Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
*Taking hold of your chubby little hand while bringing out the crayons*Says the retarded apologist for Republican branded Keynesianism.It tells me that you're a retard in denial of reality... for "political reasons."Do Republicans support agriculture industry subsidies? YES.
some do for political reasons but generally Republicans are far more conservative than Democrats and so don't support them. But don't forget political reasons matter since elections are decided by the flip floping independents.
A child would know this yet it has to be explained to you. What does that tell you?
some [Republicans support ag. subsidies] for political reasons but generally Republicans are far more conservative than Democrats and so don't support them. But don't forget political reasons matter since elections are decided by the flip floping independents.
dear, what is Republican branded keynesianism????
can the the idiot liberal present his best example???"Republican branded Keynesianism" is Keynesian economics specially formulated and presented for the consumption of myopic retards whose thoughts are informed exclusively by Republican party dogma.
.
I have no idea who you think you're addressing Pumpkin, but I already presented a handful of serviceable examples for you.EdwardBaiamonte, post: 10960806, member: 34008"]can the the idiot liberal present his best example???"Republican branded Keynesianism" is Keynesian economics specially formulated and presented for the consumption of myopic retards whose thoughts are informed exclusively by Republican party dogma.
but I already presented a handful of serviceable examples for you.
--they think "trickle down" economics is supply-side economics,.
Troubled Asset Relief Programbut I already presented a handful of serviceable examples for you.
dear we are not asking for a handful but rather the best example to clarify what you are talking about. How will you learn if you are afriad to try??
Troubled Asset Relief Programbut I already presented a handful of serviceable examples for you.
dear we are not asking for a handful but rather the best example to clarify what you are talking about. How will you learn if you are afriad to try??
Supply-side economics acknowledges the reality that demand is meaningless and impotent (and potentially destructive) in the face of scarcity. While demand is inherent to all economies, the presence of valuable goods and services is not. Supply makes demand meaningful. Barriers to creating "supply" undermines the function of "demand" in an economy.--they think "trickle down" economics is supply-side economics,.
if not explain why not or admit with your silence or attempts to change subject that as a typical liberal you lack the IQ to defend what you assert.
Everything.Troubled Asset Relief Programbut I already presented a handful of serviceable examples for you.
dear we are not asking for a handful but rather the best example to clarify what you are talking about. How will you learn if you are afriad to try??
dear, what about it?????
Supply-side economics acknowledges the reality that demand is meaningless and impotent (and potentially destructive) in the face of scarcity..
Trickle-down economics is wealth redistribution to the already wealthy;.
that afterward, this redistributed wealth would show up broadly distributed,.
That's what I said, retard.Supply-side economics acknowledges the reality that demand is meaningless and impotent (and potentially destructive) in the face of scarcity..
100% stupidity. there is always scarcity. People always demand more food clothing and shelter than they can afford because resources are scarce an demand is unlimited.
I did not say otherwise, retard.Trickle-down economics is wealth redistribution to the already wealthy;.
100% stupid! the people to whom the iphone trickled down to were not already wealthy, but Jobs was already wealthy.
trickle down presumes that supplying wealth to create a glut of "investment opportunities" is something other than stimulating a demand for products of questionable, and loosely vetted value.
I did not say otherwise, retard.Trickle-down economics is wealth redistribution to the already wealthy;.
100% stupid! the people to whom the iphone trickled down to were not already wealthy, but Jobs was already wealthy.
Oh. Steve was the beneficiary of wealth collected at gunpoint by the government? That's retarded delusion you're coming from?that afterward, this redistributed wealth would show up broadly distributed,.
of course it would you perfect and total idiotic liberal. For Steve Jobs to end up with $15 billion he had to broadly distribute $400 billion in iphone wealth.
Do you understand now??
That's what I said, retard.Supply-side economics acknowledges the reality that demand is meaningless and impotent (and potentially destructive) in the face of scarcity..
100% stupidity. there is always scarcity. People always demand more food clothing and shelter than they can afford because resources are scarce an demand is unlimited.
. Steve was the beneficiary of wealth collected at gunpoint by the government?
I've made no claim to the contrary, you brainless cretin.trickle down presumes that supplying wealth to create a glut of "investment opportunities" is something other than stimulating a demand for products of questionable, and loosely vetted value.
1) capitalism does not supply wealth to the rich it lets them keep their wealth or private property
I do, you're wrong, and retarded.2) demand for products of little value can't be purchased unless you expand the money supply. Do you know the differene between monetary policy and fiscal policy.
