Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It was a nightstick.
And standing outside a polling place would not assist those goons in spotting voter fraud, anyway.
List the law(s) that was/were broken. Just one, if you will...please.
It was a nightstick.
And standing outside a polling place would not assist those goons in spotting voter fraud, anyway.
List the law(s) that was/were broken. Just one, if you will...please.
Repost the post where I said that they had broken a law.
Just one.
Oh, and btw, Happy New(ish) Year.
List the law(s) that was/were broken. Just one, if you will...please.
Repost the post where I said that they had broken a law.
Just one.
Oh, and btw, Happy New(ish) Year.
Happy New Year to you sir.
How can you throw that in and disarm me while I'm trying to verbally dismantle you?
All the best to you and yours in 2012 and beyon my friend.
With that said, that's the point, no laws were broken, hence...a fake outrage. RW poutrage.
You crazy, crazy, crazy RWer you...no laws were broken.Nice try. Points for effort, amigo!
HOWEVER, it must be done. I am compelled to expose your fallacious (piss poor) excuse for "reasoning."
One need not be engaged in criminal behavior for that behavior to be objectionable.
And it might even be that standing in front of a polling place with nightsticks COULD constitute criminal behavior.
For instance, the Voting Rights Act of 1965 states [see Section 11(b)] that "No person Â… shall intimidate, threaten, or coerce Â… any person for voting or attempting to vote."
It seems to me that having a couple of goons armed with one or more nightsticks standing outside of a polling place MIGHT intimidate a voter or two and and the mere presence of nightstick(s) MIGHT constitute a threat.
Ergo, no "faux" to the outrage at all.
Thank me.![]()
The dumb dumb hard RW palookas wanted Eric Holder's head for not prosecuting 2 black guys fore PEACEFULLY standing in their OWN voting districts.
They called a small plastic stick a weapon, while fighting and screaming about their rights to carry ASSAULT RIFLES to Obama rallies.
I mean, you can't make this stuff up!!!
![]()
Why do you have an adultering racist as an avatar?
It was a nightstick.
And standing outside a polling place would not assist those goons in spotting voter fraud, anyway.
Democrats have used radical left wing Blacks for fifty years and the jerks don't even realize that they are being manipulated by the party of segregation. Left wing Black radicals have been taught to ridicule successful Black men and women like Clarence Thomas, and Dr. Condie Rice and they have been filled with such hatred that they can't even think straight.
Democrats have used radical left wing Blacks for fifty years and the jerks don't even realize that they are being manipulated by the party of segregation. Left wing Black radicals have been taught to ridicule successful Black men and women like Clarence Thomas, and Dr. Condie Rice and they have been filled with such hatred that they can't even think straight.
Another 'Blacks are not smart enough to understand what liberals are doing to them' tirade. And conservatives are not racists.
Guess which one tops the list?
The 10 Most Ridiculous Right-Wing Outrages of 2011 | | AlterNet
And guess which one MOST of the hard RW palookas post as some "evidence" of fraud of misconduct on our very own USMB?
RWers really crack me up.
![]()
Guess which one tops the list?
The 10 Most Ridiculous Right-Wing Outrages of 2011 | | AlterNet
And guess which one MOST of the hard RW palookas post as some "evidence" of fraud of misconduct on our very own USMB?
RWers really crack me up.
![]()
Interesting Fast and Furious wasn't on the list!
Second, Solyndra was not a ridiculous outrage, that was a legit outrage and I am SHOCKED anyone could marginalize it!
Third, Black Panther thugs outnumber KKK membership, so should we say race hustlers like you have ridiculous outrages when screaming about the KKK?
What about Obama appointing Larry Summers as Chairman of his economic counsel?
Is this one of the top 10 democrat outrages?
No, but it sure points out another false outrage from the right. Such an appointment doesn't characterize Obama as a MARXIST! or SOCIALIST!! as the right wing has done.
Larry Sommers is hardly a socialist or marxist,
He is arguably one of the most corrupt people in Washington...period.
I am seriously doubting you have any idea why.
You should be completely outraged and mystified why Obama appointed him as his chief economic adviser.
You crazy, crazy, crazy RWer you...no laws were broken.Nice try. Points for effort, amigo!
HOWEVER, it must be done. I am compelled to expose your fallacious (piss poor) excuse for "reasoning."
One need not be engaged in criminal behavior for that behavior to be objectionable.
And it might even be that standing in front of a polling place with nightsticks COULD constitute criminal behavior.
For instance, the Voting Rights Act of 1965 states [see Section 11(b)] that "No person Â… shall intimidate, threaten, or coerce Â… any person for voting or attempting to vote."
It seems to me that having a couple of goons armed with one or more nightsticks standing outside of a polling place MIGHT intimidate a voter or two and and the mere presence of nightstick(s) MIGHT constitute a threat.
Ergo, no "faux" to the outrage at all.
Thank me.![]()
Uddawize...dey wood be arrestid by now.![]()
It was a nightstick.
And standing outside a polling place would not assist those goons in spotting voter fraud, anyway.
It was a walking stick, not a nightstick.
Guess which one tops the list?
The 10 Most Ridiculous Right-Wing Outrages of 2011 | | AlterNet
And guess which one MOST of the hard RW palookas post as some "evidence" of fraud of misconduct on our very own USMB?
RWers really crack me up.
![]()
In what may be the most “meta” conspiracy theory of the year, Fox's Steve Doocey suggested that the only reason the network's endless parade of half-cooked scandals never caught on was the mainstream media's hopeless liberal bias. But when Huffington Post's Sam Stein looked at the media's coverage of Muffin-gate, he found that of 223 news stories that mentioned the “$16 muffins” from September 20-28, only 37 attempted to correct the record.
AlterNet really cracks me up...
Okay ... watch the responses.
The rw's can't counter even one point so they take shots at the source.
Just like, not one rw has answered my challenge to post a list of Repub accomplishments. they can't because they're aren't any. So, instead, they criticize my source.
Cracks ME up!
Outrages? The left has pretty thin skin these days. Two rediculous looking Black guys dressed up to look like domestic terrorists want to tell us about non-existant conspiracies against muslems and whine about Fox. Not surprising.
Well...the incident on the tape occured during the Bush Regime, so I'll let you determine what that means or doesn't mean.That's a silly thing to say.
They WEREN'T arrested by now or at all, but that doesn't mean no law was broken.
Silly silly silly.
All it means is that somebody (or entities) CHOSE not to apply the law in their case.