Well, if you agree that this was the "right" thing to do
You don't know the difference between the right to do something and it being the right thing to do? Seriously? A Christian doesn't know the difference between those?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well, if you agree that this was the "right" thing to do
Stop lying. Of course there was a valid reason ... to end her persistent vegetative state, of which, there was no return.Now you're flat out lying. The money went into trust for her medical expenses, which were enormous.I know when the settlement was settled andThe only other people who conveniently came up with that testimony only did so years later after he rec'd a 1,5 million dollar settlement.....and it was Michael, his brother and his sister in law. All had motive to lie.
You keep saying that, however M.S. got $300,000 not 1.5 million. The settlement was 2 million, the lawyers got about half. $750,000 was setup to pay medical bills, and M.S. received the remaining $300,000. The schism with the parents started shortly after that after refusing to give the parents a cut.
Can't get a 1.5 million dollar settlement that way though.Like I said, he should have divorced her. If he had wanted to move on, divorcing her and leaving her care to someone else would have been the appropriate thing to do.
The malpractice case was settled long before the 1998 request to allow Terri's body to not be maintained via artificial means.
The bodies continued existence at that point had nothing to do with a case that had already been settled.
>>>>>
700,000 was put in a trust fund for Terri's medical care. He denied medical care and instead used that money to pay the legal fees he accrued trying to kill her.
The man wouldn't even let the nursing home treat a urinary tract infection.
None of your excuses for this man's heartless behavior towards this woman's parents are valid. There is absolutely no reason why he could not divorce her and leave her to her parents' care. No reason at all, except that he didn't want her around anymore. Perhaps that helped to quell some of his guilt for cheating on his wife.
Breathing and heart beating are autonomic functions, and she had no brain waves, you can't change that fact, you can just ignore it, which you keep trying to do.
If she was still breathing without the help of a machine, then she was not "brain dead." She was severely retarded. Brain dead people are hooked up to machines because they're brains aren't making any connections with the rest of the body, such as the heart, lungs, etc.
If I am ever in her state then I hope you people are ignored and they give me a shot and end it. Especially if you are right that she had awareness. Though she obviously didn't.
Look, if she was in pain and suffering, I would agree, but she wasn't suffering until they disconnected her feeding tube. That CAUSED her to suffer.
Please give us some "credible" proof that having her feeding tube disconnected CAUSED her to suffer. Based on my research - that is NOT true!
I already posted a link with eyewitness accounts from her priest, parents and friends. She was in pain when they disconnected her feeding tube. She was allowed to starve for 2 weeks. Ever feel hungry before?
You're ******* wrong. She was not a "flat liner." She could breath on her own, and her heart was still beating.
Brain Dead is Dead Serendip Studio
Breathing and heart beating are autonomic functions, and she had no brain waves, you can't change that fact, you can just ignore it, which you keep trying to do.
If she was still breathing without the help of a machine, then she was not "brain dead." She was severely retarded. Brain dead people are hooked up to machines because they're brains aren't making any connections with the rest of the body, such as the heart, lungs, etc.
If I am ever in her state then I hope you people are ignored and they give me a shot and end it. Especially if you are right that she had awareness. Though she obviously didn't.
Look, if she was in pain and suffering, I would agree, but she wasn't suffering until they disconnected her feeding tube. That CAUSED her to suffer.
Please give us some "credible" proof that having her feeding tube disconnected CAUSED her to suffer. Based on my research - that is NOT true!
Stop lying. Of course there was a valid reason ... to end her persistent vegetative state, of which, there was no return.Now you're flat out lying. The money went into trust for her medical expenses, which were enormous.I know when the settlement was settled andThe only other people who conveniently came up with that testimony only did so years later after he rec'd a 1,5 million dollar settlement.....and it was Michael, his brother and his sister in law. All had motive to lie.
You keep saying that, however M.S. got $300,000 not 1.5 million. The settlement was 2 million, the lawyers got about half. $750,000 was setup to pay medical bills, and M.S. received the remaining $300,000. The schism with the parents started shortly after that after refusing to give the parents a cut.
Can't get a 1.5 million dollar settlement that way though.
The malpractice case was settled long before the 1998 request to allow Terri's body to not be maintained via artificial means.
The bodies continued existence at that point had nothing to do with a case that had already been settled.
>>>>>
700,000 was put in a trust fund for Terri's medical care. He denied medical care and instead used that money to pay the legal fees he accrued trying to kill her.
