Stupid Bastard Announces Begining Of Shooting War With Iran

[Dr Grump]

Uh huh. I'm sure that fantasy amuses you.

Sometimes.

 

[Dr Grump]

If a military ship from ANY country came into our waters and got within 3 miles that would be the reaction. They would radio them that they are in territorial waters, and to leave. They would also get several warnings. Only when the warnings fail, or they fire first, would we fire on them. Sorry, but I spent 20 years in the Navy, and I've seen how things are handled.

I know you were in the navy. At the end of the day, do you think you should have gone to war with Iran over those sailors being held for 15 hours like these guys do. There are also other geopolitical things in play here. Iran is a very different regime from the US. Also the Arabian Gulf, Red Sea, Straits of Hormuz are a lot more volatile places than the coasts of the US. So what was the end game for those wishing for Washington (ie Obama at the time)? Bomb Tehran, which would have been a death sentence for those soldiers? Wait until the soldiers were freed then bomb (just like Ronnie Raygun did with the Iran hostages in 1980 - oh, that's right he didn't). I mean what are the neocon whackadoodles advocating in terms of outcome for this incident (I know you're not one of them, just asking a rhetorical question).

What civilized people inhabit this area that it's so volatile ?

what has that got to do with anything...

 

[miketx]

His insane antics used to be funny. He’s let the vermin take over for the warmongers.View attachment 326570

So, liar, where's all the shooting?

 

[Indeependent]

If a military ship from ANY country came into our waters and got within 3 miles that would be the reaction. They would radio them that they are in territorial waters, and to leave. They would also get several warnings. Only when the warnings fail, or they fire first, would we fire on them. Sorry, but I spent 20 years in the Navy, and I've seen how things are handled.

I know you were in the navy. At the end of the day, do you think you should have gone to war with Iran over those sailors being held for 15 hours like these guys do. There are also other geopolitical things in play here. Iran is a very different regime from the US. Also the Arabian Gulf, Red Sea, Straits of Hormuz are a lot more volatile places than the coasts of the US. So what was the end game for those wishing for Washington (ie Obama at the time)? Bomb Tehran, which would have been a death sentence for those soldiers? Wait until the soldiers were freed then bomb (just like Ronnie Raygun did with the Iran hostages in 1980 - oh, that's right he didn't). I mean what are the neocon whackadoodles advocating in terms of outcome for this incident (I know you're not one of them, just asking a rhetorical question).

What civilized people inhabit this area that it's so volatile ?

what has that got to do with anything...

You made a statement about a region other than the evil US.
You re always suggesting that everyone outside the US is the Ivory Snow baby.
I want to know why this region is so volatile if only the US is the world's aggressor.

 

[Dr Grump]

If a military ship from ANY country came into our waters and got within 3 miles that would be the reaction. They would radio them that they are in territorial waters, and to leave. They would also get several warnings. Only when the warnings fail, or they fire first, would we fire on them. Sorry, but I spent 20 years in the Navy, and I've seen how things are handled.

I know you were in the navy. At the end of the day, do you think you should have gone to war with Iran over those sailors being held for 15 hours like these guys do. There are also other geopolitical things in play here. Iran is a very different regime from the US. Also the Arabian Gulf, Red Sea, Straits of Hormuz are a lot more volatile places than the coasts of the US. So what was the end game for those wishing for Washington (ie Obama at the time)? Bomb Tehran, which would have been a death sentence for those soldiers? Wait until the soldiers were freed then bomb (just like Ronnie Raygun did with the Iran hostages in 1980 - oh, that's right he didn't). I mean what are the neocon whackadoodles advocating in terms of outcome for this incident (I know you're not one of them, just asking a rhetorical question).

What civilized people inhabit this area that it's so volatile ?

what has that got to do with anything...

You made a statement about a region other than the evil US.
You re always suggesting that everyone outside the US is the Ivory Snow baby.
I want to know why this region is so volatile if only the US is the world's aggressor.

1) True I did make a statement about the US
2) I have never suggested in one single post over 14 years on this board that everyone outside the US is an Ivory Snow baby
3) The US can be an aggressor. So can a lot of other nations - Russia, Iran, China and North Korea come to mind.

