Sydney Powell's "Excuse" puts the BIG LIE of election fraud to rest...

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Numerous audits by corrupted officials. They mean 0. There has not been the transparency voters have a right to.

Right. They’re corrupt officials because they didn’t give you what you wanted.

Doesn’t matter if they’re true or not, unless they tell you what you want to hear, they’re corrupt.

Pot said to the kettle...

 

[colfax_m]

Either you're prepared to show how all the election fraud evidence is wrong and has been debunked and disproven (as you keep claiming over and over) or NOT.

A big problem is most (dare say almost all) of the “evidence” doesn’t actually prove anything. It just looks suspicious. Now, without any further investigation, it proves nothing.

For example, one allegation is that post office boxes were being used as addresses for ballots in Georgia. Is that illegal? No. Is it evidence of fraud? Not really. Could it be fraud? Sure, technically possible. Unless one of us goes and calls the people on such a list, it’s no evidence or anything one way or the other.

Just an example.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Numerous audits by corrupted officials. They mean 0. There has not been the transparency voters have a right to.

Right. They’re corrupt officials because they didn’t give you what you wanted.

Doesn’t matter if they’re true or not, unless they tell you what you want to hear, they’re corrupt.

Pot said to the kettle...

 

[Lastamender]

Either you're prepared to show how all the election fraud evidence is wrong and has been debunked and disproven (as you keep claiming over and over) or NOT.

A big problem is most (dare say almost all) of the “evidence” doesn’t actually prove anything. It just looks suspicious. Now, without any further investigation, it proves nothing.

For example, one allegation is that post office boxes were being used as addresses for ballots in Georgia. Is that illegal? No. Is it evidence of fraud? Not really. Could it be fraud? Sure, technically possible. Unless one of us goes and calls the people on such a list, it’s no evidence or anything one way or the other.

Just an example.

one allegation is that post office boxes were being used as addresses for ballots in Georgia. Is that illegal?

Seriously?
You know that little about the law? Do you think Stacy Abrahms could fit into one of those boxes?

 

[The Banker]

LIAR

View attachment 472225

The evidence was 100% to multiple courts. YOU IGNORE THIS FACT. HERE ARE SOME OF THE JUDGES WHO SAW THIS EVIDENCE RESPONSE:

"The court finds that there is no credible or reliable evidence that the 2020 General Election in Nevada was affected by fraud.”

The Trump campaign “did not prove under any standard of proof that illegal votes were cast and counted, or legal votes were not counted at all, due to voter fraud, nor...in an amount sufficient to raise reasonable doubt as to the outcome of the election,”

Chief Justice Robert Brutinel agreed, saying Ward's challenge had failed to "present any evidence of 'misconduct,' 'illegal votes' or that the Biden Electors 'did not in fact receive the highest number of votes for office,'" he wrote — "let alone establish any degree of fraud or a sufficient error rate that would undermine the certainty of the election results."

ANYBODY THAT TRIES TO CLAIM THE EVIDENCE WAS NEVER PRESENTED IS A TOTAL LIAR.

What a joke. A bunch of drivel pasted here unsupported by even a link to the source! Admit it fool, you got nothing. The election was a fraud and Biden is an illegal usurper in the WH who should be locked up for impersonating a president.

Courts Repeatedly Ignored Merits Of Trump’s Election Claims

The losing side needed to know that a fair shake was given, and that justice prevailed, even if it wasn't the outcome they wanted. That did not happen.

thefederalist.com

Trump's lawyers, including Giuliani, presented all the fake evidence in court, in front of Trump appointed judges, in different states. Every judge that saw the fake evidence rejected it:

"The court finds that there is no credible or reliable evidence that the 2020 General Election in Nevada was affected by fraud.”

