Ravi
Diamond Member
I've no idea. I was simply pointing out that that blurb did not make it so that Cruz was a citizen of the US.The particular law cited says "a person born in an outlying possession of the United States," did you miss that?Canada isn't an outlying possession of the US.Ok, so I know this has been covered a number of times already, however I haven't seen the following link posted which to me seems to spell it out..
Are you the foreign-born child of a parent who becomes a U.S. citizen?
This is how the US government defines citizens from birth vs citizens based on application after birth. To me, this is essentially "natural born citizen" vs "allowed citizen via application after birth". This is specific to americans born outside of the US which applies in Cruz's case, as opposed to obvious natural born citizens born within the United States.
From this page, if his parents were _not_ married he's good to go, but if his parents _were_ married when he was born then he probably wouldn't qualify..
Thoughts?
Cruz was born a citizen
ilink | USCIS
(e) a person born in an outlying possession of the United States of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year at any time prior to the birth of such person;
What does that have to do with anything?
HIs mother was American born, he's American
NO.
but, what was the law prior to that?
Cruz is as much a citizen as you, and anyone else on this board.
(BTW, I hope Cruz, and Trump, lose)