Derideo_Te
Je Suis Charlie
- Mar 2, 2013
- 20,461
- 7,961
- 360
I was referring to post #347 where mr. keys physically deleted the body of my post and only quoted the first three words.Proof? I see three words of my post. If it wasn't edited were is the rest of it?More assertion without proof.The torture defenders have decided a couple of Bush appointed lawyers had the authority to change the definition of torture set by decades of precedent established by decades of courts and military tribunals. The public officials defending the activity are the ones who implemented and executed it or have interest in protecting those officials. Nobody in the world believes that the US did not torture captives.What the Bush Administration knew and what they told Congress (in effect what they told the American people) did not match up with all those protocols, which were merely window dressing for the torturous acts.
Torture, as I have said now for the fourth time, is using physical pain as a means of interrogation. We used the same method Japanese war criminals used against American POWs during World War II. We were able to recognize torture in 1945. Why can't you recognize it in 2014?
Your lame response of editing my post and leaving out the links is duly noted. Kind of weaselly and cowardly, don't you think?ROFLMNAO! I do SO adore the sweeter ironies.
Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.
Try clicking on the words "click to expand"!
There is a quote feature than allows you to highlight any words you like and only reply to those. How do you know he didn't use that instead?