Stewart bites the dust

[Uncensored2008]

No assault requires actions that cause or are meant to cause physical harm. Anything else is trying to punish speech and thought. Incitement is the closest thing, and that requires a person to actually call for physical attacks on others or property.

Is me calling you a lame loser SJW TDS dipshit assault?

Yes, and under the Nazi democrat Reich, will get you sent to the camps.

 

[ElmerMudd]

No assault requires actions that cause or are meant to cause physical harm. Anything else is trying to punish speech and thought. Incitement is the closest thing, and that requires a person to actually call for physical attacks on others or property.

Is me calling you a lame loser SJW TDS dipshit assault?

I should be charging you under-educated cult members for the education I am providing you.

What are the exceptions to the First Amendment?
a few narrow categories of speech are not protected from government restrictions. The main such categories are incitement, defamation, fraud, obscenity, child pornography, fighting words, and threats.

 

[BS Filter]

Trump did far more than that.

Trump stood up to the school yard bully. We have a parade of Republicans, going back to the Bush the Eviler, who cowered and quivered before the ruling democrats. Fearful of the powerful propaganda corps of the DNC controlled media, not just the absurdly fake news, but television, movies, even music that attacks anyone who fails to conform to the fascist edicts of the democrat Reich.

Trump did what any sensible person does when confronted by a bully, he punched them in the nose. He showed that the Nazi democrats can bleed.

This is why they hate him so deeply, why they are obsessed with destroying him. If Trump gets away with standing up to them, their power - which is based on fear - crumbles.

The assault on Rhodes is mostly to try to force him to perjure himself against Trump - he obviously refused.

Correct. Trump is the brave dog Toto in the Wizard of Oz who pulled back the curtain.

 

[BS Filter]

No. A charge for sedition.



As long as they don't commit sedition.



If those 5 judges commit sedition I would say yes.



They allow sedition in constitutional republics?



Just not a right to sedition.



Criticism isn't criminal, sedition is.



No. Sedition.



Sedition is codified law.


I didn't say anything about theatres but regardless you don't much about law do you?

No worries, I will teach you.

"(a)?Criminal Violation.--

(1)?In general.--Whoever engages in any conduct with intent to convey false or misleading information under circumstances where such information may reasonably be believed and where such information indicates that an activity has taken, is taking, or will take place that would constitute a violation of chapter 2, 10, 11B, 39, 40, 44, 111, or 113B of this title, section 236 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2284), or section 46502, the second sentence of section 46504, section 46505(b)(3) or (c), section 46506 if homicide or attempted homicide is involved, or section 60123(b) of title 49, shall--
(A)?be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both;
(B)?if serious bodily injury results, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both; ?and
(C)?if death results, be fined under this title or imprisoned for any number of years up to life, or both."

18 U.S.C. § 1038 - U.S. Code Title 18. Crimes and Criminal Procedure § 1038 | FindLaw

U.S. Title 18. Crimes and Criminal Procedure 18 USCA Section 1038. Read the code on FindLaw

codes.findlaw.com

Who is gonna be charged with sedition?

 

[Uncensored2008]

Who is gonna be charged with sedition?

Anyone who refuses to swear and oath of loyalty to the democrat Reich.

 

[Catsnmeters]

Who is gonna be charged with sedition?

Rhodes.

 

[BS Filter]

Rhodes.

What about Trump? I thought Trump was the leader?

 

[Catsnmeters]

What about Trump? I thought Trump was the leader?

I never mentioned Trump in the context of being charged with sedition. You got the right poster?

 

[Uncensored2008]

Rhodes.

The Kangaroo court convicted - with Oberfuhrer Garland leading the charge - yet Rhodes walks free today..

What went wrong? If Rhodes is able to speak without punishment, have you really crushed liberty?

I know Garland and his Gestapo goons are doing all the can to put an end to individual civil rights, but this doesn't look good for you fascists. Rhodes never set foot in a prison. How will your Reich coerce him to lie about Trump if you can't imprison him for speech?

 

[BS Filter]

I never mentioned Trump in the context of being charged with sedition. You got the right poster?

I understand that. Isn't Trump the leader of the insurrection?

 

[Uncensored2008]

What about Trump? I thought Trump was the leader?

Exactly, the trumped up charges against Rhodes are meant to force him to perjure himself against Trump.

 

[Catsnmeters]

The Kangaroo court convicted - with Oberfuhrer Garland leading the charge - yet Rhodes walks free today..

What went wrong? If Rhodes is able to speak without punishment, have you really crushed liberty?

