The Bernie Sanders "Fairness State"

What is more ideal?

  • To pay higher taxes to ensure everyone is payed for

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • To pay lower taxes to encourage independence and self managment

    Votes: 5 100.0%

  • Total voters
    5
We could lower taxes and help people if paranoid right wingers would stop insisting that we have to spend more on the military than the rest of the planet combined.
 
We could lower taxes and help people if paranoid right wingers would stop insisting that we have to spend more on the military than the rest of the planet combined.

I agree, we raked in 3 trillion in taxes last year, there definitely could be wiser spending on both sides.
 
Your poll makes no sense. They're not comparable, plus it's a loaded question.

You're new at this huh?

What the hell does "everyone is payed [sic] for" even mean?

:dunno:
 
Look Bernie Sanders is done, you can stick a fork in him. He ran some caucus states but those are in no way considered a show of support. He'll probably win another today, Wyoming. Then there's only 1 more caucus state left. Typically Caucus states will go for the underdog, because underdog supporters will go through the pain to sitting through a 3 hour meeting to cast a vote. They typically represent less than 1% of either party that bothers to show up. The are the biggest joke to voter disenfranchisement in this nation today. Overseas military, parents with young children, the elderly, the sick, and people who work during the caucus time, cannot show up. Had these states been primary states where several days of voting are done along with mail in ballots Hillary Clinton would have won them all, and Sanders would be a distant memory right now. In the open primary states, Independents can vote, and there was a lot of Operation Bernie voting going on by Republicans. Republicans voting for Bernie, because they know they can wipe him out in the General.

We're headed into several large CLOSED primaries where Sanders has been getting clobbered. New York, Pennsylvania, Connecticut, California.

At this time, It is mathematically impossible for Bernie Sanders to close this gap. Hillary Clinton has a 700 delegate vote lead, along with a 2.4 million vote lead. It's only going to get worse from here on out. He would have to win every one of states left, and not only win them, but win them big by 74%,. Even then he would have to convince 700 Democrat Super Delegates to dump the party faithful, Hillary Clinton, and support him. They're not going to do that for someone that changed changed his party status to run on this ticket, and one who has never worked or supported other Democrats in their races.
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2016/04/01/feel-the-math/?_r=0
It’s Really Hard To Get Bernie Sanders 988 More Delegates
Bernie Sanders Is Even Less Competitive Than He Appears
Bernie Sanders’s path to the nomination is getting very narrow


bernie-sanders-cartoon-englehart.jpg
 
Look Bernie Sanders is done, you can stick a fork in him. He ran some caucus states but those are in no way considered a show of support. He'll probably win another today, Wyoming. Then there's only 1 more caucus state left. Typically Caucus states will go for the underdog, because underdog supporters will go through the pain to sitting through a 3 hour meeting to cast a vote. They typically represent less than 1% of either party that bothers to show up. The are the biggest joke to voter disenfranchisement in this nation today. Overseas military, parents with young children, the elderly, the sick, and people who work during the caucus time, cannot show up. Had these states been primary states where several days of voting are done along with mail in ballots Hillary Clinton would have won them all, and Sanders would be a distant memory right now. In the open primary states, Independents can vote, and there was a lot of Operation Bernie voting going on by Republicans. Republicans voting for Bernie, because they know they can wipe him out in the General.

We're headed into several large CLOSED primaries where Sanders has been getting clobbered. New York, Pennsylvania, Connecticut, California.

At this time, It is mathematically impossible for Bernie Sanders to close this gap. Hillary Clinton has a 700 delegate vote lead, along with a 2.4 million vote lead. It's only going to get worse from here on out. He would have to win every one of states left, and not only win them, but win them big by 74%,. Even then he would have to convince 700 Democrat Super Delegates to dump the party faithful, Hillary Clinton, and support him. They're not going to do that for someone that changed changed his party status to run on this ticket, and one who has never worked or supported other Democrats in their races.
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2016/04/01/feel-the-math/?_r=0
It’s Really Hard To Get Bernie Sanders 988 More Delegates
Bernie Sanders Is Even Less Competitive Than He Appears
Bernie Sanders’s path to the nomination is getting very narrow


bernie-sanders-cartoon-englehart.jpg

How long have you been cut-n-pasting this same post now? A month?
 
We could lower taxes and help people if paranoid right wingers would stop insisting that we have to spend more on the military than the rest of the planet combined.

I agree. Since the US is not in a state of war, it should disband its standing army.
 
Your poll makes no sense. They're not comparable, plus it's a loaded question.

You're new at this huh?

What the hell does "everyone is payed [sic] for" even mean?

:dunno:

"everyone is payed for" meaning healthcare and college tuition being payed for everyone through an increase in taxes. Very simple question I asked.

They are comparable btw, I ask if you prefer a system that encourages fiscal self management or prefer a system where fiscal self management is not as necessary because more is paid for through taxes.
 