Just because I don't lick your balls and say that the US is the greatest country on Earth doesn't mean it's a bad place. Lots to like about the US.

 

[Indeependent]

If a military ship from ANY country came into our waters and got within 3 miles that would be the reaction. They would radio them that they are in territorial waters, and to leave. They would also get several warnings. Only when the warnings fail, or they fire first, would we fire on them. Sorry, but I spent 20 years in the Navy, and I've seen how things are handled.

I know you were in the navy. At the end of the day, do you think you should have gone to war with Iran over those sailors being held for 15 hours like these guys do. There are also other geopolitical things in play here. Iran is a very different regime from the US. Also the Arabian Gulf, Red Sea, Straits of Hormuz are a lot more volatile places than the coasts of the US. So what was the end game for those wishing for Washington (ie Obama at the time)? Bomb Tehran, which would have been a death sentence for those soldiers? Wait until the soldiers were freed then bomb (just like Ronnie Raygun did with the Iran hostages in 1980 - oh, that's right he didn't). I mean what are the neocon whackadoodles advocating in terms of outcome for this incident (I know you're not one of them, just asking a rhetorical question).

What civilized people inhabit this area that it's so volatile ?

what has that got to do with anything...

You made a statement about a region other than the evil US.
You re always suggesting that everyone outside the US is the Ivory Snow baby.
I want to know why this region is so volatile if only the US is the world's aggressor.

1) True I did make a statement about the US
2) I have never suggested in one single post over 14 years on this board that everyone outside the US is an Ivory Snow baby
3) The US can be an aggressor. So can a lot of other nations - Russia, Iran, China and North Korea come to mind.

Just because I don't lick your balls and say that the US is the greatest country on Earth doesn't mean it's a bad place. Lots to like about the US.

So the issue is, why is this region so volatile?
Is it vying for valuable resources?
Is it religion?
Is it both?

 

[Dr Grump]

So the issue is, why is this region so volatile?
Is it vying for valuable resources?
Is it religion?
Is it both?

Religion, resources, history. It's a basketcase
.

 

[Indeependent]

So the issue is, why is this region so volatile?
Is it vying for valuable resources?
Is it religion?
Is it both?

Religion, resources, history. It's a basketcase
.

Oh, God..I was afraid of that.

 

[Dr Grump]

So the issue is, why is this region so volatile?
Is it vying for valuable resources?
Is it religion?
Is it both?

Religion, resources, history. It's a basketcase
.

Oh, God..I was afraid of that.

what? agreement?

 

[Indeependent]

So the issue is, why is this region so volatile?
Is it vying for valuable resources?
Is it religion?
Is it both?

Religion, resources, history. It's a basketcase
.

Oh, God..I was afraid of that.

what? agreement?

It's scary that a region rich in resources is surrounded by nations willing to fight.

I deal with facts, not ideology.
God doesn't look too well upon ideologues.

 

[Nostra]

Have we lit up any Ragheads in innertubes yet?

I WANT MY WWIII!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[daveman]

Naaah, I'm here to have fun. There's no way in hell I'm going to change your mind. You bitterly cling to your horseshit too tightly.

Course you're having fun. Is that why your posts are full of piss and vitriol...
Bitter? Ha!! There are many adjectives you could use to describe me. Bitter is definitely not one of them when it comes to this board. Funny? A lot of the time. I can't believe Trumpites are so dumb...under I remember who their king is. Followers are like their leaders I guess...

The only way you're funny is inadvertently.

And yes, leftists are angry and bitter. That's really not up for debate.

 

[daveman]

What's it matter? You're going to hate it no matter what. Not like that matters at all.

You mistake inquiry with hate. You are the epitome of a Trumpite. Like your Dear Leader you hate being questioned and you have an unmistakable belief that your way is the right way.

Sheer projection on your part. You can tell because you're here in the US message board, and I'm not on your Grump Shithole message board.

 

[Dr Grump]

What's it matter? You're going to hate it no matter what. Not like that matters at all.

