Parents in red-leaning suburbs outside NYC green-lighting armed security at public schools

Do you support armed guards in schools?

  • Yes

    Votes: 14 87.5%
  • No

    Votes: 2 12.5%
  • Undecided

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    16
There were armed guards at Columbine.
There were armed guards at Parkland High School.
There were armed guards at Virginia Tech.
There were armed guards at Fort Hood and the Washington Naval Yard.

Armed guards don't stop mass shooters, usually because a Mass Shooter does his business long before an armed guard can react.

Here's how you stop mass shooters. You have common sense gun laws, and don't give out military-grade weapons to crazy people. The UK, Canada, France, Germany, Japan, and Italy have all figured this out, which is why they RARELY have mass shootings.
Spare the Rod and the Child Thinks He's God

All Netrix debates miss the point. The problem is how we coddle weirdos instead of driving them to hate themselves so that they will either change their ways or withdraw from society. The wimpy liberal condemnation of bullying refuses to recognize its socially useful effects.
 
There were armed guards at Columbine.
There were armed guards at Parkland High School.
There were armed guards at Virginia Tech.
There were armed guards at Fort Hood and the Washington Naval Yard.

Armed guards don't stop mass shooters, usually because a Mass Shooter does his business long before an armed guard can react.

Here's how you stop mass shooters. You have common sense gun laws, and don't give out military-grade weapons to crazy people. The UK, Canada, France, Germany, Japan, and Italy have all figured this out, which is why they RARELY have mass shootings.
The expense of employing armed guards in schools is probably not worth it unless the "armed guards" have some other function. Columbine had no armed guards and neither did Va. Tech.. Parkland Cops apparently preferred to wait until the shooter expended his ammo before approaching him. Maybe the concept of "armed guards" makes parents feel better but it's no guarantee against a maniac killer.
 
The expense of employing armed guards in schools is probably not worth it unless the "armed guards" have some other function. Columbine had no armed guards and neither did Va. Tech.. Parkland Cops apparently preferred to wait until the shooter expended his ammo before approaching him. Maybe the concept of "armed guards" makes parents feel better but it's no guarantee against a maniac killer.
Actually, Columbine did have an armed guard and he exchanged fire with Harris, (one of the two shooters.)

The parkland cop really had no idea what was going on, because he was outside the building and he wasn't even sure which floor the shots were being fired on.
 
You are kind of proving my point.

Let me help you out. Let's say you assign one armed guard to every school. That's one guard for maybe 1000 students. A campus that might sprawl over several buildings.

The Mass shooter has planned his action for months. He's studied the layout of the school. He knows exactly where to inflict maximum damage.

Take the Columbine shooters. They had an elaborate plan and the only reason they didn't kill a lot more people was because their improvised explosive devices failed to work properly.



The second officer was Deputy Paul Smoker, a motorcycle patrolman who was near the school writing a speeding ticket. When he heard a dispatch of a woman injured at the high school, he responded. He, too, fired at Harris but didn't stop him.
LaPierre said having armed security on the scene is necessary so someone is there to shoot back. "The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun," he said. "Would you rather have your 911 call bring a good guy with a gun from a mile away -- or a minute away?"
But in chaotic situations, it's often impossible to identify the "bad guy," as Smoker said in his account of Columbine: "There was an unknown inside a school. We didn't know who the 'bad guy' was but we soon realized the sophistication of their weapons. These were big bombs. Big guns. We didn’t have a clue who 'they' were."
I don't need your help.

I am more for this with required training:

After calls for gun safety, Tennessee votes to arm teachers​



An analysis of state laws by Newsweek shows that more than 30 states allow teachers to carry guns under certain conditions. The majority of these states require at least the permission of a school authority, and in some states, the teacher must undergo additional training. New Hampshire is the only state with no restrictions on adults carrying guns on school grounds; only students are prohibited.


Glad I could help you out.
 
Actually, Columbine did have an armed guard and he exchanged fire with Harris, (one of the two shooters.)

The parkland cop really had no idea what was going on, because he was outside the building and he wasn't even sure which floor the shots were being fired on.

Columbine changed the tactics of the police, because they were still working under hostage negotiation techniques….the parkland cop violated his training and stayed outside….

Schools with some armed staff are not targeted for mass public shootings.
 
You are kind of proving my point.

Let me help you out. Let's say you assign one armed guard to every school. That's one guard for maybe 1000 students. A campus that might sprawl over several buildings.

The Mass shooter has planned his action for months. He's studied the layout of the school. He knows exactly where to inflict maximum damage.

Take the Columbine shooters. They had an elaborate plan and the only reason they didn't kill a lot more people was because their improvised explosive devices failed to work properly.



The second officer was Deputy Paul Smoker, a motorcycle patrolman who was near the school writing a speeding ticket. When he heard a dispatch of a woman injured at the high school, he responded. He, too, fired at Harris but didn't stop him.
LaPierre said having armed security on the scene is necessary so someone is there to shoot back. "The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun," he said. "Would you rather have your 911 call bring a good guy with a gun from a mile away -- or a minute away?"
But in chaotic situations, it's often impossible to identify the "bad guy," as Smoker said in his account of Columbine: "There was an unknown inside a school. We didn't know who the 'bad guy' was but we soon realized the sophistication of their weapons. These were big bombs. Big guns. We didn’t have a clue who 'they' were."

Let me help you…..a school with an unknown number and location off armed staff, trained to protect students is not a target for mass public shooters….we know this from actual mass public shooters who were captured or stated so in their journals…

just like the black racist mass shooter who was just captured before his attack, and the democrat party, left wing transgender killer in Tennessee who targeted the school because she knew it was gun free….dittos the rest of the mass public shooters.
 