The Trump campaign “did not prove under any standard of proof that illegal votes were cast and counted, or legal votes were not counted at all, due to voter fraud, nor...in an amount sufficient to raise reasonable doubt as to the outcome of the election,”

Chief Justice Robert Brutinel agreed, saying Ward's challenge had failed to "present any evidence of 'misconduct,' 'illegal votes' or that the Biden Electors 'did not in fact receive the highest number of votes for office,'" he wrote — "let alone establish any degree of fraud or a sufficient error rate that would undermine the certainty of the election results."

IN THE WRODS OF SYDNEY POWELL:
"no reasonable person would conclude that the statements were truly statements of fact"

A look at what several state supreme courts said about rejecting attempts to overturn Biden's election win

Supreme Courts in several states have rejected efforts by the Trump campaign. Here is a look at what some of those courts had to say.

www.usatoday.com

Trump Campaign Has ‘No Credible Or Reliable Evidence’ Proving Voter Fraud, Nevada Court Rules

The court dismissed the campaign’s lawsuit trying to overturn the election results.

www.forbes.com

 

[Lastamender]

LIAR

View attachment 472225

The evidence was 100% to multiple courts. YOU IGNORE THIS FACT. HERE ARE SOME OF THE JUDGES WHO SAW THIS EVIDENCE RESPONSE:

"The court finds that there is no credible or reliable evidence that the 2020 General Election in Nevada was affected by fraud.”

The Trump campaign “did not prove under any standard of proof that illegal votes were cast and counted, or legal votes were not counted at all, due to voter fraud, nor...in an amount sufficient to raise reasonable doubt as to the outcome of the election,”

Chief Justice Robert Brutinel agreed, saying Ward's challenge had failed to "present any evidence of 'misconduct,' 'illegal votes' or that the Biden Electors 'did not in fact receive the highest number of votes for office,'" he wrote — "let alone establish any degree of fraud or a sufficient error rate that would undermine the certainty of the election results."

ANYBODY THAT TRIES TO CLAIM THE EVIDENCE WAS NEVER PRESENTED IS A TOTAL LIAR.

What a joke. A bunch of drivel pasted here unsupported by even a link to the source! Admit it fool, you got nothing. The election was a fraud and Biden is an illegal usurper in the WH who should be locked up for impersonating a president.

Courts Repeatedly Ignored Merits Of Trump’s Election Claims

The losing side needed to know that a fair shake was given, and that justice prevailed, even if it wasn't the outcome they wanted. That did not happen.

thefederalist.com

Trump's lawyers, including Giuliani, presented all the fake evidence in court, in front of Trump appointed judges, in different states. Every judge that saw the fake evidence rejected it:

"The court finds that there is no credible or reliable evidence that the 2020 General Election in Nevada was affected by fraud.”

The Trump campaign “did not prove under any standard of proof that illegal votes were cast and counted, or legal votes were not counted at all, due to voter fraud, nor...in an amount sufficient to raise reasonable doubt as to the outcome of the election,”

Chief Justice Robert Brutinel agreed, saying Ward's challenge had failed to "present any evidence of 'misconduct,' 'illegal votes' or that the Biden Electors 'did not in fact receive the highest number of votes for office,'" he wrote — "let alone establish any degree of fraud or a sufficient error rate that would undermine the certainty of the election results."

A look at what several state supreme courts said about rejecting attempts to overturn Biden's election win

Supreme Courts in several states have rejected efforts by the Trump campaign. Here is a look at what some of those courts had to say.

www.usatoday.com

Trump Campaign Has ‘No Credible Or Reliable Evidence’ Proving Voter Fraud, Nevada Court Rules

The court dismissed the campaign’s lawsuit trying to overturn the election results.

www.forbes.com

They presented no evidence in court. They never got an evidentiary hearing. They got a judge's opinion. Dumbass liar.

 

[The Banker]

LIAR

View attachment 472225

The evidence was 100% to multiple courts. YOU IGNORE THIS FACT. HERE ARE SOME OF THE JUDGES WHO SAW THIS EVIDENCE RESPONSE:

"The court finds that there is no credible or reliable evidence that the 2020 General Election in Nevada was affected by fraud.”

