EMH
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2021
- 14,205
- 9,776
- 2,138
In short, we have clear truth here, buried by trolls trying to shout it down.
We have two and only two measures of atmospheric temps, satellites and balloons, and both showed no warming in the atmosphere despite rising CO2 before crick's taxpayer funded heroes fudged both to keep the Co2 fraud going...
Their theory is that increasing Co2 in the atmosphere would warm the atmosphere
THEORY REJECTED
We have absolutely no breakout in cane activity, which would occur if oceans were actually warming.
We have no visual evidence of a single landmark on Earth "sinking" due to ocean "rise" because oceans are not rising because Antarctica is not melting at all, but rather gaining ice.
We have a planet where EVERY SINGLE PIECE OF LAND WITHIN 600 miles of a pole is in continent specific ICE AGE, and every piece of land outside of 600 miles of a pole is not, and land moves.
We have one Earth polar circle, the Antarctic, with 90% of Earth ice, surface temps 50F colder than Arctic, and puts 9 times the ice that the Arctic puts in the oceans. In short, one Earth polar circle cools Earth much more than the other. All about land near the pole. Two polar oceans and Earth has no ice. That is the driver of Earth climate change.
We have the Co2 Fraud supporters here completely unable to explain how in the past 1 million years Co2 froze Greenland and melted North America AT THE SAME TIME because it did not and ATMOSPHERE is ruled out as a cause of either... The cause is that Greenland recently moved into the "within 600 miles" to the Pole zone and NA moved out (except for Ellesmere)
In short, Co2 does ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.
Earth climate change is 99%+ about WHERE LAND IS, and LAND MOVES, and we could increase atmospheric Co2 10 fold from current levels and
IT WOULD STILL DO NOTHING
We have two and only two measures of atmospheric temps, satellites and balloons, and both showed no warming in the atmosphere despite rising CO2 before crick's taxpayer funded heroes fudged both to keep the Co2 fraud going...
Key claim against global warming evaporates
Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.
www.nbcnews.com
Their theory is that increasing Co2 in the atmosphere would warm the atmosphere
THEORY REJECTED
We have absolutely no breakout in cane activity, which would occur if oceans were actually warming.
We have no visual evidence of a single landmark on Earth "sinking" due to ocean "rise" because oceans are not rising because Antarctica is not melting at all, but rather gaining ice.
We have a planet where EVERY SINGLE PIECE OF LAND WITHIN 600 miles of a pole is in continent specific ICE AGE, and every piece of land outside of 600 miles of a pole is not, and land moves.
We have one Earth polar circle, the Antarctic, with 90% of Earth ice, surface temps 50F colder than Arctic, and puts 9 times the ice that the Arctic puts in the oceans. In short, one Earth polar circle cools Earth much more than the other. All about land near the pole. Two polar oceans and Earth has no ice. That is the driver of Earth climate change.
We have the Co2 Fraud supporters here completely unable to explain how in the past 1 million years Co2 froze Greenland and melted North America AT THE SAME TIME because it did not and ATMOSPHERE is ruled out as a cause of either... The cause is that Greenland recently moved into the "within 600 miles" to the Pole zone and NA moved out (except for Ellesmere)
In short, Co2 does ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.
Earth climate change is 99%+ about WHERE LAND IS, and LAND MOVES, and we could increase atmospheric Co2 10 fold from current levels and
IT WOULD STILL DO NOTHING