the Big Bang Theory sometime. Scientists say that is where the universe started, but they don't know what caused it, or what came before it.
The linear relation between the temperature of the Cosmic Microwave Background and the cosmological redshift is a fundamental prediction of the standard hot Big Bang model.
Aaahhh! A creation scientist. No wonder. Jackass.
"Did you know that the matter in your body is billions of years old?
According to most astrophysicists, all the matter found in the universe today -- including the matter in people, plants, animals, the earth, stars, and galaxies -- was created at the very first moment of time, thought to be about 13 billion years ago.
The universe began, scientists believe, with every speck of its energy jammed into a very tiny point. This extremely dense point exploded with unimaginable force, creating matter and propelling it outward to make the billions of galaxies of our vast universe. Astrophysicists dubbed this titanic explosion the Big Bang..."
The Big Bang | Exploratorium
www.exploratorium.edu
"The early inflationary period of the big bang appears to violate the rule that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. "
Looks like another BIG WIN for me!
That would be totally consistent with the universe being hardwired to produce beings that know and create.I've not spoken on that hardwired theory of yours. Could be, there seems to be life all over the universe. How's that?According to you you aren't even here because the universe wasn't hardwired to create beings that know and create.I'd agree with you, but then we'd both be wrong.You are here now arguing against your own existence.Nice theory....popping into existence hardwired to produce beings that know and create. Bam!
You can't dispute the facts so you attack the writer. EPIC FAIL!Was that peer reviewed and published in a scientific journal?How the Big Bang Theory WorksThat's crazy talk. Do you have a link for thatThe BB violated all the laws with its rapid expansion. Probably because the laws didn't exist yet. Man, are you fucking dense.Because matter and energy cannot exist forever without reaching thermal equilibrium. So it had to have a beginning without violating the law of conservation.Even you know that's not true. How can you violate the laws of the universe before the laws even existed? I'll give you an example: the BB is said to have expanded at faster than the speed of light, why? Because those laws didn't exist yet.Oh, I'm sure you'd like to violate every law of nature so you don't have to face reality but reality says the only way it can begin is to be created from nothing. Bam!It's HOW it began. We still only have theories. Like yours. So suck it up, princess.I can't hear you over your crying that the universe began."The universe began, scientists believe," Like I say every time, it's still a THEORY, not fact. Nobody can see all the way back to the BB. We may all be surprised when that happens.CERN are creation scientists?" The Big Bang model is predicated on the universe being created", "Learn some science".No. You don't know what you are reading. The Big Bang model is predicated on the universe being created. It literally popped into existence and began to expand and cool. Learn some science, dummy.You don't even know what you're ready. Quote the part that says that the universe came from nothing.You asked for the scientific paper and I provided it. Now you want to argue with observations and measurements that were predicted by the Big Bang model?It doesn't elevate the BB from theory though, does it. Science can't see the BB. Suck it up princess.Measurements of the Cosmic Microwave Background Temperature at high redshift by analysis of CO excitation - IOPscienceProve that those two things show that the universe came from nothing, then link it to a real scientific paper. You know you can'tCMB and red shift say otherwise, dummy.It's all still a theory, the word is even in the name, Big Bang Theory. Are you really this stupid?CMB and red shift say otherwise, dummy.You just said it yourself Big Bang THEORY. No scientific proof of that yet.Science doesn’t say that we came from nothing. You ARE nothing.I don't know what that means exactly.I trust, then, that you don't defend the creation story, for example, from a "scientific" angle.No, but I don't read it literally like I assume you do. It was never meant to be read that way.Does that mean you're not supposed to understand it?I have. It says to not make an idol out of a book.
As near as I can tell ancient man knew that the universe was created from nothing 6,000 years before science arrived at the same conclusion.
As near as I can tell ancient man knew that man was a product of that creation 6,000 years before science arrived at the same conclusion.
Actually, science does kinda say that the universe came from nothing. Look into the Big Bang Theory sometime. Scientists say that is where the universe started, but they don't know what caused it, or what came before it.