You mistake inquiry with hate. You are the epitome of a Trumpite. Like your Dear Leader you hate being questioned and you have an unmistakable belief that your way is the right way.

Sheer projection on your part. You can tell because you're here in the US message board, and I'm not on your Grump Shithole message board.

People can read. They can tell you are full of piss and vinegar. I bet you're white, over 50, short, fat, probably smoke too much and like a gallon of sour mash every other day. C'mon how close am I??

 

[basquebromance]

BROTHERS AND SISTERS: I have seen cities destroyed. I have seen two hundred limping, exhausted men come out of line...the survivors of a regiment of one thousand that went forward forty-eight hours before. I have seen children starving. I have seen the agony of mothers and wives. I hate war! NO MORE WAAAAAAAR!

 

[Nostra]

Have we blowed up any Ragheads on surf boards today?

I WANT MY WWIII DANGBLAMMIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[daveman]

What's it matter? You're going to hate it no matter what. Not like that matters at all.

You mistake inquiry with hate. You are the epitome of a Trumpite. Like your Dear Leader you hate being questioned and you have an unmistakable belief that your way is the right way.

Sheer projection on your part. You can tell because you're here in the US message board, and I'm not on your Grump Shithole message board.

People can read. They can tell you are full of piss and vinegar. I bet you're white, over 50, short, fat, probably smoke too much and like a gallon of sour mash every other day. C'mon how close am I??

You're as accurate as you are everything else. Not at all.

But reality doesn't matter to you. You believe what you want to believe, and will continue to insist your beliefs are true regardless.

Run along, Foreign Boy. Your opinions are worthless.

 

[charwin95]

Americans and the military do appreciate it however.

Apparently only in your imagination, as his approval rating still sucks and the military publicly told him to stick his order up his ass.

And you're STILL bitterly clinging to your own lie.

Your desperation is palpable. And it smells.

All whining...no argument...yep, it's a daveman post...

We've been through this. I have no obligation to argue against your lies, especially when you're not interested in reality.

What reality? You don’t even have a clue what you are saying. Reality? Since you don’t know what you are talking about. Why not just STFU kid?

Your butthurt is not a compelling argument.

Butthurt? No idiot. You don’t even know what you are talking about except being a tough shit.
You don’t even know anything about ME but you keep blabbering your ignorance and stupidity.

I've lived and worked in the Middle East.

You just read press releases from the mullahs.

You're dismissed, boy.

Really? And how come you don’t know anything about ME. I’m giving away the Iran military capabilities and you act very surprised.

Iran must be invincible which is why they're not attacking Israel!
Am I missing something here?
If it works by computer, Israel will make anything Iran fires go back into Iran.

No they won’t unless they are provoke. Israel strategies are in defense mode not in the attack mode.
The same as saying Iran must be invincible that Israel’s has not drop any bomb in Iran but active in bombing of Iran’s interest in Syria.
.

You misinterpreted my post...
Jews don't attack; when attacked, they're supposed to warn...then obliterate.

My apologies.

 

[charwin95]

What's it matter? You're going to hate it no matter what. Not like that matters at all.

You mistake inquiry with hate. You are the epitome of a Trumpite. Like your Dear Leader you hate being questioned and you have an unmistakable belief that your way is the right way.

Sheer projection on your part. You can tell because you're here in the US message board, and I'm not on your Grump Shithole message board.

People can read. They can tell you are full of piss and vinegar. I bet you're white, over 50, short, fat, probably smoke too much and like a gallon of sour mash every other day. C'mon how close am I??

That is so funny Doc.
.

 

[charwin95]

Have we blowed up any Ragheads on surf boards today?

I WANT MY WWIII DANGBLAMMIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Don’t worry you will get your chance. Be very careful what you wish for.

Russians are harassing us in international waters and air.... WHY is that? They know we have a stupid and weakling president.

Russian warship 'aggressively approached' U.S. destroyer in Arabian Sea, Navy says

The USS Farragut was "conducting routine operations in the North Arabian Sea," according to the U.S. 5th Fleet.

www.nbcnews.com

Watch US and Russian warships almost collide

The incident may be all about China.

www.vox.com