Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Court said they had to make another ruling, it was remanded to them. The Admin can't go back in time and release the funds
If you would have read your link, it address that:
“The unsigned order does not actually require the Trump administration to immediately make up to $2 billion in foreign aid payments; it merely clears the way for the district court to compel those payments, presumably if it is more specific about the contracts that have to be honored,”
It's been answered, and yet you ask 'why.'
I think you forgot to mention a few things...
A divided Supreme Court on Wednesday rejected the Trump administration’s request to keep billions of dollars in foreign aid approved by Congress frozen.
However, the court did not immediately say when the money must be released, allowing the White House to continue to dispute the issue in lower courts.
This is what your posted " So they rule "two weeks", or something similar. It is going to be released."LOL, you all argue my points pretending you are arguing something different than I. LOL
Yes, they have to come up with a timeline other than 36 hours. I've noted that many times.
I've addressed that multiple times. LOL
Divided SCOTUS, funds are still frozen and Trump can continue to fight it in the lower courts. This isn't settled by any means.The lower court already ruled. The court simply said they needed to come up with a more reasonable time line. Yes it was divided, but the majority ruled.
Imagine what a simple reading of the opinion will do.No, you have ignored the first part of the actual order, telling the district judge he can't just say "pay them all", he has to give specific directives on who has to be paid.
The laterImagine what a simple reading of the opinion will do.
Is pknopp and John asking the question because they want to know the answer, or is it they ask the question because they don't like the answer?
Imagine what a simple reading of the opinion will do.
Is pknopp and John asking the question because they want to know the answer, or is it they ask the question because they don't like the answer?
Probably because they were likely to appeal it to the Supreme Court.The administration didn't even counter the ruling, only the time frame because they knew they would lose.
The majority noted that the administration had not challenged Ali’s initial order, only the deadline, which in any event passed last week.
Supreme Court reinstates order for the Trump administration to un-freeze foreign aid
Er... then why did the Supreme Court rule on it?Then they could have. They didn't.
It has already been answered several times, so, no, guys, "not just once more.""Why"
Is the first step to understanding. Marty answered the "why" with the opinion.
For you, there is no "why."
The inferior court was not told he was wrong but to investigate more. You are bound by that as well. Get over it.The district court's "answer" has been invalidated and the court has been told what to do.
Yeah, Marty answered it. You ignored it, several times.It has already been answered several times, so, no, guys, "not just once more."
Retarded Horses ^ is braying.It has already been answered several times, so, no, guys, "not just once more."
Er... then why did the Supreme Court rule on it?
An emergency appeal by the Trump Administration.