Dogmaphobe
Diamond Member
The anti-American algorithm responsible for this thread said "Trump" in the title of its propaganda posting when it should have said "constitution".
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You're trying to use logic on a dimocrap scumbag?The Supreme Court Judges of the United States must judge each case on whether or not it is Constitutional, not personal preference. In cases where you see all nine judges, some being appointed by leftist presidents, agree on a case, there is no doubt that there is no doubt whatsoever that the case is Constitutionally valid. When the court isn't in complete agreement, that falls on differing opinions of the Constitution and its Bill of Rights in relation to the case before them.
The President of the United States is the absolute head of the Executive Branch and any federal agency that falls under the purview of the Executive Branch is subject to that branch's decision as to how many personnel work in the agency or whether such agency continues to exist.












Here you go dembotQueen Coon will jump up quick if you say something about massa Trump, release those Epstein files.
1) So nobody was charged with treason, and therefore no traitors were pardon. Thanks for highlighting you are a liar.They attacked the capitol, numb nuts and sentenced to prison.
Really?
Post it.
That's what your dear leader claims, Q-NUT.
WTF?
What woman allows perfect strangers to do that?
Not even hookers allow that.
She wasn't forced, moron.
That is Epstein and Trump's thing.
Jury finds Trump liable for sexual abuse, awards E. Jean ...
View attachment 1142811
AP News
https://apnews.com › article › trump-rape-carroll-trial-f...
May 9, 2023 — A jury has found Donald Trump liable for sexually abusing advice columnist E. Jean Carroll in 1996. Jurors awarded her $5 million in a ...
Agreed, your dear leader IS sick.
Why does allowing the Chief Executive to control the Executive branch bother you so much?The supreme court should be on the back of this mug
View attachment 1142707
I still don't believe, and never will, that Epstein killed himself.Here you go dembot
![]()
Attorney General Pamela Bondi Releases First Phase of Declassified Epstein Files
Today, Attorney General Pamela Bondi, in conjunction with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), declassified and publicly released files related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and his sexual exploitation of over 250 underage girls at his homes in New York and Florida, among other...www.justice.gov
Hilarious you think that's what's happening!Why does allowing the Chief Executive to control the Executive branch bother you so much?
Sad that you don't understand that's what happening. THen again, virtually all of your posts these days are driven by hate and emotion.Hilarious you think that's what's happening!
But, hasn't the scouts handed trump defeat on several issues?“Ever since Chief Justice John Roberts swore in Donald Trump at the US Capitol January 20 – with the eight other Supreme Court justices looking on – the question has been whether they would restrain a president who vowed to upend the constitutional order.
The answer, a half-year later, is no.
That was underscored this month by the court’s decisions allowing Trump to fire another set of independent regulators, to dismantle the Department of Education and to deport migrants to dangerous countries where they have no citizenship or connection.
Meanwhile, the fissures among the nine have deepened. They have condemned each other in written opinions and revealed the personal strains in public appearances.”
![]()
Supreme Court shows unflinching regard for Trump
Ever since Chief Justice John Roberts swore in Donald Trump at the US Capitol January 20 – with the eight other Supreme Court justices looking on – the question has been whether they would restrain a ...www.yahoo.com
The Court’s codification of unitary executive dogma was one of its worst, most destructive, decisions.
312-226 facediaper. Real Americans speak and SCOTUS rules by the law of the land. You commies lose.“Ever since Chief Justice John Roberts swore in Donald Trump at the US Capitol January 20 – with the eight other Supreme Court justices looking on – the question has been whether they would restrain a president who vowed to upend the constitutional order.
The answer, a half-year later, is no.
That was underscored this month by the court’s decisions allowing Trump to fire another set of independent regulators, to dismantle the Department of Education and to deport migrants to dangerous countries where they have no citizenship or connection.
Meanwhile, the fissures among the nine have deepened. They have condemned each other in written opinions and revealed the personal strains in public appearances.”
![]()
Supreme Court shows unflinching regard for Trump
Ever since Chief Justice John Roberts swore in Donald Trump at the US Capitol January 20 – with the eight other Supreme Court justices looking on – the question has been whether they would restrain a ...www.yahoo.com
The Court’s codification of unitary executive dogma was one of its worst, most destructive, decisions.
You mean the 3 democrat morons who don't know the Law?I'm talking about the hacked court, fool.
Lol, that is not the Epstein files. Nice try.Here you go dembot
![]()
Attorney General Pamela Bondi Releases First Phase of Declassified Epstein Files
Today, Attorney General Pamela Bondi, in conjunction with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), declassified and publicly released files related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and his sexual exploitation of over 250 underage girls at his homes in New York and Florida, among other...www.justice.gov
If zero is “many” to asshole ls like you, then go with that.The many ethics scandals of Clarence and Ginni Thomas ...
