Supreme Court Nominee...Biggest Issue 2016

[Fenton Lum]

Sure mac, sure. They didn't even look at him.

Show me in the Constitution where they have to look at him, his record spoke for itself.

I'm sure you have an endless list of self rationalizations and I'll leave you to them, you'd be shatting yourself if the "other" party were engaged in this type of nonsense.

They have. Also I've been telling my senators to do this for years, Kagen and Sotomayor should have never been confirmed. Judges are supposed to apply the law and Constitution as written. It's not their job to find ways to uphold defective legislation, it's not their place to rewrite laws. Any judge that thinks that is their job should never be nominated for the high court.

Funny thing, that "judicial activism", it's always on the "other" side.

Yeah, except when the person criticizes equally. If I think a judge gets it wrong, I will say so no matter who it is. Even Scalia didn't always get it right, usually in cases dealing with the interstate commerce clause.

"Yeah, except when the person criticizes equally."

At that point I would not call it activism.

 

[OKTexas]

They did, they advised the president that they were withholding consent. He's free to nominate someone else.

Sure mac, sure. They didn't even look at him.

Show me in the Constitution where they have to look at him, his record spoke for itself.

I'm sure you have an endless list of self rationalizations and I'll leave you to them, you'd be shatting yourself if the "other" party were engaged in this type of nonsense.

They have. Also I've been telling my senators to do this for years, Kagen and Sotomayor should have never been confirmed. Judges are supposed to apply the law and Constitution as written. It's not their job to find ways to uphold defective legislation, it's not their place to rewrite laws. Any judge that thinks that is their job should never be nominated for the high court.

Both are socialist political hacks.

They think they aren't bound by their oaths to support and defend the constitution.

 

[Bush92]

California Proposition 8, the
Citizens of California...California mind you...wanted to preserve the sanctity of marriage and SCOTUS smashed them over the 14th Amendment. Get rid of that fucking thing. Radical Republicans of post Civil War were nut jobbers.

 

[Fenton Lum]

Sure mac, sure. They didn't even look at him.

Show me in the Constitution where they have to look at him, his record spoke for itself.

I'm sure you have an endless list of self rationalizations and I'll leave you to them, you'd be shatting yourself if the "other" party were engaged in this type of nonsense.

They have. Also I've been telling my senators to do this for years, Kagen and Sotomayor should have never been confirmed. Judges are supposed to apply the law and Constitution as written. It's not their job to find ways to uphold defective legislation, it's not their place to rewrite laws. Any judge that thinks that is their job should never be nominated for the high court.

Both are socialist political hacks.

They think they aren't bound by their oaths to support and defend the constitution.

This is america, no one's bound by anything. The constitution is like the bible, folks line up behind it to both hide behind and sodomize it simultaneously.

 

[Fenton Lum]

California Proposition 8, the
Citizens of California...California mind you...wanted to preserve the sanctity of marriage and SCOTUS smashed them over the 14th Amendment. Get rid of that fucking thing. Radical Republicans of post Civil War were nut jobbers.

No one's done anything at all to the sanctity of marriage.

 

[Bush92]

Show me in the Constitution where they have to look at him, his record spoke for itself.

I'm sure you have an endless list of self rationalizations and I'll leave you to them, you'd be shatting yourself if the "other" party were engaged in this type of nonsense.

They have. Also I've been telling my senators to do this for years, Kagen and Sotomayor should have never been confirmed. Judges are supposed to apply the law and Constitution as written. It's not their job to find ways to uphold defective legislation, it's not their place to rewrite laws. Any judge that thinks that is their job should never be nominated for the high court.

Both are socialist political hacks.

They think they aren't bound by their oaths to support and defend the constitution.

This is america, no one's bound by anything. The constitution is like the bible, folks line up behind it to both hide behind and sodomize it simultaneously.

You just exposed yourself as a gay activists. Never make the Constitution analogous to sodomy you perv.

