Supreme Court smacks Trump down on foreign aid.

And 36 hours was implied in the order as being unreasonable.

You aren't winning this, you aspie ****, give up.

I've addressed that multiple times. LOL
 
The Court said they had to make another ruling, it was remanded to them. The Admin can't go back in time and release the funds

If you would have read your link, it address that:
“The unsigned order does not actually require the Trump administration to immediately make up to $2 billion in foreign aid payments; it merely clears the way for the district court to compel those payments, presumably if it is more specific about the contracts that have to be honored,”

LOL, you all argue my points pretending you are arguing something different than I. LOL

Yes, they have to come up with a timeline other than 36 hours. I've noted that many times.
 
I think you forgot to mention a few things...

A divided Supreme Court on Wednesday rejected the Trump administration’s request to keep billions of dollars in foreign aid approved by Congress frozen.

However, the court did not immediately say when the money must be released, allowing the White House to continue to dispute the issue in lower courts.

The lower court already ruled. The court simply said they needed to come up with a more reasonable time line. Yes it was divided, but the majority ruled.
 
LOL, you all argue my points pretending you are arguing something different than I. LOL

Yes, they have to come up with a timeline other than 36 hours. I've noted that many times.
This is what your posted " So they rule "two weeks", or something similar. It is going to be released."

I asked for a link to that ruling, you can't provide one, cause you lied
 
The lower court already ruled. The court simply said they needed to come up with a more reasonable time line. Yes it was divided, but the majority ruled.
Divided SCOTUS, funds are still frozen and Trump can continue to fight it in the lower courts. This isn't settled by any means.
 
No, you have ignored the first part of the actual order, telling the district judge he can't just say "pay them all", he has to give specific directives on who has to be paid.
Imagine what a simple reading of the opinion will do.

Is pknopp and John asking the question because they want to know the answer, or is it they ask the question because they don't like the answer?
 
Imagine what a simple reading of the opinion will do.

Is pknopp and John asking the question because they want to know the answer, or is it they ask the question because they don't like the answer?

I think it's because pknopp is incapable of admitting he may have been in error.

For John it's because he a ******* troll moron.
 
15th post
It has already been answered several times, so, no, guys, "not just once more."
Retarded Horses ^ is braying.

In any event, back ON topic:

The SCOTUS didn’t “smack down” President Trump. Plus, the underlying litigation is continuing.
 
Er... then why did the Supreme Court rule on it?

An emergency appeal by the Trump Administration.

They argued the 36 hours was unreasonable. The court agreed and instructed the lower court to enact a more reasonable time line.
 
Back
Top Bottom