Supreme Court election has ripples across Wisconsin

[C_Clayton_Jones]

‘We now know the two candidates vying for a seat on Wisconsin's high court, and the impact of the election is being felt across the badger state.

Following the nonpartisan primary, both Dan Kelley and Janet Protasiewicz advanced to April's general election, an election that could affect everything from abortion, to redistricting.

John Blakeman, a political science professor at UWSP, said, "It's a different type of political climate, where this election is going to be even more partisan that the last two Supreme Court elections."’

Supreme Court election has ripples across Wisconsin

WISCONSIN -- (WAOW) We now know the two candidates vying for a seat on Wisconsin's high court, and the impact of the election is being felt across the badger state.

www.waow.com

And the wars within the states continue.

 

[pknopp]

Putting faith in politics. LOL

 

[Blaster]

‘We now know the two candidates vying for a seat on Wisconsin's high court, and the impact of the election is being felt across the badger state.

Following the nonpartisan primary, both Dan Kelley and Janet Protasiewicz advanced to April's general election, an election that could affect everything from abortion, to redistricting.

John Blakeman, a political science professor at UWSP, said, "It's a different type of political climate, where this election is going to be even more partisan that the last two Supreme Court elections."’

Supreme Court election has ripples across Wisconsin

WISCONSIN -- (WAOW) We now know the two candidates vying for a seat on Wisconsin's high court, and the impact of the election is being felt across the badger state.

www.waow.com

And the wars within the states continue.

Lots of attack ads against the conservative running for the court. How shameful.

 

[Dreadnaught1968]

The dims are bombarding the airwaves with their ads. Apparently going all-out to buy this one...

 

[gfm7175]

Yup. I live here and all I see are ads about how much of an "extremist" Kelly is... because protecting children is apparently an "extremist" thing to do nowadays... but murdering children is "all good and dandy"... hmmmmmmm...

Black is white.
Up is down.
Left is right.
Dogs are cats.
Boys are girls.
Good is evil.
Evil is good.
Violence is mostly peaceful protest.
Peaceful protest is violence.
Forced masks and jabs is bodily autonomy.
Murder is healthcare.

Liberals are fudgepackin' NUTS.


I suspect there will be a (s)election rather than an election once again... "Can't have Kelly back on the court... he's a constitutional conservative... no no no... we need a lawless libtard instead"

 

[otto105]

Lots of attack ads against the conservative running for the court. How shameful.

All true fact ads.

 

[otto105]

The dims are bombarding the airwaves with their ads. Apparently going all-out to buy this one...

I thought money in politics was free speech…now wingnut fuckup doesn’t like speech?

 

[Dreadnaught1968]

I thought money in politics was free speech…now wingnut fuckup doesn’t like speech?

So you're OK with buying court seat?

 

[Blaster]

Judges were once thought to be impartial but are just as sleazy as politicians.

 

[otto105]

So you're OK with buying court seat?

Citizens united is thing isn't it.

Have you asked dick uelien about trying to buy a court seat?

 

[otto105]

Judges were once thought to be impartial but are just as sleazy as politicians.

Yeah, see our supreme court.

 

[otto105]

What would someone think of a person who compares Social Security to slavery?

 

[Frankeneinstein]

What would someone think of a person who compares Social Security to slavery?

That they drank too much of the "tax cuts are racist" Kool-Aid

 

[CarsomyrPlusSix]

Yeah, see our supreme court.

Yeah, that **** moron Sotomayor is as sleazy as they come…

 

[Blaster]

Yeah, see our supreme court.

SCOTUS has ruled for both conservatives and liberals.

 

[otto105]

SCOTUS has ruled for both conservatives and liberals.

Not the current court. It rules for conservatives and uses a shadow docket to further reaffirm their bias.

 

[otto105]

All true fact ads.

Sure, one ad asserts that dan kelly would uphold the 1849 abortion law in WI.

Prove that wrong.

 

[Blaster]

Not the current court. It rules for conservatives and uses a shadow docket to further reaffirm their bias.

Not true.

 

[CarsomyrPlusSix]

Sure, one ad asserts that dan kelly would uphold the 1849 abortion law in WI.

Prove that wrong.

Why prove that wrong? It’s probably great unless that law is too lenient, in which case it’s still better than nothing.

Was that law in place when Roe happened? If so, that law is still valid and always was, Roe was garbage.

 

[otto105]

Not true.

They used the shadow docket in regard to the texas abortion law before they overturned Roe.

Proof me wrong.