- Thread starter
- #61
"Why capitalism has nothing to do with supply and demand"100% stupidity. there is always scarcity. People always demand more food clothing and shelter than they can afford because resources are scarce an demand is unlimited
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
"Why capitalism has nothing to do with supply and demand"100% stupidity. there is always scarcity. People always demand more food clothing and shelter than they can afford because resources are scarce an demand is unlimited
No, there isn't.That's what I said, retard.Supply-side economics acknowledges the reality that demand is meaningless and impotent (and potentially destructive) in the face of scarcity..
100% stupidity. there is always scarcity. People always demand more food clothing and shelter than they can afford because resources are scarce an demand is unlimited.
And it is.no dear you said demand is meaningless in the face of scarcity.
That would mean demand was always meaningless since there is always scarcity
I've made no claim to the contrary, you brainless cretin.
trickle down presumes that supplying wealth to create a glut of "investment opportunities"
I never said otherwise, you fatuous sense embargo. Steve was the beneficiary of wealth collected at gunpoint by the government?
His wealth came from selling iphones!!!!
Yes. You lack the brain power to speak and sit at the same time.See why we say slow??
And it is.no dear you said demand is meaningless in the face of scarcity.
I never said otherwise, you fatuous sense embargo. Steve was the beneficiary of wealth collected at gunpoint by the government?
His wealth came from selling iphones!!!!
Yes. You lack the brain power to speak and sit at the same time.See why we say slow??
And it is.no dear you said demand is meaningless in the face of scarcity.
.
l never had a problem with supply-side economics, idiot.I never said otherwise, you fatuous sense embargo. Steve was the beneficiary of wealth collected at gunpoint by the government?
His wealth came from selling iphones!!!!
Yes. You lack the brain power to speak and sit at the same time.See why we say slow??
so now you support supply side economics??
l never had a problem with supply-side economics, idiot.I never said otherwise, you fatuous sense embargo. Steve was the beneficiary of wealth collected at gunpoint by the government?
His wealth came from selling iphones!!!!
Yes. You lack the brain power to speak and sit at the same time.See why we say slow??
so now you support supply side economics??
Trickle-down economics is not supply-side economics; it's Keynesian economics branded for Republicans whose thoughts are informed solely by party dogma.l never had a problem with supply-side economics, idiot.I never said otherwise, you fatuous sense embargo. Steve was the beneficiary of wealth collected at gunpoint by the government?
His wealth came from selling iphones!!!!
Yes. You lack the brain power to speak and sit at the same time.See why we say slow??
so now you support supply side economics??
oh so you just write unintelligble gibberish?
this is support for supply side economics: ???
Trickle-down economics is wealth redistribution to the already wealthy;.
Pitchforks!!!how is that possible???
]Trickle-down economics is not supply-side economics;.
Pitchforks!!!how is that possible???
"If we don’t do something to fix the glaring inequities in this economy, the pitchforks are going to come for us. No society can sustain this kind of rising inequality. In fact, there is no example in human history where wealth accumulated like this and the pitchforks didn’t eventually come out. You show me a highly unequal society, and I will show you a police state. Or an uprising. There are no counterexamples. None. It’s not if, it’s when."
Read more: The Pitchforks Are Coming For Us Plutocrats - Nick Hanauer - POLITICO Magazine
Bailouts, but also special tax exemptions, subsidies, exclusive low interest loans, and exclusive access to resources at below market rates, to name but a handful.I've made no claim to the contrary, you brainless cretin.
trickle down presumes that supplying wealth to create a glut of "investment opportunities"
so how is the wealth supplied to create a glut of investment opportunities??
I've made the distinction clear to you twice, retard.]Trickle-down economics is not supply-side economics;.
whats the difference?
Bailouts,l.I've made no claim to the contrary, you brainless cretin.
trickle down presumes that supplying wealth to create a glut of "investment opportunities"
so how is the wealth supplied to create a glut of investment opportunities??
I've made the distinction clear to you twice, retard.]Trickle-down economics is not supply-side economics;.
whats the difference?
You ever hear of TARP?Bailouts,l.I've made no claim to the contrary, you brainless cretin.
trickle down presumes that supplying wealth to create a glut of "investment opportunities"
so how is the wealth supplied to create a glut of investment opportunities??
what bailouts???
I've made the distinction clear to you twice, retard.]Trickle-down economics is not supply-side economics;.
whats the difference?
can you say what difference is between supply side and trickle down