The Trump campaign “did not prove under any standard of proof that illegal votes were cast and counted, or legal votes were not counted at all, due to voter fraud, nor...in an amount sufficient to raise reasonable doubt as to the outcome of the election,”

Chief Justice Robert Brutinel agreed, saying Ward's challenge had failed to "present any evidence of 'misconduct,' 'illegal votes' or that the Biden Electors 'did not in fact receive the highest number of votes for office,'" he wrote — "let alone establish any degree of fraud or a sufficient error rate that would undermine the certainty of the election results."

ANYBODY THAT TRIES TO CLAIM THE EVIDENCE WAS NEVER PRESENTED IS A TOTAL LIAR.

What a joke. A bunch of drivel pasted here unsupported by even a link to the source! Admit it fool, you got nothing. The election was a fraud and Biden is an illegal usurper in the WH who should be locked up for impersonating a president.

Courts Repeatedly Ignored Merits Of Trump’s Election Claims

The losing side needed to know that a fair shake was given, and that justice prevailed, even if it wasn't the outcome they wanted. That did not happen.

thefederalist.com

Trump's lawyers, including Giuliani, presented all the fake evidence in court, in front of Trump appointed judges, in different states. Every judge that saw the fake evidence rejected it:

"The court finds that there is no credible or reliable evidence that the 2020 General Election in Nevada was affected by fraud.”

The Trump campaign “did not prove under any standard of proof that illegal votes were cast and counted, or legal votes were not counted at all, due to voter fraud, nor...in an amount sufficient to raise reasonable doubt as to the outcome of the election,”

Chief Justice Robert Brutinel agreed, saying Ward's challenge had failed to "present any evidence of 'misconduct,' 'illegal votes' or that the Biden Electors 'did not in fact receive the highest number of votes for office,'" he wrote — "let alone establish any degree of fraud or a sufficient error rate that would undermine the certainty of the election results."

A look at what several state supreme courts said about rejecting attempts to overturn Biden's election win

Supreme Courts in several states have rejected efforts by the Trump campaign. Here is a look at what some of those courts had to say.

www.usatoday.com

Trump Campaign Has ‘No Credible Or Reliable Evidence’ Proving Voter Fraud, Nevada Court Rules

The court dismissed the campaign’s lawsuit trying to overturn the election results.

www.forbes.com

They presented no evidence in court. They never got an evidentiary hearing. They got a judge's opinion. Dumbass liar.

Nope they presented evidence and it was rejected, because it was lies. Even by Trump appointed judges.

You are just a little fuckin bitch who can't admit Trump lost. At least lose with dignity. The GOP has no dignity.

 

[toobfreak]

Trump's lawyers, including Giuliani, presented blah blah blah

Not asking the lawyers. Not about the courts. THis is about the EVIDENCE you keep saying has all been debunked yet can never produce a shred of proof that it has.

 

[Lastamender]

LIAR

View attachment 472225

The evidence was 100% to multiple courts. YOU IGNORE THIS FACT. HERE ARE SOME OF THE JUDGES WHO SAW THIS EVIDENCE RESPONSE:

"The court finds that there is no credible or reliable evidence that the 2020 General Election in Nevada was affected by fraud.”

The Trump campaign “did not prove under any standard of proof that illegal votes were cast and counted, or legal votes were not counted at all, due to voter fraud, nor...in an amount sufficient to raise reasonable doubt as to the outcome of the election,”

Chief Justice Robert Brutinel agreed, saying Ward's challenge had failed to "present any evidence of 'misconduct,' 'illegal votes' or that the Biden Electors 'did not in fact receive the highest number of votes for office,'" he wrote — "let alone establish any degree of fraud or a sufficient error rate that would undermine the certainty of the election results."

ANYBODY THAT TRIES TO CLAIM THE EVIDENCE WAS NEVER PRESENTED IS A TOTAL LIAR.

