Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Justices serve for life. The next Supreme Court Justice impact will be monumental. Who would you want as a Justice?
Donald Trump Releases 2nd List of Potential Supreme Court Justices, "Conservatives Should be Pleased" | LifeNews.com
Could possibly throw in the 24th as well. Elections are for the states to decide in terms of process.14th, 15th,16th, 23rd, and 26th, must all go.
Another strict constitutionalist I see.
Republicans lose the election and take their ball and go home
If WE do not get to select the Justice, then nobody can
POTUS nominates them. Do you want a socialist loose constructionist Justice? Or do want a strict constructionist Liberty minded individual for the High Court?Oh, we're going back to installing supreme court justices?
I want the senate to do it's fucking job for a change.
They did, they advised the president that they were withholding consent. He's free to nominate someone else.
Sure mac, sure. They didn't even look at him.
POTUS nominates them. Do you want a socialist loose constructionist Justice? Or do want a strict constructionist Liberty minded individual for the High Court?Oh, we're going back to installing supreme court justices?
I want the senate to do it's fucking job for a change.
They did, they advised the president that they were withholding consent. He's free to nominate someone else.
Sure mac, sure. They didn't even look at him.
Show me in the Constitution where they have to look at him, his record spoke for itself.
Thapar absolutely not. Don't need a damn Asian on there.
I like this guy here. He is black but he sounds a LOT like Scalia!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_P._Young_Jr.
Could possibly throw in the 24th as well. Elections are for the states to decide in terms of process.14th, 15th,16th, 23rd, and 26th, must all go.
Another strict constitutionalist I see.
There will never be another justice as conservative as ScaliaIf you vote Hillary for POTUS and republicans for Congress, there's no chance Hillary will even bother nominating anything left of Scalia. She knows they will be shut down in the Senate. Plus, Hillary's roots are in deep red Arkansas. People rebel when they're younger and then revert to their roots at they age. Trump was raised in New York City, the most liberal city in the East. Third in line behind San Francisco and West Hollywood.
So, know how people's minds are loyal as wisdom sets in; and vote accordingly. Between the two, for example (speaking of upcoming Court cases) only Donald Trump has come out in favor of letting deranged men into women's showers, locker rooms and restrooms. He has an official policy of this de facto violation of women even at Trump Tower. In fact, the most liberal Justice on the court, Ginsburg, even is to the right of Trump on this issue....
POTUS nominates them. Do you want a socialist loose constructionist Justice? Or do want a strict constructionist Liberty minded individual for the High Court?
I want the senate to do it's fucking job for a change.
They did, they advised the president that they were withholding consent. He's free to nominate someone else.
Sure mac, sure. They didn't even look at him.
Show me in the Constitution where they have to look at him, his record spoke for itself.
I'm sure you have an endless list of self rationalizations and I'll leave you to them, you'd be shatting yourself if the "other" party were engaged in this type of nonsense.
I want the senate to do it's fucking job for a change.
They did, they advised the president that they were withholding consent. He's free to nominate someone else.
Sure mac, sure. They didn't even look at him.
Show me in the Constitution where they have to look at him, his record spoke for itself.
I'm sure you have an endless list of self rationalizations and I'll leave you to them, you'd be shatting yourself if the "other" party were engaged in this type of nonsense.
They have. Also I've been telling my senators to do this for years, Kagen and Sotomayor should have never been confirmed. Judges are supposed to apply the law and Constitution as written. It's not their job to find ways to uphold defective legislation, it's not their place to rewrite laws. Any judge that thinks that is their job should never be nominated for the high court.
Both are socialist political hacks.I want the senate to do it's fucking job for a change.
They did, they advised the president that they were withholding consent. He's free to nominate someone else.
Sure mac, sure. They didn't even look at him.
Show me in the Constitution where they have to look at him, his record spoke for itself.
I'm sure you have an endless list of self rationalizations and I'll leave you to them, you'd be shatting yourself if the "other" party were engaged in this type of nonsense.
They have. Also I've been telling my senators to do this for years, Kagen and Sotomayor should have never been confirmed. Judges are supposed to apply the law and Constitution as written. It's not their job to find ways to uphold defective legislation, it's not their place to rewrite laws. Any judge that thinks that is their job should never be nominated for the high court.
Both are socialist political hacks.They did, they advised the president that they were withholding consent. He's free to nominate someone else.
Sure mac, sure. They didn't even look at him.
Show me in the Constitution where they have to look at him, his record spoke for itself.
I'm sure you have an endless list of self rationalizations and I'll leave you to them, you'd be shatting yourself if the "other" party were engaged in this type of nonsense.
They have. Also I've been telling my senators to do this for years, Kagen and Sotomayor should have never been confirmed. Judges are supposed to apply the law and Constitution as written. It's not their job to find ways to uphold defective legislation, it's not their place to rewrite laws. Any judge that thinks that is their job should never be nominated for the high court.
Judicial activism is Roe v. Wade, Obamacare, and same sex marraige rulings. Don't even get me going on Vitale case or Abington v. Schemmp case.They did, they advised the president that they were withholding consent. He's free to nominate someone else.
Sure mac, sure. They didn't even look at him.
Show me in the Constitution where they have to look at him, his record spoke for itself.
I'm sure you have an endless list of self rationalizations and I'll leave you to them, you'd be shatting yourself if the "other" party were engaged in this type of nonsense.
They have. Also I've been telling my senators to do this for years, Kagen and Sotomayor should have never been confirmed. Judges are supposed to apply the law and Constitution as written. It's not their job to find ways to uphold defective legislation, it's not their place to rewrite laws. Any judge that thinks that is their job should never be nominated for the high court.
Funny thing, that "judicial activism", it's always on the "other" side.
Judicial activism is Roe v. Wade, Obamacare, and same sex marraige rulings. Don't even get me going on Vitale case or Abington v. Schempf case.Sure mac, sure. They didn't even look at him.
Show me in the Constitution where they have to look at him, his record spoke for itself.
I'm sure you have an endless list of self rationalizations and I'll leave you to them, you'd be shatting yourself if the "other" party were engaged in this type of nonsense.
They have. Also I've been telling my senators to do this for years, Kagen and Sotomayor should have never been confirmed. Judges are supposed to apply the law and Constitution as written. It's not their job to find ways to uphold defective legislation, it's not their place to rewrite laws. Any judge that thinks that is their job should never be nominated for the high court.
Funny thing, that "judicial activism", it's always on the "other" side.
They did, they advised the president that they were withholding consent. He's free to nominate someone else.
Sure mac, sure. They didn't even look at him.
Show me in the Constitution where they have to look at him, his record spoke for itself.
I'm sure you have an endless list of self rationalizations and I'll leave you to them, you'd be shatting yourself if the "other" party were engaged in this type of nonsense.
They have. Also I've been telling my senators to do this for years, Kagen and Sotomayor should have never been confirmed. Judges are supposed to apply the law and Constitution as written. It's not their job to find ways to uphold defective legislation, it's not their place to rewrite laws. Any judge that thinks that is their job should never be nominated for the high court.
Funny thing, that "judicial activism", it's always on the "other" side.