Seawytch
Information isnt Advocacy
I just posted the timeline of the ruling. This is headed to the SCOTUS.
Again, there are no benefits gays got in addition to benefits straights received. This case was about timing, but bass ackward Texas Republicans want to make it bigger.
Instead, the Texas Supreme Court insisted, the trial court must settle the issue itself—keeping in mind that Obergefell “did not hold that states must provide the same publicly funded benefits to all married persons.”
This is headed to the SCOTUS.
this has already been to the federal supreme court stupid
what do you think the references to Obergefell v. Hodges is all about
--LOL
like i said earlier you dont have a clue as to what happened
as for obergefell there are more cases headed that way
one is there currently
The goal of this case is to challenge Obergefell. It failed before, they exerted pressure and now are getting it to move forward under the premise that states and localities should still be able to deny equal benefits to married gay couples.
It's not going to win. No "reasonable" judge is going to rule that only some married couples are deserving of benefits.
so you say
leftards and their magic crystal ball
It failed before
you really dont know what you are rambling about do ya
The court initially declined to hear Pidgeon. But after being lobbied by many of the state's most influential conservatives, the justices surprised everyone and reinstated the case. That decision brought back memories from 2000, when two Republican justices on the Fourteenth Court of Appeals in Houston had the gall to find that the Texas sodomy statute violated the Texas Constitution, and a campaign was launched against them.
Can Texas conservatives put limits on gay marriage?
The court initially declined to hear Pidgeon. But after being lobbied by many of the state's most influential conservatives, the justices surprised everyone and reinstated the case. That decision brought back memories from 2000, when two Republican justices on the Fourteenth Court of Appeals in Houston had the gall to find that the Texas sodomy statute violated the Texas Constitution, and a campaign was launched against them.
yeah so what
the mayor took it to federal court
and the court rejected it
sending it back to the state
thanks for demonstrating
that you do not know what you are rambling about
The State Supreme Court initially rejected it. Under political pressure they decided to hear it.
But after being lobbied by many of the state's most influential conservatives, the justices surprised everyone and reinstated the case.
Surprised everyone because it has no merit, no "reasonableness". It is not reasonable to deny gay couples the same benefits as straight couples.