Supreme Court smacks Trump down on foreign aid.

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Yeah, Marty answered it. You ignored it, several times.

Yes, it's been answered but Marty keeps ignoring it.

 

[BackAgain]

It's been answered, and yet you ask 'why.'

You’re wrong. A decision about a lower court case imposing a temporary order isn’t a decision on the merits of the yet unresolved case.

 

[martybegan]

The inferior court was not told he was wrong but to investigate more. You are bound by that as well. Get over it.

He was told he was wrong to issue a TRO without details.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

He was told he was wrong to issue a TRO without details.

Nope.

 

[citygator]

ACB gives Trump the stink eye after ruling against him. Gotta love it.

 

[BackAgain]

ACB gives Trump the stink eye after ruling against him. Gotta love it.

No stink eye.

What a bullshit claim from shittycroc.

 

[BrokeLoser]

The second time the court has refused to step in to help Trump.

Congress passed it, it was signed, Trump can't just pretend he can end it.

https://www.cnn.com/2025/03/05/politics/supreme-court-usaid-foreign-aid/index.html

Supreme Court smacks Trump down on foreign aid.​

“When America Wins The Left Loses…Every Single Time”

 

[struth]

They argued the 36 hours was unreasonable. The court agreed and instructed the lower court to enact a more reasonable time line.

That was not what was appealed. They appealed the stay of the EO.

What the scotus ruled was the stay was ok, but the district judge needs to make clear just what contracts need to be honored, they limited it

What will be appealed by either side is the ultimate outcome of the case itself

 

[excalibur]

The second time the court has refused to step in to help Trump.

Congress passed it, it was signed, Trump can't just pretend he can end it.

https://www.cnn.com/2025/03/05/politics/supreme-court-usaid-foreign-aid/index.html

Not what they said.

This is what they actually said:

...

Given that the deadline in the challenged order has now passed, and in light of the ongoing preliminary injunction proceedings, the District Court should clarify what obligations the Government must fulfill to ensure compliance with the temporary restraining order, with due regard for the feasibility of any compliance timelines.​

Search

www.supremecourt.gov

 

[pknopp]

Not what they said.

This is what they actually said:

...​

​

Given that the deadline in the challenged order has now passed, and in light of the ongoing preliminary injunction proceedings, the District Court should clarify what obligations the Government must fulfill to ensure compliance with the temporary restraining order, with due regard for the feasibility of any compliance timelines.​

Search

www.supremecourt.gov

Timeline.....I've addressed this many times already.

The only question is the timeline.

 

[excalibur]

Timeline.....I've addressed this many times already.

The only question is the timeline.

LOL

So you admit your thread's headline is fake. All SCOTUS did was send it back, for now, to the District Court.

 

[WEATHER53]

That was not what was appealed. They appealed the stay of the EO.

What the scotus ruled was the stay was ok, but the district judge needs to make clear just what contracts need to be honored, they limited it

What will be appealed by either side is the ultimate outcome of the case itself

That’s too much work for this “judge” . They do hit and run President attacks only. The judge will produce nothing

 

[WEATHER53]

LOL

So you admit your thread's headline is fake. All SCOTUS did was send it back, for now, to the District Court.

Fake lib loon thread titles are permitted with very rare intercessions

 

[pknopp]

LOL

So you admit your thread's headline is fake. All SCOTUS did was send it back, for now, to the District Court.

No, headline is legit. You seem more concerned over me stating that Trump was smacked down as opposed to the fact he lost in the court.

The money is going to be released.

 

[BackAgain]

No, headline is legit.

No. It’s not. It’s distorted and intentionally so. There was no “smack down” involved.

You seem more concerned over me stating that Trump was smacked down as opposed to the fact he lost in the court.

It wasn’t a loss. The merits of the case have yet to be reached. I suspect you know as much. That makes people wonder why you instead choose to lie?

The money is going to be released.

Maybe. Maybe not.

It’s sure AF that you don’t know.

 

[excalibur]

No, headline is legit. You seem more concerned over me stating that Trump was smacked down as opposed to the fact he lost in the court.

The money is going to be released.

There was no smackdown. All SCOTUS did was remand back to the District Court, for now.

Also, some of the money requests were reviewed and then paid out already. That was the purpose of the freeze.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Supreme Court smacks Trump down on foreign aid.​

“When America Wins The Left Loses…Every Single Time”

That makes no sense. Trump gets smacked down, so its the Left that loses?

 

[BackAgain]

That makes no sense. Trump gets smacked down, so it’s the Left that loses?

There was no smack down.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

shitler will spend the money.

shitler will do as the judge commands.

 

[pknopp]

No. It’s not. It’s distorted and intentionally so. There was no “smack down” involved.

Read Alito's reaction.

It wasn’t a loss. The merits of the case have yet to be reached. I suspect you know as much. That makes people wonder why you instead choose to lie?

Maybe. Maybe not.

It’s sure AF that you don’t know.

Lol.....you sound like Dan Rather the night Bush beat Kerry where he argued all night that Kerry hadn't lost yet.