Supreme Court shows unflinching regard for Trump

[Frankenstein]

Here.
What does Biden have to do with Trump not releasing the files, he said he would?

I don't hear of ANYONE objecting except Trump and his cult.

View attachment 1143601

Because as usual, democrats on this board and in society have no clue they just parrot rachel madcow and company

 

[BackAgain]

View attachment 1143600









AWWW, I bet you compliment every one who exposes your fraud of a dear leader.

You’re quite a dullard.

 

[JimH52]

“Ever since Chief Justice John Roberts swore in Donald Trump at the US Capitol January 20 – with the eight other Supreme Court justices looking on – the question has been whether they would restrain a president who vowed to upend the constitutional order.

The answer, a half-year later, is no.

That was underscored this month by the court’s decisions allowing Trump to fire another set of independent regulators, to dismantle the Department of Education and to deport migrants to dangerous countries where they have no citizenship or connection.

Meanwhile, the fissures among the nine have deepened. They have condemned each other in written opinions and revealed the personal strains in public appearances.”

Supreme Court shows unflinching regard for Trump

Ever since Chief Justice John Roberts swore in Donald Trump at the US Capitol January 20 – with the eight other Supreme Court justices looking on – the question has been whether they would restrain a ...

www.yahoo.com

The Court’s codification of unitary executive dogma was one of its worst, most destructive, decisions.

The court is ignoring the constitution in order to allow the Felon on Chief to hold unprecedented powers in the Executive branch. We are swifting sliding down an authoritarian slope.

Now the criminal in the WH. one of many l, wants to rule DC.

 

[struth]

The court is ignoring the constitution in order to allow the Felon on Chief to hold unprecedented powers in the Executive branch. We are swifting sliding down an authoritarian slope.

Now the criminal in the WH. one of many l, wants to rule DC.

What unprecedented powers?

 

[Robert W]

The rule of Law has gone out the window, we are on our way to a dictatorship.

Enjoy the dictatorship all night long

 

[Robert W]

The court is ignoring the constitution in order to allow the Felon on Chief to hold unprecedented powers in the Executive branch. We are swifting sliding down an authoritarian slope.

Now the criminal in the WH. one of many l, wants to rule DC.

Whacky is the standard talk of democrats.

 

[Robert W]

The rule of Law has gone out the window, we are on our way to a dictatorship.

It started due to Obama followed by Biden. Trump can solve it though.

 

[BackAgain]

“Ever since Chief Justice John Roberts swore in Donald Trump at the US Capitol January 20 – with the eight other Supreme Court justices looking on – the question has been whether they would restrain a president who vowed to upend the constitutional order.

The answer, a half-year later, is no.

That was underscored this month by the court’s decisions allowing Trump to fire another set of independent regulators, to dismantle the Department of Education and to deport migrants to dangerous countries where they have no citizenship or connection.

Meanwhile, the fissures among the nine have deepened. They have condemned each other in written opinions and revealed the personal strains in public appearances.”

Supreme Court shows unflinching regard for Trump

Ever since Chief Justice John Roberts swore in Donald Trump at the US Capitol January 20 – with the eight other Supreme Court justices looking on – the question has been whether they would restrain a ...

www.yahoo.com

The Court’s codification of unitary executive dogma was one of its worst, most destructive, decisions.

It shouldn’t come as a surprise that the Executive Branch IS “unitary.” For anyone familiar with Art II, that “dogma” is already pretty freakin’ obvious.

It looks like the SCOTUS has ruled (in general terms) for the Administration (so far) in maybe 80% of the emergency cases.

The Administration’s position (ie, the U.S. government’s position) on the “on the merits” decisions have gone 50 - 50.

This does not show any “unflinching regard” for the President.