The linear relation between the temperature of the Cosmic Microwave Background and the cosmological redshift is a fundamental prediction of the standard hot Big Bang model.
Aaahhh! A creation scientist. No wonder. Jackass.
"Did you know that the matter in your body is billions of years old?
According to most astrophysicists, all the matter found in the universe today -- including the matter in people, plants, animals, the earth, stars, and galaxies -- was created at the very first moment of time, thought to be about 13 billion years ago.
The universe began, scientists believe, with every speck of its energy jammed into a very tiny point. This extremely dense point exploded with unimaginable force, creating matter and propelling it outward to make the billions of galaxies of our vast universe. Astrophysicists dubbed this titanic explosion the Big Bang..."
The Big Bang | Exploratorium
www.exploratorium.edu
"The early inflationary period of the big bang appears to violate the rule that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. "
Looks like another BIG WIN for me!
You're just a fucking idiot. You're going on ignore.That would be totally consistent with the universe being hardwired to produce beings that know and create.I've not spoken on that hardwired theory of yours. Could be, there seems to be life all over the universe. How's that?According to you you aren't even here because the universe wasn't hardwired to create beings that know and create.I'd agree with you, but then we'd both be wrong.You are here now arguing against your own existence.Nice theory....popping into existence hardwired to produce beings that know and create. Bam!
P.S. I love how you argued against the Big Bang, science denier.
So that's a no?You can't dispute the facts so you attack the writer. EPIC FAIL!Was that peer reviewed and published in a scientific journal?How the Big Bang Theory WorksThat's crazy talk. Do you have a link for thatThe BB violated all the laws with its rapid expansion. Probably because the laws didn't exist yet. Man, are you fucking dense.Because matter and energy cannot exist forever without reaching thermal equilibrium. So it had to have a beginning without violating the law of conservation.Even you know that's not true. How can you violate the laws of the universe before the laws even existed? I'll give you an example: the BB is said to have expanded at faster than the speed of light, why? Because those laws didn't exist yet.Oh, I'm sure you'd like to violate every law of nature so you don't have to face reality but reality says the only way it can begin is to be created from nothing. Bam!It's HOW it began. We still only have theories. Like yours. So suck it up, princess.I can't hear you over your crying that the universe began."The universe began, scientists believe," Like I say every time, it's still a THEORY, not fact. Nobody can see all the way back to the BB. We may all be surprised when that happens.CERN are creation scientists?" The Big Bang model is predicated on the universe being created", "Learn some science".No. You don't know what you are reading. The Big Bang model is predicated on the universe being created. It literally popped into existence and began to expand and cool. Learn some science, dummy.You don't even know what you're ready. Quote the part that says that the universe came from nothing.You asked for the scientific paper and I provided it. Now you want to argue with observations and measurements that were predicted by the Big Bang model?It doesn't elevate the BB from theory though, does it. Science can't see the BB. Suck it up princess.Measurements of the Cosmic Microwave Background Temperature at high redshift by analysis of CO excitation - IOPscienceProve that those two things show that the universe came from nothing, then link it to a real scientific paper. You know you can'tCMB and red shift say otherwise, dummy.It's all still a theory, the word is even in the name, Big Bang Theory. Are you really this stupid?CMB and red shift say otherwise, dummy.You just said it yourself Big Bang THEORY. No scientific proof of that yet.Science doesn’t say that we came from nothing. You ARE nothing.I don't know what that means exactly.I trust, then, that you don't defend the creation story, for example, from a "scientific" angle.No, but I don't read it literally like I assume you do. It was never meant to be read that way.Does that mean you're not supposed to understand it?I have. It says to not make an idol out of a book.
As near as I can tell ancient man knew that the universe was created from nothing 6,000 years before science arrived at the same conclusion.
As near as I can tell ancient man knew that man was a product of that creation 6,000 years before science arrived at the same conclusion.
Actually, science does kinda say that the universe came from nothing. Look into the Big Bang Theory sometime. Scientists say that is where the universe started, but they don't know what caused it, or what came before it.
