St. Louis couple defends their house from protestors, with guns. Do you support "stand your ground laws"?

[BULLDOG]

The trespassers should have been shot when they broke through the gate.

Had they shot the rioters, they would be in jail.

When you find that your laws don't protect you from marauding vandals who will rape, rob, burn, assault, and murder you ; but protect the criminals from YOU, then you know your society is doomed.

What indications did those two gun nuts have that they were going to be raped, robbed, assaulted, or murdered?

When the filthy low-life mob broke through the gate. It was gun nuts that founded this country that you claim to love. Enjoy your holiday brought to you by those gun nuts. Idiot.

The gate wasn't on their property dumb ass. You'll note none of the other home owners had a problem. Biff and Muffy had just been watching too much Fox, and their imagination ran away with them.

Who broke the law, the mob or the home owners?

Brandishing a weapon is illegal. Nobody bothered to file charges on any of the protestors.

 

[BS Filter]

The trespassers should have been shot when they broke through the gate.

Had they shot the rioters, they would be in jail.

When you find that your laws don't protect you from marauding vandals who will rape, rob, burn, assault, and murder you ; but protect the criminals from YOU, then you know your society is doomed.

What indications did those two gun nuts have that they were going to be raped, robbed, assaulted, or murdered?

When the filthy low-life mob broke through the gate. It was gun nuts that founded this country that you claim to love. Enjoy your holiday brought to you by those gun nuts. Idiot.

The gate wasn't on their property dumb ass. You'll note none of the other home owners had a problem. Biff and Muffy had just been watching too much Fox, and their imagination ran away with them.

Who broke the law, the mob or the home owners?

Brandishing a weapon is illegal. Nobody bothered to file charges on any of the protestors.

Nope. Breaking through a gated community is illegal. Idiot.

 

[22lcidw]

Those witless Karens were never in danger.
We know than any gathering of blacks scares you to death, pussy.

Couple of far left snowflakes who had just bought the guns.

They were is severe danger. Once the Klansmen breached the gates, what would follow is a well known pattern.

View attachment 358693

Real shame they didn't drill a few of you, because you vermin can't learn, but you do fear.

Reason is reserved to those more evolved than you, but emotions such as fear, you have plenty of.

We can never reason with you, but we can and MUST teach you to fear us.

And as we all look at the white boy in the process of throwing an object, you post this stump stupid bs.

That white boy is on your side. People like this need to be strained out of the protests. White or black. Because it turns into riots.

 

[BULLDOG]

Yes, it was a neighborhood.

The animals need to learn a hard lesson to stay the fuck out of suburbia.

It's a shame they didn't drop about 10 of the animals.

I thought advocating murder was against the rules, but it has become common place from right wing crazies lately.

 

[Oldestyle]

The trespassers should have been shot when they broke through the gate.

Had they shot the rioters, they would be in jail.

When you find that your laws don't protect you from marauding vandals who will rape, rob, burn, assault, and murder you ; but protect the criminals from YOU, then you know your society is doomed.

What indications did those two gun nuts have that they were going to be raped, robbed, assaulted, or murdered?

When the filthy low-life mob broke through the gate. It was gun nuts that founded this country that you claim to love. Enjoy your holiday brought to you by those gun nuts. Idiot.

The gate wasn't on their property dumb ass. You'll note none of the other home owners had a problem. Biff and Muffy had just been watching too much Fox, and their imagination ran away with them.

The gate WAS their property! It was also marked rather clearly on a sign ON said gate that it was Private Property! The other property owners are most likely liberal pussies who are scared the mob will return! When you cower in front of Black Lives Matter protesters they are emboldened. "Biff and Muffy" probably saved their neighbors from having their property damaged which makes them especially cowardly! They SHOULD have been out standing shoulder to shoulder with the only people with courage in that neighborhood!

That's just childishly dumb.

it's childish to protect your home? since when? it's one of the oldest human instincts

 

[BS Filter]

Yes, it was a neighborhood.

The animals need to learn a hard lesson to stay the fuck out of suburbia.

It's a shame they didn't drop about 10 of the animals.

I thought advocating murder was against the rules, but it has become common place from right wing crazies lately.

The two murders at CHOP weren't from right wing crazies. The epidemic of murder in Chicago isn't because of right wing crazies. Idiot.

 

[Oldestyle]

The trespassers should have been shot when they broke through the gate.

Had they shot the rioters, they would be in jail.

When you find that your laws don't protect you from marauding vandals who will rape, rob, burn, assault, and murder you ; but protect the criminals from YOU, then you know your society is doomed.

What indications did those two gun nuts have that they were going to be raped, robbed, assaulted, or murdered?

When the filthy low-life mob broke through the gate. It was gun nuts that founded this country that you claim to love. Enjoy your holiday brought to you by those gun nuts. Idiot.

The gate wasn't on their property dumb ass. You'll note none of the other home owners had a problem. Biff and Muffy had just been watching too much Fox, and their imagination ran away with them.

Who broke the law, the mob or the home owners?

Brandishing a weapon is illegal. Nobody bothered to file charges on any of the protestors.

Showing that you're armed is generally a good way to keep rioters away from your property. It's why protesters like gun free zones so much!

 

[BS Filter]

The trespassers should have been shot when they broke through the gate.

Had they shot the rioters, they would be in jail.

