Supreme Court Nominee...Biggest Issue 2016

[Bush92]

14th, 15th,16th, 23rd, and 26th, must all go.

Another strict constitutionalist I see.

Could possibly throw in the 24th as well. Elections are for the states to decide in terms of process.

 

[BuckToothMoron]

Justices serve for life. The next Supreme Court Justice impact will be monumental. Who would you want as a Justice?
Donald Trump Releases 2nd List of Potential Supreme Court Justices, "Conservatives Should be Pleased" | LifeNews.com

I couldn't agree more. Behind all the shortcomings of either canidate lurks the one issue that both sides should be focused on, and The clown has done a poor job in relating the importance of this issue. He should be talking it up at every opportunity. It is the only issue that will cement his base.

 

[Fenton Lum]

14th, 15th,16th, 23rd, and 26th, must all go.

Another strict constitutionalist I see.

Could possibly throw in the 24th as well. Elections are for the states to decide in terms of process.

Yeah, shred it.

 

[BuckToothMoron]

Republicans lose the election and take their ball and go home

If WE do not get to select the Justice, then nobody can

Hey rightwinger- just so you know, if somehow Trump wins we all know you will declare he is not a Republican, and therefore your little tag line will still be valid in your own little mind. But if a miracle does occur, and he is sworn in as POTUS, know that he will be selecting justices of a conservative persuasion.

 

[Preacher]

Canady sounds good. He is the one that termed what we now call partial birth abortion...he is really pro life..I like him.

 

[Preacher]

Tymkovich voted with the majority in support of Hobby Lobby before it went to the SC.

 

[OKTexas]

Oh, we're going back to installing supreme court justices?

POTUS nominates them. Do you want a socialist loose constructionist Justice? Or do want a strict constructionist Liberty minded individual for the High Court?

I want the senate to do it's fucking job for a change.

They did, they advised the president that they were withholding consent. He's free to nominate someone else.

Sure mac, sure. They didn't even look at him.

Show me in the Constitution where they have to look at him, his record spoke for itself.

 

[Fenton Lum]

Oh, we're going back to installing supreme court justices?

POTUS nominates them. Do you want a socialist loose constructionist Justice? Or do want a strict constructionist Liberty minded individual for the High Court?

I want the senate to do it's fucking job for a change.

They did, they advised the president that they were withholding consent. He's free to nominate someone else.

Sure mac, sure. They didn't even look at him.

Show me in the Constitution where they have to look at him, his record spoke for itself.

I'm sure you have an endless list of self rationalizations and I'll leave you to them, you'd be shatting yourself if the "other" party were engaged in this type of nonsense.

 

[Preacher]

Thapar absolutely not. Don't need a damn Asian on there.

I like this guy here. He is black but he sounds a LOT like Scalia!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_P._Young_Jr.

 

[Fenton Lum]

Thapar absolutely not. Don't need a damn Asian on there.

I like this guy here. He is black but he sounds a LOT like Scalia!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_P._Young_Jr.

Yeah, no fucking asians, the Aryans are resolute in that.

 

[Fenton Lum]

14th, 15th,16th, 23rd, and 26th, must all go.

Another strict constitutionalist I see.

Could possibly throw in the 24th as well. Elections are for the states to decide in terms of process.

A strict constitutionalist who wants to shred the constitution, man, ya can't make that shyte up.

 

[Silhouette]

If you vote Hillary for POTUS and republicans for Congress, there's no chance Hillary will even bother nominating anything left of Scalia. She knows they will be shut down in the Senate. Plus, Hillary's roots are in deep red Arkansas. People rebel when they're younger and then revert to their roots at they age. Trump was raised in New York City, the most liberal city in the East. Third in line behind San Francisco and West Hollywood.

So, know how people's minds are loyal as wisdom sets in; and vote accordingly. Between the two, for example (speaking of upcoming Court cases) only Donald Trump has come out in favor of letting deranged men into women's showers, locker rooms and restrooms. He has an official policy of this de facto violation of women even at Trump Tower. In fact, the most liberal Justice on the court, Ginsburg, even is to the right of Trump on this issue....

 

[rightwinger]

If you vote Hillary for POTUS and republicans for Congress, there's no chance Hillary will even bother nominating anything left of Scalia. She knows they will be shut down in the Senate. Plus, Hillary's roots are in deep red Arkansas. People rebel when they're younger and then revert to their roots at they age. Trump was raised in New York City, the most liberal city in the East. Third in line behind San Francisco and West Hollywood.

So, know how people's minds are loyal as wisdom sets in; and vote accordingly. Between the two, for example (speaking of upcoming Court cases) only Donald Trump has come out in favor of letting deranged men into women's showers, locker rooms and restrooms. He has an official policy of this de facto violation of women even at Trump Tower. In fact, the most liberal Justice on the court, Ginsburg, even is to the right of Trump on this issue....

There will never be another justice as conservative as Scalia

 

[OKTexas]

POTUS nominates them. Do you want a socialist loose constructionist Justice? Or do want a strict constructionist Liberty minded individual for the High Court?

I want the senate to do it's fucking job for a change.

They did, they advised the president that they were withholding consent. He's free to nominate someone else.

Sure mac, sure. They didn't even look at him.

Show me in the Constitution where they have to look at him, his record spoke for itself.