 

[Bush92]

California Proposition 8, the
Citizens of California...California mind you...wanted to preserve the sanctity of marriage and SCOTUS smashed them over the 14th Amendment. Get rid of that fucking thing. Radical Republicans of post Civil War were nut jobbers.

No one's done anything at all to the sanctity of marriage.

Supreme Court has. Said that same sex couples can be officially married despite the wishes of people of the states. That's tyranny.

 

[Fenton Lum]

I'm sure you have an endless list of self rationalizations and I'll leave you to them, you'd be shatting yourself if the "other" party were engaged in this type of nonsense.

They have. Also I've been telling my senators to do this for years, Kagen and Sotomayor should have never been confirmed. Judges are supposed to apply the law and Constitution as written. It's not their job to find ways to uphold defective legislation, it's not their place to rewrite laws. Any judge that thinks that is their job should never be nominated for the high court.

Both are socialist political hacks.

They think they aren't bound by their oaths to support and defend the constitution.

This is america, no one's bound by anything. The constitution is like the bible, folks line up behind it to both hide behind and sodomize it simultaneously.

You just exposed yourself as a gay activists. Never make the Constitution analogous to sodomy you perv.

Man, the way some of you people come to "know" things.

 

[Fenton Lum]

California Proposition 8, the
Citizens of California...California mind you...wanted to preserve the sanctity of marriage and SCOTUS smashed them over the 14th Amendment. Get rid of that fucking thing. Radical Republicans of post Civil War were nut jobbers.

No one's done anything at all to the sanctity of marriage.

Supreme Court has. Said that same sex couples can be officially married despite the wishes of people of the states. That's tyranny.

If that's affected your marriage you had a very weak and unsustainable marriage. Own it.

 

[Bush92]

California Proposition 8, the
Citizens of California...California mind you...wanted to preserve the sanctity of marriage and SCOTUS smashed them over the 14th Amendment. Get rid of that fucking thing. Radical Republicans of post Civil War were nut jobbers.

No one's done anything at all to the sanctity of marriage.

Supreme Court has. Said that same sex couples can be officially married despite the wishes of people of the states. That's tyranny.

If that's affected your marriage you had a very weak and unsustainable marriage. Own it.

It affects my society of which I am a part of. It's not normal nor advantageous to allow this in a society that must maintain it's strong moral fabric in a competitive and dangerous world. Also...may I repeat...the "citizens" of California said YES to heterosexual unions.

 

[Fenton Lum]

California Proposition 8, the
Citizens of California...California mind you...wanted to preserve the sanctity of marriage and SCOTUS smashed them over the 14th Amendment. Get rid of that fucking thing. Radical Republicans of post Civil War were nut jobbers.

No one's done anything at all to the sanctity of marriage.

Supreme Court has. Said that same sex couples can be officially married despite the wishes of people of the states. That's tyranny.

If that's affected your marriage you had a very weak and unsustainable marriage. Own it.

It affects my society of which I am a part of. It's not normal nor advantageous to allow this in a society that must maintain it's strong moral fabric in a competitive and dangerous world. Also...may I repeat...the "citizens" of California said NO.

I reckon some a them may feel the same way about you.

 

[Bush92]

if you want to be gay that's fine. Just stay in the background with it.

 

[Bush92]

California Proposition 8, the
Citizens of California...California mind you...wanted to preserve the sanctity of marriage and SCOTUS smashed them over the 14th Amendment. Get rid of that fucking thing. Radical Republicans of post Civil War were nut jobbers.

No one's done anything at all to the sanctity of marriage.

Supreme Court has. Said that same sex couples can be officially married despite the wishes of people of the states. That's tyranny.

If that's affected your marriage you had a very weak and unsustainable marriage. Own it.

It affects my society of which I am a part of. It's not normal nor advantageous to allow this in a society that must maintain it's strong moral fabric in a competitive and dangerous world. Also...may I repeat...the "citizens" of California said NO.