What a joke. A bunch of drivel pasted here unsupported by even a link to the source! Admit it fool, you got nothing. The election was a fraud and Biden is an illegal usurper in the WH who should be locked up for impersonating a president.

Courts Repeatedly Ignored Merits Of Trump’s Election Claims

The losing side needed to know that a fair shake was given, and that justice prevailed, even if it wasn't the outcome they wanted. That did not happen.

thefederalist.com

Trump's lawyers, including Giuliani, presented all the fake evidence in court, in front of Trump appointed judges, in different states. Every judge that saw the fake evidence rejected it:

"The court finds that there is no credible or reliable evidence that the 2020 General Election in Nevada was affected by fraud.”

The Trump campaign “did not prove under any standard of proof that illegal votes were cast and counted, or legal votes were not counted at all, due to voter fraud, nor...in an amount sufficient to raise reasonable doubt as to the outcome of the election,”

Chief Justice Robert Brutinel agreed, saying Ward's challenge had failed to "present any evidence of 'misconduct,' 'illegal votes' or that the Biden Electors 'did not in fact receive the highest number of votes for office,'" he wrote — "let alone establish any degree of fraud or a sufficient error rate that would undermine the certainty of the election results."

A look at what several state supreme courts said about rejecting attempts to overturn Biden's election win

Supreme Courts in several states have rejected efforts by the Trump campaign. Here is a look at what some of those courts had to say.

www.usatoday.com

Trump Campaign Has ‘No Credible Or Reliable Evidence’ Proving Voter Fraud, Nevada Court Rules

The court dismissed the campaign’s lawsuit trying to overturn the election results.

www.forbes.com

They presented no evidence in court. They never got an evidentiary hearing. They got a judge's opinion. Dumbass liar.

Nope they presented evidence and it was rejected, because it was lies. Even by Trump appointed judges.

You are just a little fuckin bitch who can't admit Trump lost. At least lose with dignity. The GOP has no dignity.

Trump did not lose. Your post is nothing but you showing your guilt. Why do you keep insisting there was no fraud? A child could see there was massive fraud and a massive conspiracy to cover that fraud up.

Admit it the election was stolen and you have no problem with a corrupt illegitimate administration. On you!

 

[colfax_m]

Seriously?
You know that little about the law? Do you think Stacy Abrahms could fit into one of those boxes?

Go on. Show me the law that you think i need to know more about.

 

[forkup]

Section 1. Equal protection under the law.

It’s not. As long as everyone has to follow the same rules in a state, there is no violation.

The rules must be legislated.

There’s always details that are left to the election boards and administration to sort out. No legislature makes a law for everything.

Obviously.

The constitution stipulates that any election rules changes must go through the state legislature.
PA didn’t do this. Left wing judges and non-left wing judges refused to consider any cases. The non-left wing judges due to fear of attack by democrat fascists who destroyed cities all year.

It doesn’t say that. It says the manner of the election is determined by the legislature. That’s not the same thing.

But it is the same thing. Read what you wrote.
No honest person would accept the numbers of this election. An audit was warranted but not granted due to bias and/or fear of reprisal.
Ox-Bow election.

It’s not. Method and means are not quite the same.

The numbers are legitimate. The people who don’t want to accept them merely can’t come to terms with losing.

The numbers are suspicious to say the least. Only dishonest people believe otherwise.

When you decided before the election that Trump won, then any number that doesn’t result in that outcome would seem suspicious.

That doesn’t mean it is.

My interpretation is rooted in results and figures.
Anyone who doesn’t question the veracity of the 2020 election is dishonest.

So the only reason a person could come to the conclusion that the 2020 election was fair is dishonesty?

You don't think the fact that it was monitored by members of both parties could make you draw that conclusion?

Or the fact that widespread voter fraud wasn't even alleged in court besides that is by Powell. Something she now claims was done in jest.

Or the fact that the lawsuits that were actually filed by Trump were shot down almost across the board.

