Sydney Powell's "Excuse" puts the BIG LIE of election fraud to rest...

[The Banker]

It is over, there was no election fraud, and no evidence of fraud.
They made it up.
Powell made it up.
Trump made it up.

And you dumb fucks believed it...

"No reasonable person would conclude that the statements were truly statements of fact"

This could be the most ridiculous excuse in the history of excuses, but either way she has said it. NO FRAUD.

Sidney Powell Says She's Not Guilty of Defamation Because 'No Reasonable Person' Would Have Believed Her 'Outlandish' Election Conspiracy Theory

The former Trump campaign lawyer insists her allegations about systematic voting fraud were not "statements of fact."

reason.com

 

[Lastamender]

The fraud was massive and obvious. End of story.

 

[Mac1958]

It is over, there was no election fraud, and no evidence of fraud.
They made it up.
Powell made it up.
Trump made it up.

And you dumb fucks believed it...

"No reasonable person would conclude that the statements were truly statements of fact"

This could be the most ridiculous excuse in the history of excuses, but either way she has said it. NO FRAUD.

Sidney Powell Says She's Not Guilty of Defamation Because 'No Reasonable Person' Would Have Believed Her 'Outlandish' Election Conspiracy Theory

The former Trump campaign lawyer insists her allegations about systematic voting fraud were not "statements of fact."

reason.com

Nope. Nothing matters.

Trump himself could admit it, and they STILL wouldn't believe it. The Big Lie will live on. They're emotionally invested in it.

Trump's Trumpsters are now even more Trumpy than Trump himself. They're on their own planet.

 

[TNHarley]

Crazy how they keep laughing in the face of those that went along with this and they dont even care.

 

[The Banker]

The fraud was massive and obvious. End of story.

Too bad even Sydney Powel doesn't agree with you now.

You made it up, and there is no credible evidence to support the big lie.

 

[Foreigner Looking In.]

It's not just about fraud.
Having different rules in one State and not another. Barring observers. Refusing signature verification. Counting votes after deadlines in Blue counties. Not checking if addresses exist. Not checking I.D.
None of these irregularities would be accepted in any other western nation.

 

[colfax_m]

Having different rules in one State and not another.

Except that’s exactly what the constitution allows. Specifically.

 

[The Banker]

It's not just about fraud.
Having different rules in one State and not another. Barring observers. Refusing signature verification. Counting votes after deadlines in Blue counties. Not checking if addresses exist. Not checking I.D.
None of these irregularities would be accepted in any other western nation.

None of it happened at all.
You people just made it up. You fabricated it. That's why it is called THE BIG LIE.

Nobody has provide real factual proof of fraud at all, any fake claims of fraud have all been proven to be lies.

 

[konradv]

The fraud was massive and obvious. End of story.

 

[konradv]

It's not just about fraud. Having different rules in one State and not another. Barring observers. Refusing signature verification. Counting votes after deadlines in Blue counties. Not checking if addresses exist. Not checking I.D. None of these irregularities would be accepted in any other western nation.

As someone who's just looking in, perhaps you should acquaint yourself with the Constitution before commenting.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Having different rules in one State and not another.

Except that’s exactly what the constitution allows. Specifically.

But the constitution forbids states from changing election rules without legislation.

 

[colfax_m]

Having different rules in one State and not another.

Except that’s exactly what the constitution allows. Specifically.

But the constitution forbids states from changing election rules without legislation.

Not really. There’s a difference about methods and means. The method of electing the electors is decided by the legislation. That is, a popular vote. The means is how that vote occurs. There’s many, many decisions made by the administration of each state that aren’t spelled out in legislation that need to be made, but none of them change the method of the election, a popular vote.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Having different rules in one State and not another.

Except that’s exactly what the constitution allows. Specifically.

But the constitution forbids states from changing election rules without legislation.

Not really. There’s a difference about methods and means. The method of electing the electors is decided by the legislation. That is, a popular vote. The means is how that vote occurs. There’s many, many decisions made by the administration of each state that aren’t spelled out in legislation that need to be made, but none of them change the method of the election, a popular vote.

The constitution forbids states from changing election rules without legislation.

 

[konradv]

Having different rules in one State and not another.

Except that’s exactly what the constitution allows. Specifically.

But the constitution forbids states from changing election rules without legislation.

Cite?

 

[Foreigner Looking In.]

It's not just about fraud. Having different rules in one State and not another. Barring observers. Refusing signature verification. Counting votes after deadlines in Blue counties. Not checking if addresses exist. Not checking I.D. None of these irregularities would be accepted in any other western nation.

As someone who's just looking in, perhaps you should acquaint yourself with the Constitution before commenting.

Where in the Constitution does it say States have rights to keep out observers......or extend counting time for several days after other states have ended. Or refusing audit?
Are you referring to the P.R.C Constitution?

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

60% of Biden votes were mail-in yet democrats required virtually zero mail-ins.
Wuhan is riskiest for over-70 and military overseas require mail-ins. Both groups vote heavily republican.

 

[Foreigner Looking In.]

Having different rules in one State and not another.

Except that’s exactly what the constitution allows. Specifically.

But the constitution forbids states from changing election rules without legislation.

Cite?

It's a breach of the 14th Amendment.

 

[colfax_m]

It's not just about fraud. Having different rules in one State and not another. Barring observers. Refusing signature verification. Counting votes after deadlines in Blue counties. Not checking if addresses exist. Not checking I.D. None of these irregularities would be accepted in any other western nation.

As someone who's just looking in, perhaps you should acquaint yourself with the Constitution before commenting.

Where in the Constitution does it say States have rights to keep out observers......or extend counting time for several days after other states have ended. Or refusing audit?
Are you referring to the P.R.C Constitution?

States didn’t keep out observers but the constitution doesn’t say anything about states having to have observers. It doesn’t say anything about how the votes are counted or audited.

The constitution lets the states decide. It gives dates the states have to hit. Election on this day. Electors are counted on this day. That’s it.

Have you read the constitition?

 

[colfax_m]

60% of Biden votes were mail-in yet democrats required virtually zero mail-ins.
Wuhan is riskiest for over-70 and military overseas require mail-ins. Both groups vote heavily republican.

Most states don’t have requirements for mailing in a ballot.

 

[candycorn]

It's not just about fraud.
Having different rules in one State and not another. Barring observers. Refusing signature verification. Counting votes after deadlines in Blue counties. Not checking if addresses exist. Not checking I.D.
None of these irregularities would be accepted in any other western nation.

Did Sidney Powell tell you all that happened too? She also said that the US Military raided a server farm in Germany. Sure you want to stay on that sinking ship?