He can speak. He just can't do sedition.

I know Garland and his Gestapo goons are doing all the can to put an end to individual civil rights,

Sedition is not a civil right.

but this doesn't look good for you fascists.

Fascist support sedition.

Rhodes never set foot in a prison. How will your Reich coerce him to lie about Trump if you can't imprison him for speech?

He isn't being imprisoned for speech. It is for sedition.

Funny you are preemptively giving cover for any confessions he may make about Trump to lower his sentence.

You worried?

 

[Uncensored2008]

I never mentioned Trump in the context of being charged with sedition. You got the right poster?

Still, this is entirely about getting Trump. No one actually gives a fuck about what Rhodes has to say - it's all a question of whether he can be coerced, intimidated, and blackmailed into providing false testimony against Trump.

 

[BS Filter]

He can speak. He just can't do sedition.



Sedition is not a civil right.



Fascist support sedition.


He isn't being imprisoned for speech. It is for sedition.

Funny you are preemptively giving cover for any confessions he may make about Trump to lower his sentence.

You worried?

When is Trump going to jail for trying to overthrow the government?

 

[Catsnmeters]

Still, this is entirely about getting Trump. No one actually gives a fuck about what Rhodes has to say - it's all a question of whether he can be coerced, intimidated, and blackmailed into providing false testimony against Trump.

So if he does make statements that implicate Trump, you have already decided he was "coerced, intimidated, and blackmailed."

The media has sure done a number on you.

 

[Catsnmeters]

When is Trump going to jail for trying to overthrow the government?

I didn't know that he was. Did you hear something?

 

[BS Filter]

I didn't know that he was. Did you hear something?

Isn't Trump the leader of the insurrectionists?

 

[Catsnmeters]

Isn't Trump the leader of the insurrectionists?

I don't know. Is he? I guess technically he was since he was president but then he was also the leader of the non insurrectionists too.

 

[WEATHER53]

Isn't Trump the leader of the insurrectionists?

It’s hard to be the leader of a movement that never existed. Insurrection is a liberal made up word that law enforcement agencies rebuke and media endorses

 

[Uncensored2008]

He can speak. He just can't do sedition.

Seig Heil.

Yet based on the Department of Injustice and Oberfuhrer Leaksensmears Garland, he DID "do sedition" by questioning the veracity of the 2020 election. Your joy at being able to throw those who speak against your Reich in prison must be somewhat dampened by his release pending appeal.

You GRASP WHY he would be released pending appeal, right? It's because there is a very high likelihood he will win the appeal.

If he does, have you really ended the 1st Amendment at all?

Sedition is not a civil right.

"Sedition" is a term used by tyrants to silence their political opponents.

America did away with it after it reared it's ugly head in WWI under the fascist Wilson.
The SCOTUS shut that shit down with the "Debs" case - looks like SCOTUS needs to snap the 4th Reich scum of your party back.

My question is whether Garland and his thugs will openly assault the court, or if you'll hire another assassins like you did a few months ago?

Perhaps Adolf Biden will declare himself dictator and dissolve the court?

Fascist support sedition.

Actually, fascist support the charge of sedition against political foes.

Why do you think no one has faced such a charge in America for over 100 years?

Again, this doesn't look good for your Reich. If this goes to the SCOTUS, your attempt to murder the Bill of Rights fails. Unless Biden attacks the court - which is very possible - given the open assault you are waging on the Constitutional Republic.

He isn't being imprisoned for speech. It is for sedition.

"Sedition" is speech. It is speech against the rulers of a nation.

That corrupt fuck Garland couldn't come up with any tangible evidence. So he charged him with speaking ill of the Nazi democrat party.

Funny you are preemptively giving cover for any confessions he may make about Trump to lower his sentence.

LOL

The only reason they went after him was to coerce perjury against Trump.

He refused and this is the result. But a DC jury and a Kangaroo court are very obvious - ergo he is out pending appeal - an appeal he is sure to win.

Notice that when he does win the appeal, the Reich propaganda corps won't say a word about it. It will just be buried.

You worried?

That Nazis rose in the land of my birth, ran a two year Kristallnacht, burning, looting, and murdering from coast to coast with no response from supposed law enforcement. That the democrat party is the 4th Reich, goosestepping in the footsteps of Adolf Hitler, with whites as the designated scapegoat. While those like you cheer the crushing of civil rights and lust for brutal totalitarianism? While openly corrupt officials in the FBI and Department of Injustice ignore actual crime to hunt down political enemies?

Why would I worry about that?