A few weeks ago I had a discussion with my brother about believing something to be true because it sounds logical. It took me giving an example of giving a logical but different explanation for something he believes, before he realised that theirs a difference between believing something to be true and it actually being true.

No dishonesty is required to believe something different than what you believe.

Anyone who doesn’t believe that election deserves an audit is dishonest.
The anomalies are too conspicuous to ignore.

I have no problem with auditing an election. I have a problem with claiming voter fraud happened even after audits happen. I have a problem with demanding other people having to carry the burden of paying for an audit when the margins in the election in states have a zero chance of changing the results.
I have a problem with demanding audits when no credible reason for it can be established in a court of law.

There are several safeguards in place to ensure voter fraud is minimal. Measures that are enforced by members of both parties. Measures that allow an aggrieved party to challenge the election result. Measures that are arbitrated by the judicial system that is equally bipartisan.

If after all those safeguards have been applied you still are not satisfied that is just tough and by no means dishonesty on the part of those that have been satisfied.

 

[Lastamender]

Seriously?
You know that little about the law? Do you think Stacy Abrahms could fit into one of those boxes?

Go on. Show me the law that you think i need to know more about.

All of it. Start wherever you wish.

 

[The Banker]

Trump's lawyers, including Giuliani, presented blah blah blah

View attachment 472241 View attachment 472242


Not asking the lawyers. Not about the courts. THis is about the EVIDENCE you keep saying has all been debunked yet can never produce a shred of proof that it has.

I already produced the proof. The judges saw the evidence and said it was not credible. Then Sydney Powell said she was lying: "no reasonable person would conclude that the statements were truly statements of fact"
Case closed.

"The court finds that there is no credible or reliable evidence that the 2020 General Election in Nevada was affected by fraud.”

The Trump campaign “did not prove under any standard of proof that illegal votes were cast and counted, or legal votes were not counted at all, due to voter fraud, nor...in an amount sufficient to raise reasonable doubt as to the outcome of the election,”

Chief Justice Robert Brutinel agreed, saying Ward's challenge had failed to "present any evidence of 'misconduct,' 'illegal votes' or that the Biden Electors 'did not in fact receive the highest number of votes for office,'" he wrote — "let alone establish any degree of fraud or a sufficient error rate that would undermine the certainty of the election results."

 

[The Banker]

LIAR

View attachment 472225

The evidence was 100% to multiple courts. YOU IGNORE THIS FACT. HERE ARE SOME OF THE JUDGES WHO SAW THIS EVIDENCE RESPONSE:

"The court finds that there is no credible or reliable evidence that the 2020 General Election in Nevada was affected by fraud.”

The Trump campaign “did not prove under any standard of proof that illegal votes were cast and counted, or legal votes were not counted at all, due to voter fraud, nor...in an amount sufficient to raise reasonable doubt as to the outcome of the election,”

Chief Justice Robert Brutinel agreed, saying Ward's challenge had failed to "present any evidence of 'misconduct,' 'illegal votes' or that the Biden Electors 'did not in fact receive the highest number of votes for office,'" he wrote — "let alone establish any degree of fraud or a sufficient error rate that would undermine the certainty of the election results."

ANYBODY THAT TRIES TO CLAIM THE EVIDENCE WAS NEVER PRESENTED IS A TOTAL LIAR.

What a joke. A bunch of drivel pasted here unsupported by even a link to the source! Admit it fool, you got nothing. The election was a fraud and Biden is an illegal usurper in the WH who should be locked up for impersonating a president.

Courts Repeatedly Ignored Merits Of Trump’s Election Claims

The losing side needed to know that a fair shake was given, and that justice prevailed, even if it wasn't the outcome they wanted. That did not happen.

thefederalist.com

Trump's lawyers, including Giuliani, presented all the fake evidence in court, in front of Trump appointed judges, in different states. Every judge that saw the fake evidence rejected it:

"The court finds that there is no credible or reliable evidence that the 2020 General Election in Nevada was affected by fraud.”