The linear relation between the temperature of the Cosmic Microwave Background and the cosmological redshift is a fundamental prediction of the standard hot Big Bang model.
Aaahhh! A creation scientist. No wonder. Jackass.
"Did you know that the matter in your body is billions of years old?
According to most astrophysicists, all the matter found in the universe today -- including the matter in people, plants, animals, the earth, stars, and galaxies -- was created at the very first moment of time, thought to be about 13 billion years ago.
The universe began, scientists believe, with every speck of its energy jammed into a very tiny point. This extremely dense point exploded with unimaginable force, creating matter and propelling it outward to make the billions of galaxies of our vast universe. Astrophysicists dubbed this titanic explosion the Big Bang..."
The Big Bang | Exploratorium
www.exploratorium.edu
"The early inflationary period of the big bang appears to violate the rule that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. "
Looks like another BIG WIN for me!
You can't ignore me. I've already hatched my eggs in your brain.You're just a fucking idiot. You're going on ignore.That would be totally consistent with the universe being hardwired to produce beings that know and create.I've not spoken on that hardwired theory of yours. Could be, there seems to be life all over the universe. How's that?According to you you aren't even here because the universe wasn't hardwired to create beings that know and create.I'd agree with you, but then we'd both be wrong.You are here now arguing against your own existence.Nice theory....popping into existence hardwired to produce beings that know and create. Bam!
P.S. I love how you argued against the Big Bang, science denier.
Doesn't explain why god is waiting so long to fix things.Because we rationalize wrong as right instead of being accountable. You more than anyone knows that, right?Why? Or you don't know that either?Us.What's taking him so long?"I am making everything new"__The Lord Jesus Rev.21:5
Nothing on this earth has the power to defeat the finished work of the
Lord Jesus. "It is finished" said Jesus while on The Cross. Here are
the most powerful finished events in all of human history. No power
n the Universe can defeat these:
{1} The Cross -- the power of reconciliation, forgiveness, and restoration -- "being
justified by faith we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ" Romans 5:1
{2} The Resurrection -- the power of that Empty Tomb. He lives. He is alive.
He has conquered Death for us -- we now have eternal life.
{3} The Ascension -- the power of "I go to my Father" , , , "all authority in
Heaven and on earth has been give to me" Matthew 28:18
{4} The Exaltation -- the power of being now seated at the right hand of the
Almighty Sovereign God
The Bible is the true story of God and His Plan to set the world right again.
Yes , , ,
The Bible tells the true story of how God will Christianize the world and
successfully carry out His Son's Great Commission -- to go and make disciples
of all nations -- commanded at the very end of Matthew's gospel.
God is going to fix the world. The world is now broken -- but God is going to
fix it. Hope lives. Love conquers. Victory. The Cross wins the war for the world.
Evil is defeated. The Good wins. The world will be Christianized before the Lord
Jesus returns. The yeast of the gospel will make disciples of all the nations through
the supernatural power of the Holy Spirit who uses the plain simple gospel message
to regenerate the hearts of men and to enable them to believe in Jesus as their
Savior and then to understand the Bible, as the Holy Spirit begins the process
of creating the fruits of the Holy Spirit in their lives , , ,
Step one is John 3:3 -- you must be born again {regenerated}
Step two is John 3:16 -- you must believe in Jesus as your Savior
Step three is Galatians 5:22-23 -- you must allow the Holy Spirit
o produce these 8 qualities within your heart , , ,
Love
Joy
Forbearance
Kindness
Goodness
Faithfulness
Gentleness
Self-control
The Holy Spirit produces these 8 qualities in the hearts of humans.
This process is what finally fixes the world.
"I am making everything new"__The Lord Jesus
"And I heard a loud voice from the throne saying, “Look! God’s dwelling
place is now among the people, and he will dwell with them. They will be
his people, and God himself will be with them and be their God. ‘He will
wipe every tear from their eyes. There will be no more death’ or mourning
or crying or pain, for the old order of things has passed away.” Rev. 21:3-4
JAG