I reckon some a them may feel the same way about you.

About me how? That my society backs my functional and moral position as a citizen?

 

[Correll]

If Hillary gets the next Justice, Disparate Impact Theory, which in practice requires anti-white discrimination, will become the law of the land, immediately.

 

[OKTexas]

Show me in the Constitution where they have to look at him, his record spoke for itself.

I'm sure you have an endless list of self rationalizations and I'll leave you to them, you'd be shatting yourself if the "other" party were engaged in this type of nonsense.

They have. Also I've been telling my senators to do this for years, Kagen and Sotomayor should have never been confirmed. Judges are supposed to apply the law and Constitution as written. It's not their job to find ways to uphold defective legislation, it's not their place to rewrite laws. Any judge that thinks that is their job should never be nominated for the high court.

Both are socialist political hacks.

They think they aren't bound by their oaths to support and defend the constitution.

This is america, no one's bound by anything. The constitution is like the bible, folks line up behind it to both hide behind and sodomize it simultaneously.

So why bother to put it in writing if everything is a mere suggestion? Hell why bother to have government at all? Let's just let everyone do their own thing.

 

[Fenton Lum]

No one's done anything at all to the sanctity of marriage.

Supreme Court has. Said that same sex couples can be officially married despite the wishes of people of the states. That's tyranny.

If that's affected your marriage you had a very weak and unsustainable marriage. Own it.

It affects my society of which I am a part of. It's not normal nor advantageous to allow this in a society that must maintain it's strong moral fabric in a competitive and dangerous world. Also...may I repeat...the "citizens" of California said NO.

I reckon some a them may feel the same way about you.

About me how? That my society backs my functional and moral position as a citizen?

Your society? See, there's your problem right there.

 

[Bush92]

If Hillary gets the next Justice, Disparate Impact Theory, which in practice requires anti-white discrimination, will become the law of the land, immediately.

Exactly. She hates and has hated her white suburban upbringing since her days at lesbian college.

 

[Fenton Lum]

I'm sure you have an endless list of self rationalizations and I'll leave you to them, you'd be shatting yourself if the "other" party were engaged in this type of nonsense.

They have. Also I've been telling my senators to do this for years, Kagen and Sotomayor should have never been confirmed. Judges are supposed to apply the law and Constitution as written. It's not their job to find ways to uphold defective legislation, it's not their place to rewrite laws. Any judge that thinks that is their job should never be nominated for the high court.

Both are socialist political hacks.

They think they aren't bound by their oaths to support and defend the constitution.

This is america, no one's bound by anything. The constitution is like the bible, folks line up behind it to both hide behind and sodomize it simultaneously.

So why bother to put it in writing if everything is a mere suggestion? Hell why bother to have government at all? Let's just let everyone do their own thing.

We pretty much are, look around pard.

 

[Fenton Lum]

If Hillary gets the next Justice, Disparate Impact Theory, which in practice requires anti-white discrimination, will become the law of the land, immediately.

Exactly. She hates and has hated her white suburban upbringing since her days at lesbian college.

Just think, if she'd married a woman you could discriminate more easily.

 

[Bush92]

Supreme Court has. Said that same sex couples can be officially married despite the wishes of people of the states. That's tyranny.

If that's affected your marriage you had a very weak and unsustainable marriage. Own it.

It affects my society of which I am a part of. It's not normal nor advantageous to allow this in a society that must maintain it's strong moral fabric in a competitive and dangerous world. Also...may I repeat...the "citizens" of California said NO.

I reckon some a them may feel the same way about you.

About me how? That my society backs my functional and moral position as a citizen?

Your society? See, there's your problem right there.

Excuse me? I have worn the uniform and fought for this country to defend her principles of Liberty. You want to have some Marxist social upheaval to justify your sexuality at the expense of the whole society and its values and mores.