The Trump campaign “did not prove under any standard of proof that illegal votes were cast and counted, or legal votes were not counted at all, due to voter fraud, nor...in an amount sufficient to raise reasonable doubt as to the outcome of the election,”

Chief Justice Robert Brutinel agreed, saying Ward's challenge had failed to "present any evidence of 'misconduct,' 'illegal votes' or that the Biden Electors 'did not in fact receive the highest number of votes for office,'" he wrote — "let alone establish any degree of fraud or a sufficient error rate that would undermine the certainty of the election results."

A look at what several state supreme courts said about rejecting attempts to overturn Biden's election win

Supreme Courts in several states have rejected efforts by the Trump campaign. Here is a look at what some of those courts had to say.

www.usatoday.com

Trump Campaign Has ‘No Credible Or Reliable Evidence’ Proving Voter Fraud, Nevada Court Rules

The court dismissed the campaign’s lawsuit trying to overturn the election results.

www.forbes.com

They presented no evidence in court. They never got an evidentiary hearing. They got a judge's opinion. Dumbass liar.

Nope they presented evidence and it was rejected, because it was lies. Even by Trump appointed judges.

You are just a little fuckin bitch who can't admit Trump lost. At least lose with dignity. The GOP has no dignity.

Trump did not lose. Your post is nothing but you showing your guilt. Why do you keep insisting there was no fraud? A child could see there was massive fraud and a massive conspiracy to cover that fraud up.

Admit it the election was stolen and you have no problem with a corrupt illegitimate administration. On you!

Except the judges saw the made up evidence and said it was garbage. Sydney Powell said :
"no reasonable person would conclude that the statements were truly statements of fact"
2 months later and nobody has produced any credible evidence of fraud.
Case closed.

"The court finds that there is no credible or reliable evidence that the 2020 General Election in Nevada was affected by fraud.”

The Trump campaign “did not prove under any standard of proof that illegal votes were cast and counted, or legal votes were not counted at all, due to voter fraud, nor...in an amount sufficient to raise reasonable doubt as to the outcome of the election,”

Chief Justice Robert Brutinel agreed, saying Ward's challenge had failed to "present any evidence of 'misconduct,' 'illegal votes' or that the Biden Electors 'did not in fact receive the highest number of votes for office,'" he wrote — "let alone establish any degree of fraud or a sufficient error rate that would undermine the certainty of the election results."

 

[colfax_m]

All of it. Start wherever you wish.

I just asked what law you think is relevant to the issue of PO Boxes being used as addresses for mail in ballots.

You claimed I didn’t know the law. Do you?

 

[Mac1958]

How many times did we see the Trumpsters in here all a-quiver over the latest Kracken?

 

[mamooth]

Biden really got 81 million votes and that all the irregularities

if you could show even one "irregularity", you wouldn't come across as a butthurt sore-loser trying to overthrow a fair elecction as part of a fascist coup. But you can't, so you do.

I've got reams of documentation, evidence and proof that the election was a fraud including many ADMITTING TO DOING IT!

So, the voices in your head told you that the rants you got off kook conspiracy blogs were "documentation"? Pity that the courts are laughing at you. And that law enforcement is laughing at you. And that everyone is laughing at you. You've got nothing, which is why all you can do here is make crap up.

 

[Lastamender]

LIAR

View attachment 472225

The evidence was 100% to multiple courts. YOU IGNORE THIS FACT. HERE ARE SOME OF THE JUDGES WHO SAW THIS EVIDENCE RESPONSE:

"The court finds that there is no credible or reliable evidence that the 2020 General Election in Nevada was affected by fraud.”

The Trump campaign “did not prove under any standard of proof that illegal votes were cast and counted, or legal votes were not counted at all, due to voter fraud, nor...in an amount sufficient to raise reasonable doubt as to the outcome of the election,”

Chief Justice Robert Brutinel agreed, saying Ward's challenge had failed to "present any evidence of 'misconduct,' 'illegal votes' or that the Biden Electors 'did not in fact receive the highest number of votes for office,'" he wrote — "let alone establish any degree of fraud or a sufficient error rate that would undermine the certainty of the election results."