The man wouldn't even let the nursing home treat a urinary tract infection.
None of your excuses for this man's heartless behavior towards this woman's parents are valid. There is absolutely no reason why he could not divorce her and leave her to her parents' care. No reason at all, except that he didn't want her around anymore. Perhaps that helped to quell some of his guilt for cheating on his wife.
If she was still breathing without the help of a machine, then she was not "brain dead." She was severely retarded. Brain dead people are hooked up to machines because they're brains aren't making any connections with the rest of the body, such as the heart, lungs, etc.
If I am ever in her state then I hope you people are ignored and they give me a shot and end it. Especially if you are right that she had awareness. Though she obviously didn't.
Look, if she was in pain and suffering, I would agree, but she wasn't suffering until they disconnected her feeding tube. That CAUSED her to suffer.
Please give us some "credible" proof that having her feeding tube disconnected CAUSED her to suffer. Based on my research - that is NOT true!
I already posted a link with eyewitness accounts from her priest, parents and friends. She was in pain when they disconnected her feeding tube. She was allowed to starve for 2 weeks. Ever feel hungry before?
Yes, I've felt "hungry" before - but my brain wasn't soup.
Like others have said, you wouldn't even treat your DOG this way.
Breathing and heart beating are autonomic functions, and she had no brain waves, you can't change that fact, you can just ignore it, which you keep trying to do.
If she was still breathing without the help of a machine, then she was not "brain dead." She was severely retarded. Brain dead people are hooked up to machines because they're brains aren't making any connections with the rest of the body, such as the heart, lungs, etc.
If I am ever in her state then I hope you people are ignored and they give me a shot and end it. Especially if you are right that she had awareness. Though she obviously didn't.
Look, if she was in pain and suffering, I would agree, but she wasn't suffering until they disconnected her feeding tube. That CAUSED her to suffer.
Please give us some "credible" proof that having her feeding tube disconnected CAUSED her to suffer. Based on my research - that is NOT true!
Not only are the ones who are complaining she suffered, they are the ones who prevent her from being given a shot so she doesn't suffer. And in fact, they prevent doctors from giving people with painful illnesses facing imminent death from getting a shot to end it in fact knowingly causing people to suffer.
If I am ever in her state then I hope you people are ignored and they give me a shot and end it. Especially if you are right that she had awareness. Though she obviously didn't.
Look, if she was in pain and suffering, I would agree, but she wasn't suffering until they disconnected her feeding tube. That CAUSED her to suffer.
Please give us some "credible" proof that having her feeding tube disconnected CAUSED her to suffer. Based on my research - that is NOT true!
I already posted a link with eyewitness accounts from her priest, parents and friends. She was in pain when they disconnected her feeding tube. She was allowed to starve for 2 weeks. Ever feel hungry before?
Yes, I've felt "hungry" before - but my brain wasn't soup.
Retarded people feel pain, moron.
If she was still breathing without the help of a machine, then she was not "brain dead." She was severely retarded. Brain dead people are hooked up to machines because they're brains aren't making any connections with the rest of the body, such as the heart, lungs, etc.
If I am ever in her state then I hope you people are ignored and they give me a shot and end it. Especially if you are right that she had awareness. Though she obviously didn't.
Look, if she was in pain and suffering, I would agree, but she wasn't suffering until they disconnected her feeding tube. That CAUSED her to suffer.
Please give us some "credible" proof that having her feeding tube disconnected CAUSED her to suffer. Based on my research - that is NOT true!
Not only are the ones who are complaining she suffered, they are the ones who prevent her from being given a shot so she doesn't suffer. And in fact, they prevent doctors from giving people with painful illnesses facing imminent death from getting a shot to end it in fact knowingly causing people to suffer.
That is irrelevant to this case because, as of right now, it is not legal to do such a thing. Therefore, everyone knew she would suffer.
Kenneth Goodman, director of bioethics at the University of Miami School of Medicine and a co-director of the Florida Bioethics Network said that the "removal of feeding tubes is a common practice." He said that there is no pain involved in dying of dehydration and/or starvation.: "Soon after nourishment is denied to the brain, it begins producing chemicals that act as a natural anesthetic. She is not going to feel a thing. The artificial pain medication that Schiavo will receive is to make sure that if there is [pain], it is adequately handled."
More: Euthanasia and Terri Schiavo: What death by dehydration involves
Terri did not feel pain.