I'm sure you have an endless list of self rationalizations and I'll leave you to them, you'd be shatting yourself if the "other" party were engaged in this type of nonsense.

They have. Also I've been telling my senators to do this for years, Kagen and Sotomayor should have never been confirmed. Judges are supposed to apply the law and Constitution as written. It's not their job to find ways to uphold defective legislation, it's not their place to rewrite laws. Any judge that thinks that is their job should never be nominated for the high court.

 

[Fenton Lum]

I want the senate to do it's fucking job for a change.

They did, they advised the president that they were withholding consent. He's free to nominate someone else.

Sure mac, sure. They didn't even look at him.

Show me in the Constitution where they have to look at him, his record spoke for itself.

I'm sure you have an endless list of self rationalizations and I'll leave you to them, you'd be shatting yourself if the "other" party were engaged in this type of nonsense.

They have. Also I've been telling my senators to do this for years, Kagen and Sotomayor should have never been confirmed. Judges are supposed to apply the law and Constitution as written. It's not their job to find ways to uphold defective legislation, it's not their place to rewrite laws. Any judge that thinks that is their job should never be nominated for the high court.

Funny thing, that "judicial activism", it's always on the "other" side.

 

[Bush92]

I want the senate to do it's fucking job for a change.

They did, they advised the president that they were withholding consent. He's free to nominate someone else.

Sure mac, sure. They didn't even look at him.

Show me in the Constitution where they have to look at him, his record spoke for itself.

I'm sure you have an endless list of self rationalizations and I'll leave you to them, you'd be shatting yourself if the "other" party were engaged in this type of nonsense.

They have. Also I've been telling my senators to do this for years, Kagen and Sotomayor should have never been confirmed. Judges are supposed to apply the law and Constitution as written. It's not their job to find ways to uphold defective legislation, it's not their place to rewrite laws. Any judge that thinks that is their job should never be nominated for the high court.

Both are socialist political hacks.

 

[Fenton Lum]

They did, they advised the president that they were withholding consent. He's free to nominate someone else.

Sure mac, sure. They didn't even look at him.

Show me in the Constitution where they have to look at him, his record spoke for itself.

I'm sure you have an endless list of self rationalizations and I'll leave you to them, you'd be shatting yourself if the "other" party were engaged in this type of nonsense.

They have. Also I've been telling my senators to do this for years, Kagen and Sotomayor should have never been confirmed. Judges are supposed to apply the law and Constitution as written. It's not their job to find ways to uphold defective legislation, it's not their place to rewrite laws. Any judge that thinks that is their job should never be nominated for the high court.

Both are socialist political hacks.

You people have no idea what socialism or communism is, and your entire political system is hackery, c'mon, embrace reality.

 

[Bush92]

They did, they advised the president that they were withholding consent. He's free to nominate someone else.

Sure mac, sure. They didn't even look at him.

Show me in the Constitution where they have to look at him, his record spoke for itself.

I'm sure you have an endless list of self rationalizations and I'll leave you to them, you'd be shatting yourself if the "other" party were engaged in this type of nonsense.

They have. Also I've been telling my senators to do this for years, Kagen and Sotomayor should have never been confirmed. Judges are supposed to apply the law and Constitution as written. It's not their job to find ways to uphold defective legislation, it's not their place to rewrite laws. Any judge that thinks that is their job should never be nominated for the high court.

Funny thing, that "judicial activism", it's always on the "other" side.

Judicial activism is Roe v. Wade, Obamacare, and same sex marraige rulings. Don't even get me going on Vitale case or Abington v. Schemmp case.

 

[Fenton Lum]

Sure mac, sure. They didn't even look at him.

Show me in the Constitution where they have to look at him, his record spoke for itself.

I'm sure you have an endless list of self rationalizations and I'll leave you to them, you'd be shatting yourself if the "other" party were engaged in this type of nonsense.

They have. Also I've been telling my senators to do this for years, Kagen and Sotomayor should have never been confirmed. Judges are supposed to apply the law and Constitution as written. It's not their job to find ways to uphold defective legislation, it's not their place to rewrite laws. Any judge that thinks that is their job should never be nominated for the high court.

Funny thing, that "judicial activism", it's always on the "other" side.

Judicial activism is Roe v. Wade, Obamacare, and same sex marraige rulings. Don't even get me going on Vitale case or Abington v. Schempf case.

Like I said.

 

[OKTexas]

They did, they advised the president that they were withholding consent. He's free to nominate someone else.

Sure mac, sure. They didn't even look at him.

Show me in the Constitution where they have to look at him, his record spoke for itself.

I'm sure you have an endless list of self rationalizations and I'll leave you to them, you'd be shatting yourself if the "other" party were engaged in this type of nonsense.

They have. Also I've been telling my senators to do this for years, Kagen and Sotomayor should have never been confirmed. Judges are supposed to apply the law and Constitution as written. It's not their job to find ways to uphold defective legislation, it's not their place to rewrite laws. Any judge that thinks that is their job should never be nominated for the high court.

Funny thing, that "judicial activism", it's always on the "other" side.

Yeah, except when the person criticizes equally. If I think a judge gets it wrong, I will say so no matter who it is. Even Scalia didn't always get it right, usually in cases dealing with the interstate commerce clause.