Supreme Court shows unflinching regard for Trump



1753871807590.webp
 
“Ever since Chief Justice John Roberts swore in Donald Trump at the US Capitol January 20 – with the eight other Supreme Court justices looking on – the question has been whether they would restrain a president who vowed to upend the constitutional order.

The answer, a half-year later, is no.

That was underscored this month by the court’s decisions allowing Trump to fire another set of independent regulators, to dismantle the Department of Education and to deport migrants to dangerous countries where they have no citizenship or connection.

Meanwhile, the fissures among the nine have deepened. They have condemned each other in written opinions and revealed the personal strains in public appearances.”


The Court’s codification of unitary executive dogma was one of its worst, most destructive, decisions.

They are all cut from the same Federalist Society cloth. They are ideologues in robes, and they are actively supporting a counter-revolution that intends to upend and reverse all of the progress going back to the end of the 19th Century.
 
They are all cut from the same Federalist Society cloth. They are ideologues in robes, and they are actively supporting a counter-revolution that intends to upend and reverse all of the progress going back to the end of the 19th Century.
WTF are you referring to?

I'm very happy that we have a majority of strict constitutionalists on the USSC, and not democrat hacks.

Trump needs to replace Thomas with a younger version, and maybe get to replace a liberal justice.
 
Like Eric Adams.

Trump pardoned him too.

Indicted Democrat Eric Adams to meet Trump

View attachment 1142770
Politico
https://www.politico.com › news › 2025/01/16 › eric-a...
Jan 16, 2025 — Trump has openly expressed interest in pardoning Adams, and has said they face similarly bogus charges from a politicized Department of Justice ...






Adams Gets a Reprieve From Trump

View attachment 1142771
The New York Times
https://www.nytimes.com › 2025/02/11 › nyregion › ad...
Feb 11, 2025 — On Monday the Justice Department ordered federal prosecutors in Manhattan to drop the corruption charges against Adams.



Trump and his cult love their criminals, even democrats.
yea so do the democrats...they both protect their own until they cant...
 

The many ethics scandals of Clarence and Ginni Thomas ...

View attachment 1142740
vox.com
https://www.vox.com › politics › supreme-court-clarenc...
May 5, 2023 — The Supreme Court's tone-deaf response to the Clarence Thomas corruption scandal.



Supreme Court says Trump has absolute immunity for core ...

View attachment 1142743
NPR
https://www.npr.org › 2024/07/01 › nx-s1-5002157 › s...
Jul 1, 2024 — The Supreme Court granted substantial immunity from prosecution to former president Donald Trump on election subversion charges.




Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito Are “Subject to ...

View attachment 1142742
The New Republic
https://newrepublic.com › breaking-news
Jul 11, 2024 — “The abuses of power committed by Justice Thomas and Justice Alito are precisely the types of corruption that the Framers [of the Constitution] ...







The Self-Serving Supreme Court Is Exonerating Corrupt ...

View attachment 1142741
Common Dreams
https://www.commondreams.org › opinion › supreme-c...
Oct 30, 2024 — The justices responsible for weakening our anti-corruption laws include not just Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, whose records of ...


Republicans love and defend their criminals.
Your collection of liberal sites is hilarious….and to top it off with a site like Common Dreams is just stupendous….Really drives home what a complete nut job you are… :laughing0301:
 
yea so do the democrats...they both protect their own until they cant...
I would somewhat disagree with that. Throughout my life I have noticed that often Republicans throw their fellow repubs off the cliff at the slightest dust up raised by dems…Now, do dems likewise do that? Hell no…
 
I would somewhat disagree with that. Throughout my life I have noticed that often Republicans throw their fellow repubs off the cliff at the slightest dust up raised by dems…Now, do dems likewise do that? Hell no…
and i bet the lefties here would say just the opposite....
 
Your collection of liberal sites is hilarious….and to top it off with a site like Common Dreams is just stupendous….Really drives home what a complete nut job you are… :laughing0301:
Liberal sites that tell the truth about the corrupt Republican supreme court justices.

Why aren't they being sued?
 
1) nobody on Jan 6th was convicted of being a traitor
2) Trump never pardoned himself, or for that matter anyone of his family, unlike Ashley Biden's abuser
3) Trump hasn't pardoned her
4) Of course you don't believe the victims of sexual abuse, instead, as this post highlights, you just lie. Pathetic .
 
1) nobody on Jan 6th was convicted of being a traitor
Yes, they were and sentenced.
2) Trump never pardoned himself, or for that matter anyone of his family, unlike Ashley Biden's abuser
FAKE NEWS Q-NUT.
No one abused Ashley.
You're delusional, as usual.
3) Trump hasn't pardoned her
4) Of course you don't believe the victims of sexual abuse, instead, as this post highlights, you just lie. Pathetic .
You believe Trump don't you?

 
Yes, they were and sentenced.

FAKE NEWS Q-NUT.
No one abused Ashley.
You're delusional, as usual.

You believe Trump don't you?


1) who was convicted of it? Name them
2) She went into great detail about her abuse. It's sad you ignore victims
3) Believe him about what? That he's been sexually active? and women have allowed him to be? Sure. Why wouldn't idea? It's sick you don't see the difference between a woman allowing a man to "grab them" - and a minor child being forced to shower with her father. Sick.
 
15th post
1) who was convicted of it? Name them
They attacked the capitol, numb nuts and sentenced to prison.
2) She went into great detail about her abuse. It's sad you ignore victims
Really?
Post it.
3) Believe him about what? That he's been sexually active? and women have allowed him to be? Sure.
That's what your dear leader claims, Q-NUT.
Why wouldn't idea? It's sick you don't see the difference between a woman allowing a man to "grab them" -
WTF?
What woman allows perfect strangers to do that?
Not even hookers allow that.
and a minor child being forced to shower with her father.
She wasn't forced, moron.
That is Epstein and Trump's thing.

Jury finds Trump liable for sexual abuse, awards E. Jean ...​

1753880166615.webp
AP News
https://apnews.com › article › trump-rape-carroll-trial-f...
May 9, 2023 — A jury has found Donald Trump liable for sexually abusing advice columnist E. Jean Carroll in 1996. Jurors awarded her $5 million in a ...
Agreed, your dear leader IS sick.
 
I ran your accusation of Trump burning the Constitution by Grok. Because, honestly, the claim is just that hyperbolic. So hysterically exaggerated, I didn't know where to begin.

"The phrase "burning the Constitution" is more emotional than factual, often used to amplify political disagreement. It’s less about legal analysis and more about expressing distrust in Trump’s approach to governance. Both sides have valid points: critics can argue he pushes boundaries, while defenders can counter that he operates within his constitutional rights. The truth lies in the messy middle—exaggeration doesn’t clarify it."

Pretty much as I saw it too.
LMAO@ grok!!
 
“Ever since Chief Justice John Roberts swore in Donald Trump at the US Capitol January 20 – with the eight other Supreme Court justices looking on – the question has been whether they would restrain a president who vowed to upend the constitutional order.

The answer, a half-year later, is no.

That was underscored this month by the court’s decisions allowing Trump to fire another set of independent regulators, to dismantle the Department of Education and to deport migrants to dangerous countries where they have no citizenship or connection.

Meanwhile, the fissures among the nine have deepened. They have condemned each other in written opinions and revealed the personal strains in public appearances.”


The Court’s codification of unitary executive dogma was one of its worst, most destructive, decisions.
There has been an unprecedented shift of power to the Executive Branch

Lets see if SCOTUS remains so supportive of presidential power when a Democrat takes office.
 
Back
Top Bottom