View attachment 1142740
vox.com
https://www.vox.com › politics › supreme-court-clarenc...
May 5, 2023 — The Supreme Court's tone-deaf response to the Clarence Thomas corruption scandal.
Supreme Court says Trump has absolute immunity for core ...
View attachment 1142743
NPR
https://www.npr.org › 2024/07/01 › nx-s1-5002157 › s...
Jul 1, 2024 — The Supreme Court granted substantial immunity from prosecution to former president Donald Trump on election subversion charges.
Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito Are “Subject to ...
View attachment 1142742
The New Republic
https://newrepublic.com › breaking-news
Jul 11, 2024 — “The abuses of power committed by Justice Thomas and Justice Alito are precisely the types of corruption that the Framers [of the Constitution] ...
The Self-Serving Supreme Court Is Exonerating Corrupt ...
View attachment 1142741
Common Dreams
https://www.commondreams.org › opinion › supreme-c...
Oct 30, 2024 — The justices responsible for weakening our anti-corruption laws include not just Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, whose records of ...
Republicans love and defend their criminals.
Poor delusional Q-NUT.If zero is “many” to asshole ls like you, then go with that.
Did I mention that you’re an asshole? Sure, it’s already painfully apparent. But I’m here to remind you. You’re welcome.
Um it literally says Epstein fileLol, that is not the Epstein files. Nice try.
I’m not a Q-Anon adherent, either. You speak a lot of shit which you obviously just make up as to compost each of your mindless drivel posts.Poor delusional Q-NUT.
I don’t have a dear leader. Maybe you do. Pretty pathetic of you.Like your dear leader,
Now you’re just projecting. I am the one who speaks the truth. You lie ceaselessly.IGNORE the TRUTH.
I don’t. Never have. Never will. And, again, you saying something and it being truthful are worlds apart.Protect child molesters and criminals.
Another day another cry fest!“Ever since Chief Justice John Roberts swore in Donald Trump at the US Capitol January 20 – with the eight other Supreme Court justices looking on – the question has been whether they would restrain a president who vowed to upend the constitutional order.
The answer, a half-year later, is no.
That was underscored this month by the court’s decisions allowing Trump to fire another set of independent regulators, to dismantle the Department of Education and to deport migrants to dangerous countries where they have no citizenship or connection.
Meanwhile, the fissures among the nine have deepened. They have condemned each other in written opinions and revealed the personal strains in public appearances.”
![]()
Supreme Court shows unflinching regard for Trump
Ever since Chief Justice John Roberts swore in Donald Trump at the US Capitol January 20 – with the eight other Supreme Court justices looking on – the question has been whether they would restrain a ...www.yahoo.com
The Court’s codification of unitary executive dogma was one of its worst, most destructive, decisions.
Joan Biskupic, CNN's Chief Supreme Court Analyst, is known for her in-depth coverage of the Supreme Court and has written several books on the topic, including "Nine Black Robes: Inside the Supreme Court's Drive to the Right". While she is a respected journalist, some critics accuse her of having a liberal bias in her analysis, particularly when covering conservative-leaning decisions.“Ever since Chief Justice John Roberts swore in Donald Trump at the US Capitol January 20 – with the eight other Supreme Court justices looking on – the question has been whether they would restrain a president who vowed to upend the constitutional order.
The answer, a half-year later, is no.
That was underscored this month by the court’s decisions allowing Trump to fire another set of independent regulators, to dismantle the Department of Education and to deport migrants to dangerous countries where they have no citizenship or connection.
Meanwhile, the fissures among the nine have deepened. They have condemned each other in written opinions and revealed the personal strains in public appearances.”
![]()
Supreme Court shows unflinching regard for Trump
Ever since Chief Justice John Roberts swore in Donald Trump at the US Capitol January 20 – with the eight other Supreme Court justices looking on – the question has been whether they would restrain a ...www.yahoo.com
The Court’s codification of unitary executive dogma was one of its worst, most destructive, decisions.
YES, you are, LIAR.I’m not a Q-Anon adherent, either. You speak a lot of shit which you obviously just make up as to compost each of your mindless drivel posts.
You keep defending him and anyone in his cult.I don’t have a dear leader. Maybe you do. Pretty pathetic of you.
TOO funny, another lie.Now you’re just projecting. I am the one who speaks the truth. You lie ceaselessly.
I don’t. Never have. Never will. And, again, you saying something and it being truthful are worlds apart.
Cry harder.YES, you are, LIAR.
You keep defending him and anyone in his cult.
TOO funny, another lie.