Actually, Columbine did have an armed guard and he exchanged fire with Harris, (one of the two shooters.)

The parkland cop really had no idea what was going on, because he was outside the building and he wasn't even sure which floor the shots were being fired on.

Aand the current training at the time was specific to hostage situations and not killing events….that is why at Columbine the police did not enter the building….

Current training mandates that first officer or officers on the scene immediately enter the building and engage the attacker….

The benefit of having armed staff is mass public shooters do not target armed,locations……and should that attack happen, there is armed staff on scene, not 5 minutes away
 
What on earth is he doing there? In a school, for gawds' sakes.

I don't know of any other country that does that.

Except in Europe where every Jewish school has armed security…..you mean except for those schools…right?
 
Australia and the UK didn't have massive gun ownership to start with.

Gun ownership doesn't prevent dictatorship. There was massive gun ownership before Hitler in Germany, and even afterwards. Not a one of them resisted when Hitler came to power. Nobody ran out with his gun that he had been squirreling away since WWI and said, "You can't take Goldstein, he's my friend!!!!"

Guns were banned and confiscated in Germany starting in the 1920s…..so when the blm/antifa………I mean the socialist brown shirts….would target the political enemies of the socialists for violence and murder, the population was helpless…..and this allowed the socialists to take power……..
 
Not at all. Even I know that mass gun confiscation isn't practical.

What is practical -

Thorough background checks for new gun purchases.
Red Flag laws to take guns away from people who are truly dangerous.

Hoping that assigning an underperforming cop as a school resource officer, well, we saw how well that worked at Parkland. By the time that Cop did anything, the shooter was done with his business and chilling at the Starbucks across the street.

We have background checks…..and the FBI and local police keep forgetting to put felons on the list……..

We don’t need Red Flag legal warfare against normal gun owners ….we can already arrest or commit dangerous people….the problem is the democrats keep releasing them from jail and prison.
 
There were armed guards at Columbine.
There were armed guards at Parkland High School.
There were armed guards at Virginia Tech.
There were armed guards at Fort Hood and the Washington Naval Yard.

Armed guards don't stop mass shooters, usually because a Mass Shooter does his business long before an armed guard can react.

Here's how you stop mass shooters. You have common sense gun laws, and don't give out military-grade weapons to crazy people. The UK, Canada, France, Germany, Japan, and Italy have all figured this out, which is why they RARELY have mass shootings.

Fort Hood? The only armed people were the fort police……minutes away from the gun free zones the shooters attacked…..

Virginia Tech, same thing…..campus police covering a huge campus and minutes away from getting to the attack after they know where it is specifically happening…..

Armed law abiding citizens with legal guns prevent these attacks from happening in the first place…….and if an idiot does attack, they can be stopped immediately, not 5-10 minutes if the police can get there…
 
You are kind of proving my point.

Let me help you out. Let's say you assign one armed guard to every school. That's one guard for maybe 1000 students. A campus that might sprawl over several buildings.

The Mass shooter has planned his action for months. He's studied the layout of the school. He knows exactly where to inflict maximum damage.

Take the Columbine shooters. They had an elaborate plan and the only reason they didn't kill a lot more people was because their improvised explosive devices failed to work properly.



The second officer was Deputy Paul Smoker, a motorcycle patrolman who was near the school writing a speeding ticket. When he heard a dispatch of a woman injured at the high school, he responded. He, too, fired at Harris but didn't stop him.
LaPierre said having armed security on the scene is necessary so someone is there to shoot back. "The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun," he said. "Would you rather have your 911 call bring a good guy with a gun from a mile away -- or a minute away?"
But in chaotic situations, it's often impossible to identify the "bad guy," as Smoker said in his account of Columbine: "There was an unknown inside a school. We didn't know who the 'bad guy' was but we soon realized the sophistication of their weapons. These were big bombs. Big guns. We didn’t have a clue who 'they' were."

Yep….one armed guard over 17 buildings at Parkland…….

That is why you have an unknown number and location of trained and armed staff…so no one knows where they are or who they are, which makes planning a shooting impossible…so shooters don’t attack….

We know from their writings and statements that shooters target gun free zones….he most recent black racist who planned on murdering a bunch of white people stated he picked a gun free zone location…..as did the democrat party supporting transgender shooter in Tennessee.
 
I don't need your help.

I am more for this with required training:

After calls for gun safety, Tennessee votes to arm teachers​



An analysis of state laws by Newsweek shows that more than 30 states allow teachers to carry guns under certain conditions. The majority of these states require at least the permission of a school authority, and in some states, the teacher must undergo additional training. New Hampshire is the only state with no restrictions on adults carrying guns on school grounds; only students are prohibited.


Glad I could help you out.
I don't think I want an underpaid teacher using his gun to shoot a disturbed student who didn't take his Ritalin that day.

It's bad enough we have cops doing that sort of thing.
 
I don't think I want an underpaid teacher using his gun to shoot a disturbed student who didn't take his Ritalin that day.

It's bad enough we have cops doing that sort of thing.
Maybe you should look into the required training and qualifications. Then get back to me.

You saw the part where 30 states have laws about this.
 
Maybe you should look into the required training and qualifications. Then get back to me.

You saw the part where 30 states have laws about this.
Cops have training and qualifications, and we still have incidents where they end up shooting innocent unarmed people.

Not sure how you can make a teacher more qualified than that.
 

Forum List

Back
Top