Kenneth Goodman, director of bioethics at the University of Miami School of Medicine and a co-director of the Florida Bioethics Network said that the "removal of feeding tubes is a common practice." He said that there is no pain involved in dying of dehydration and/or starvation.: "Soon after nourishment is denied to the brain, it begins producing chemicals that act as a natural anesthetic. She is not going to feel a thing. The artificial pain medication that Schiavo will receive is to make sure that if there is [pain], it is adequately handled."
More: Euthanasia and Terri Schiavo: What death by dehydration involves
Terri did not feel pain.
His wife was dead for all intent and purposes. Her family had even accepted that and wanted him to get on with his life.Terri's own family encouraged him to start dating and to move on with his life.The only reason why I think the judge would have sided with the husband is because he was the husband. He thought the same as a lot of you seem to think, that the parents have no say in their daughter's life because she was married. Well, I don't believe that. They will always be her parents, regardless of whether or not she is married, and I would trust their unconditional love over a man who was cheating on her.
1) He wasn't cheating on her.
2) Other people she knew confirmed that she wouldn't want to be kept alive under such circumstances.
3) Such decisions are given to spouses for a reason.
So WHAT? Is he a little baby incapable of keeping his own vows. Okay, I'm going to tell you to go cheat on your wife now. It's okay.![]()
Kenneth Goodman, director of bioethics at the University of Miami School of Medicine and a co-director of the Florida Bioethics Network said that the "removal of feeding tubes is a common practice." He said that there is no pain involved in dying of dehydration and/or starvation.: "Soon after nourishment is denied to the brain, it begins producing chemicals that act as a natural anesthetic. She is not going to feel a thing. The artificial pain medication that Schiavo will receive is to make sure that if there is [pain], it is adequately handled."
More: Euthanasia and Terri Schiavo: What death by dehydration involves
Terri did not feel pain.
That's not what the eyewitnesses saw. They saw her gasping and panting and making pain faces.
Kenneth Goodman, director of bioethics at the University of Miami School of Medicine and a co-director of the Florida Bioethics Network said that the "removal of feeding tubes is a common practice." He said that there is no pain involved in dying of dehydration and/or starvation.: "Soon after nourishment is denied to the brain, it begins producing chemicals that act as a natural anesthetic. She is not going to feel a thing. The artificial pain medication that Schiavo will receive is to make sure that if there is [pain], it is adequately handled."
More: Euthanasia and Terri Schiavo: What death by dehydration involves
Terri did not feel pain.
Kenneth Goodman, director of bioethics at the University of Miami School of Medicine and a co-director of the Florida Bioethics Network said that the "removal of feeding tubes is a common practice." He said that there is no pain involved in dying of dehydration and/or starvation.: "Soon after nourishment is denied to the brain, it begins producing chemicals that act as a natural anesthetic. She is not going to feel a thing. The artificial pain medication that Schiavo will receive is to make sure that if there is [pain], it is adequately handled."
More: Euthanasia and Terri Schiavo: What death by dehydration involves
Terri did not feel pain.
That's not what the eyewitnesses saw. They saw her gasping and panting and making pain faces.
Who were those supposed "eyewitnesses"? Give us some "credible" proof of your claim.
Kenneth Goodman, director of bioethics at the University of Miami School of Medicine and a co-director of the Florida Bioethics Network said that the "removal of feeding tubes is a common practice." He said that there is no pain involved in dying of dehydration and/or starvation.: "Soon after nourishment is denied to the brain, it begins producing chemicals that act as a natural anesthetic. She is not going to feel a thing. The artificial pain medication that Schiavo will receive is to make sure that if there is [pain], it is adequately handled."
More: Euthanasia and Terri Schiavo: What death by dehydration involves
Terri did not feel pain.
That's not what the eyewitnesses saw. They saw her gasping and panting and making pain faces.
Who were those supposed "eyewitnesses"? Give us some "credible" proof of your claim.
I posted a link already. I can't help it if you aren't paying attention.
Ms. Schiavo showed signs of feeling pain, showed signs of recognition when her parents came to see her, smiled and made sounds in an attempt to communicate, had facial expressions that were in response to stimuli. That is not a brain dead person. Severely retarded and will never be the same person that she once was? Yes. However, none of you can say that she didn't or couldn't derive some kind of pleasure from life.
There would have been NO harm done to let her parents care for her until she died naturally, as she was NOT in pain when she had her feeding tube connected.
So, I guess we should just start putting retarded people and old people who suffer from dementia to death now, according to the heartless liberals who care more about animals than people.