I agree. Since the US is not in a state of war, it should disband its standing army.

We could just stop maintaining a military presence across the entire planet. We could also stop buying redundant military hardware. You know, like thousands of tanks the military doesn't need/want as well as outdated aircraft.
 
Agree with #8.
Especially the strict Consitutionalists should be 'up in arms' about the central government maintaining such an overwhelming standing army. No uprising of any imaginable proportions could withstand this force. Compared with America's previous wartimes, WWII never ended.
 
If he thinks, you already ascribe more to him than almost all the other 'candidates'.
 
Disingenuous OP as what it really means is we tax the rich at a much higher rate to redistribute more wealth. We have had a War on Poverty in one form or another since 1935.
 
There might actually be an other alternative? Taxation should be based on percentage of income, fair is fair. Rich and the poor held to the same economic standard? Wow mind boggling. Why NOT?
 
We could lower taxes and help people if paranoid right wingers would stop insisting that we have to spend more on the military than the rest of the planet combined.
You're right. And we could do the same by ending the wholly counterproductive War On Drugs. There is a better way to deal with the situation and it won't cost even ten percent of what is spent on it now.
 
Look Bernie Sanders is done, you can stick a fork in him. He ran some caucus states but those are in no way considered a show of support. He'll probably win another today, Wyoming. Then there's only 1 more caucus state left. Typically Caucus states will go for the underdog, because underdog supporters will go through the pain to sitting through a 3 hour meeting to cast a vote. They typically represent less than 1% of either party that bothers to show up. The are the biggest joke to voter disenfranchisement in this nation today. Overseas military, parents with young children, the elderly, the sick, and people who work during the caucus time, cannot show up. Had these states been primary states where several days of voting are done along with mail in ballots Hillary Clinton would have won them all, and Sanders would be a distant memory right now. In the open primary states, Independents can vote, and there was a lot of Operation Bernie voting going on by Republicans. Republicans voting for Bernie, because they know they can wipe him out in the General.

We're headed into several large CLOSED primaries where Sanders has been getting clobbered. New York, Pennsylvania, Connecticut, California.

At this time, It is mathematically impossible for Bernie Sanders to close this gap. Hillary Clinton has a 700 delegate vote lead, along with a 2.4 million vote lead. It's only going to get worse from here on out. He would have to win every one of states left, and not only win them, but win them big by 74%,. Even then he would have to convince 700 Democrat Super Delegates to dump the party faithful, Hillary Clinton, and support him. They're not going to do that for someone that changed changed his party status to run on this ticket, and one who has never worked or supported other Democrats in their races.
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2016/04/01/feel-the-math/?_r=0
It’s Really Hard To Get Bernie Sanders 988 More Delegates
Bernie Sanders Is Even Less Competitive Than He Appears
Bernie Sanders’s path to the nomination is getting very narrow


bernie-sanders-cartoon-englehart.jpg

Let's see what Bernie has to say about that.

 
Look Bernie Sanders is done, you can stick a fork in him. He ran some caucus states but those are in no way considered a show of support. He'll probably win another today, Wyoming. Then there's only 1 more caucus state left. Typically Caucus states will go for the underdog, because underdog supporters will go through the pain to sitting through a 3 hour meeting to cast a vote. They typically represent less than 1% of either party that bothers to show up. The are the biggest joke to voter disenfranchisement in this nation today. Overseas military, parents with young children, the elderly, the sick, and people who work during the caucus time, cannot show up. Had these states been primary states where several days of voting are done along with mail in ballots Hillary Clinton would have won them all, and Sanders would be a distant memory right now. In the open primary states, Independents can vote, and there was a lot of Operation Bernie voting going on by Republicans. Republicans voting for Bernie, because they know they can wipe him out in the General.

We're headed into several large CLOSED primaries where Sanders has been getting clobbered. New York, Pennsylvania, Connecticut, California.

At this time, It is mathematically impossible for Bernie Sanders to close this gap. Hillary Clinton has a 700 delegate vote lead, along with a 2.4 million vote lead. It's only going to get worse from here on out. He would have to win every one of states left, and not only win them, but win them big by 74%,. Even then he would have to convince 700 Democrat Super Delegates to dump the party faithful, Hillary Clinton, and support him. They're not going to do that for someone that changed changed his party status to run on this ticket, and one who has never worked or supported other Democrats in their races.
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2016/04/01/feel-the-math/?_r=0
It’s Really Hard To Get Bernie Sanders 988 More Delegates
Bernie Sanders Is Even Less Competitive Than He Appears
Bernie Sanders’s path to the nomination is getting very narrow


bernie-sanders-cartoon-englehart.jpg

Let's see what Bernie has to say about that.




:lmao:
Any idea who the impressionist is? He sounds Canadian.
 

Forum List

Back
Top