You're stupid since I said it doesn't matter how many universes you think there are the same problem with your theory exists. Infinite regress is impossible.Not true. I didn't mean this universe stupid. A universe before ours.The universe did not always exist because if it had you would have happened already, having had an eternity to do so. It doesn't matter how many universes you think there are, the same problem exists with your theory.
Infinite Regress is Impossible
1. We observe trillions and trillions of cause and effects in nature, and no hard evidence something comes from nothing, which is an overwhelming preponderance of evidence beyond a reasonable doubt for causation. But if there is this infinite regress you would have happened already having had an eternity do so. And you would never have existed because the past would still be going on for eternity never reaching this point. As you can see, infinite regress in all its varieties (e.g. cycles, multiverses) is inherently contradictory and therefore, false.
Something Can't Come From Nothing
2. Something can't come from nothing (non-existence) either, because that which does not exist can't cause anything. Nothing always leaves nothing from nothing. Energy can be neither created nor destroyed. It can only change forms. In any process in an isolated system, the total energy remains the same. Since that which does not exist has no energy, it cannot produce a singularity for the universe. Many times I have heard atheists say, "The properties of the universe are different from the whole, so the composition doesn't need to abide in the law of cause and effect when it was brought into being." Of course, this is doublespeak because for something to be "brought into being" requires a causation.
A Mind is Needed to Create a Mind
3. Since nature can't always have existed nor start up from nothing, there must exist that which is outside of nature, that is, outside of time and space which always existed. This is whom we call the uncreated Creator. If you want to compare an always existing timeless singularity to the uncreated Creator, simply observe what we know that that which doesn't have a mind, will, emotion, conscience, intuition or self-consciousness can't produce that which does. The lesser can never produce the greater. There has not even been enough interatomic interactions in the history of the universe to be able to do so. If you claim time is needed to bring about this universe from a causeless singularity but the singularity has no element of time then this universe would never have come into being.
The Resurrection Proof Proves Jesus is God
4. Now that we know the uncreated Creator exists, we can compare. A God who is accessible and personal is better than one that is not. Only in Christianity do we find God enters His creation, dies for the sins of the world and proves He is our Creator by resurrecting Himself from the dead which can only occur supernaturally. Since almost all skeptical scholars concede for good reasons the disciples truly believed they saw Jesus alive from the dead in various group settings and there are no naturalistic explanations that can account for the origin of the disciples' beliefs, having exhausted them all, we should submit ourselves to this evidence, because if a person doesn't, he or she will surely go to Hell according to Jesus our Creator.
We didn't come from nothing.
What you fail to grasp is that something has always existed and something will always exist. Long after our universe dies another one will form and long before our universe other universes existed. The universe always was is and will be. No need for a god. Why can't the universe be eternal but a god can?
There was never a beginning and there will never Be an end.
If we are so special why weren't we on the scene until about a million years ago? And what's god gonna do with the universe when were gone?
Thus nature needs a cause outside of itself, outside of time and space, being uncreated. This uncreated Creator is whom we call God.
God says the New City has no need of the sun in eternity future. The first God-conscious man, a person who never ceases to exist, was born 4004 BC. Pre-Adamic men before that ceased to exist when they died as the body from dust (Gen. 2.7).
It is illogical to ask why God did it when He did for it is His prerogative outside of time and space.
You do know stars die and are born every day right? Hell every second.
That's how big the universe is. Infinite.
What is infinite regress? Our universe as we see it didn't look like it does now 22 billion years ago. Lots of the stars back then have since died. Some of them once harbored life. Stars that haven't even been born yet will one day harbor life. The lives lost in the past and the lives born in the future only live once. Just like a trilobite or dinosaur that lived billions of years ago.
And one day all the stars in our universe will die out. What will happen to all that matter? Will it be recycled billions of years in the future?
You're creating an unnecessary argument. Why does my theory mean we would have already happened?