What of it? It was a temporary set back — and even assuming it shouldn’t have been the decision — it was not a “smack down.”
Only to those with no hearing. Dopes like you.
lol. If the billionaire Trump thinks his money can buy anyone or anything in America, he will undoubtedly fail again.
Hey, moron. Try providing the source of your material including its footnotes.lol. If the billionaire Trump thinks his money can buy anyone or anything in America, he will undoubtedly fail again.
Here's why:
Legal Enforcement Mechanisms: The U.S. legal system has mechanisms to enforce court rulings. If the Trump administration fails to comply with the Supreme Court's decision, the affected parties can seek further legal action, such as contempt proceedings against the government. This could involve Judge Amir Ali, who issued the original order, holding hearings to ensure compliance and potentially imposing penalties for non-compliance47.
Judicial Oversight: The judiciary, particularly U.S. District Judge Amir Ali, is actively involved in overseeing the case. Judge Ali has already issued a temporary restraining order and is expected to hold further hearings to ensure that the government complies with the court's directives47.
Congressional Appropriations: The funds in question were appropriated by Congress, and the Supreme Court's ruling upholds the obligation to disburse these funds as mandated by Congress. This means that the administration's actions are also subject to congressional oversight and potential legislative intervention6.
sources:
1. https://www.reuters.com/legal/us-su...mp-promptly-pay-foreign-aid-groups-2025-03-05
2. The Supreme Court Foreign-Aid Ruling Is a Bad Sign for Trump
3. Trump’s lawyers just made a $2 billion mistake
4. Supreme Court denies Trump request to block $2 billion foreign-aid payment - SCOTUSblog
5. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/03/05/supreme-court-usaid-spending-freeze/
6. Supreme Court Rejects Trump’s Bid to Freeze Foreign Aid
7. https://www.npr.org/2025/03/05/nx-s1-5309498/scotus-usaid-news
8. https://time.com/7264765/supreme-court-trump-foreign-aid-case/
9. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/fact-checking-trumps-2025-address-to-congress
10. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c5y071kxwn8o
11. https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/sup...nfreeze-foreign-assistance/story?id=119473127
12. https://www.cnn.com/2025/03/05/politics/supreme-court-usaid-foreign-aid/index.html
13. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/su...rations-bid-avoid-paying-usaid-con-rcna194230
the ussc has just condoned criminal activity. usaid was nothing more than a criminal enterprise. Sure money was appropriated by congress . But that don't mean you give money to organizations that have only been in existence a few weeks
I must point out to you that the Supreme Court made a decision based on money that was already spent AND that the ones due to get paid had already done the work. That's it. Don't take it as a big win.
That is your opinion only.
Well sure, only fealty and obedience please Trump. He is a malignant narcissist, after all.
She is kind of cute.
I always thought she would not a 100% trumper humper.
Your title is a lie....All SCOTUS did, is tell them to play it out in the lower courts before bringing it to them....This is a prime example of how a pseudo independent who is really a leftist lies.