ANYBODY THAT TRIES TO CLAIM THE EVIDENCE WAS NEVER PRESENTED IS A TOTAL LIAR.

What a joke. A bunch of drivel pasted here unsupported by even a link to the source! Admit it fool, you got nothing. The election was a fraud and Biden is an illegal usurper in the WH who should be locked up for impersonating a president.

Courts Repeatedly Ignored Merits Of Trump’s Election Claims

The losing side needed to know that a fair shake was given, and that justice prevailed, even if it wasn't the outcome they wanted. That did not happen.

thefederalist.com

Trump's lawyers, including Giuliani, presented all the fake evidence in court, in front of Trump appointed judges, in different states. Every judge that saw the fake evidence rejected it:

"The court finds that there is no credible or reliable evidence that the 2020 General Election in Nevada was affected by fraud.”

The Trump campaign “did not prove under any standard of proof that illegal votes were cast and counted, or legal votes were not counted at all, due to voter fraud, nor...in an amount sufficient to raise reasonable doubt as to the outcome of the election,”

Chief Justice Robert Brutinel agreed, saying Ward's challenge had failed to "present any evidence of 'misconduct,' 'illegal votes' or that the Biden Electors 'did not in fact receive the highest number of votes for office,'" he wrote — "let alone establish any degree of fraud or a sufficient error rate that would undermine the certainty of the election results."

A look at what several state supreme courts said about rejecting attempts to overturn Biden's election win

Supreme Courts in several states have rejected efforts by the Trump campaign. Here is a look at what some of those courts had to say.

www.usatoday.com

Trump Campaign Has ‘No Credible Or Reliable Evidence’ Proving Voter Fraud, Nevada Court Rules

The court dismissed the campaign’s lawsuit trying to overturn the election results.

www.forbes.com

They presented no evidence in court. They never got an evidentiary hearing. They got a judge's opinion. Dumbass liar.

Nope they presented evidence and it was rejected, because it was lies. Even by Trump appointed judges.

You are just a little fuckin bitch who can't admit Trump lost. At least lose with dignity. The GOP has no dignity.

Trump did not lose. Your post is nothing but you showing your guilt. Why do you keep insisting there was no fraud? A child could see there was massive fraud and a massive conspiracy to cover that fraud up.

Admit it the election was stolen and you have no problem with a corrupt illegitimate administration. On you!

Except the judges saw the made up evidence and said it was garbage. Sydney Powell said :
"no reasonable person would conclude that the statements were truly statements of fact"
2 months later and nobody has produced any credible evidence of fraud.
Case closed.

"The court finds that there is no credible or reliable evidence that the 2020 General Election in Nevada was affected by fraud.”

The Trump campaign “did not prove under any standard of proof that illegal votes were cast and counted, or legal votes were not counted at all, due to voter fraud, nor...in an amount sufficient to raise reasonable doubt as to the outcome of the election,”

Chief Justice Robert Brutinel agreed, saying Ward's challenge had failed to "present any evidence of 'misconduct,' 'illegal votes' or that the Biden Electors 'did not in fact receive the highest number of votes for office,'" he wrote — "let alone establish any degree of fraud or a sufficient error rate that would undermine the certainty of the election results."

Like I said a corrupt judges opinion. No one cares. The fraud was obvious.

 

[Lastamender]

How many times did we see the Trumpsters in here all a-quiver over the latest Kracken?

I liked the data that proved fraud better. There is plenty of that. That never got to any court because it would have proven fraud.

 

[Lastamender]

All of it. Start wherever you wish.

I just asked what law you think is relevant to the issue of PO Boxes being used as addresses for mail in ballots.

You claimed I didn’t know the law. Do you?

Of course it is not legal. Why do you think it came out? Do you know somebody that lives in a little box besides homeless people?