When you find that your laws don't protect you from marauding vandals who will rape, rob, burn, assault, and murder you ; but protect the criminals from YOU, then you know your society is doomed.

What indications did those two gun nuts have that they were going to be raped, robbed, assaulted, or murdered?

When the filthy low-life mob broke through the gate. It was gun nuts that founded this country that you claim to love. Enjoy your holiday brought to you by those gun nuts. Idiot.

The gate wasn't on their property dumb ass. You'll note none of the other home owners had a problem. Biff and Muffy had just been watching too much Fox, and their imagination ran away with them.

The gate WAS their property! It was also marked rather clearly on a sign ON said gate that it was Private Property! The other property owners are most likely liberal pussies who are scared the mob will return! When you cower in front of Black Lives Matter protesters they are emboldened. "Biff and Muffy" probably saved their neighbors from having their property damaged which makes them especially cowardly! They SHOULD have been out standing shoulder to shoulder with the only people with courage in that neighborhood!

That's just childishly dumb.

it's childish to protect your home? since when? it's one of the oldest human instincts

Bulldog is mentally disabled.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Missouri is a "stand your ground" state. People have the right to defend their home and property, period.

Stand-your-ground law - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

View attachment 357308

Couple pointing guns at protesters unlikely to face charges, law professor says

Could the gun-wielding attorneys find themselves in legal trouble? Not likely, according to one St. Louis law professor

www.ksdk.com

Even though the Leftist MSM wants legal action against the McClosky's for threatening "peaceful protestors", the law is on their side.

Do you support "stand your ground laws"? (poll)

That's a tough question for me.

I do not think it applies to this situation as no one was shot.

But IMO if anyone fires in self defense then that person must prove not only that he thought his safety was in danger but also why.

And the bias in the SYG laws that assume the person with the gun was not the aggressor is a tough hill to climb.

Let's say some guy was tailing you in a car for blocks, then got out of that car and started chasing you.

Let's also say that you are unarmed. Does the fact that a strange person was following you, stalking even rise to the SYG standards of feeling threatened?

If you are unarmed and you attack the person who has been stalking you because you perceived that as a threat to your safety, do you have the right to attack first even if you are unarmed? Should the primary aggressor ( the stalker) who shot the unarmed person who was standing his ground be the presumed victim?

1. Its an easy question, "self-defense" is legal
2. Read the Laws on "stand your ground" and the "castle doctrine" again, here is a link

Stand-your-ground law - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

3. If you "perceive" a threat on your property you can kill it. Your lawyer will prove what needs proving.
4. The laws are not "biased" except in some democrat areas, living in democrat area is your stupid fault.
5. If the stalker is chasing you, you have the right to defend yourself. Read the first sentence of the above link again.
6. If the stalker shoots the unarmed victim who was "standing his ground" trying to defend himself from an armed attacker, that's called murder. I'm sure that videos will be found documenting the aggressive murder. A better question is, why was the victim unarmed? Obviously a fatal error in judgment.

I know the SD laws. I have a CCW permit so I did my due diligence

So then in line with your reasoning here, Trayvon Martin had the right to attack George Zimmerman after all Zimmerman was stalking him and I think any reasonable person would think a stalker presented a threat to his safety..

So how come the SYG law wasn't applied to Martin instead of Zimmerman even though Zimmerman was the person stalking him?

And whether or not the victim in unarmed is irrelevant. Maybe he was too young to get a carry permit should that matter?

1. Trayvon was the burglar that Zimmerman was trying to protect the neighborhood from. They found loot and tools in his HS locker.
2. Zimmerman was a neighborhood watch volunteer. He was not stalking Trayvon "obsessively" and repeatedly with a personal issue per the definition of "stalker". Whose neighborhood was it? Who lived there? Whose "castle" was it? Are neighbor hood watch volunteers all "stalkers"? Trayvon attacked Zimmernam who defended himself. Why did Trayvon attack Zimmerman? It was not self-defense, nor defending his castle, nor was he standing his ground.
3. You can't define a neighborhood watch volunteer as a "stalker". They are by definition defending their neighborhood.
4. The SYG law doesn't apply to frustrated burglars. It applies to defenders of castles.
5. The Law is the Law. I have a carry permit. Felons can't get them, kids can't get them, etc. Trayvon was the criminal attacker, Zimmerman the law abiding defender.

Martin did not steal anything. He had no stolen property on his person.

He just committed the "crime" of being Black.

And Zimmerman followed Martin for blocks then got out of his car and stared chasing him AGAINST THE DIRECTIONS OF THE POLICE saying "These assholes always get away with it"

Well Martin was not "getting away" with anything since he was legally walking down the street to his father's fiancee's house where he was a guest.

And it is my opinion that Martin had every right to fear for his safety because some strange guy was following him in his car for blocks and then got out of his car and started chasing him.

If you were walking on the street and some guy was tailing you in his car then got out and ran after you would you feel threatened?

I would.

Martin was too young to get a carry permit or buy a gun since he was only 17. And the only way he could stand his ground was to physically attack the strange guy who was stalking him. And FYI stalking does not need to be obsessive. It is a verb.

So in this case it was Zimmerman who was the aggressor and Martin was standing his ground but because he wasn't armed you people think Zimmerman was the victim when he instigated the entire thing by IGNORING A LAWFUL ORDER FROM THE POLICE.

1. LIAR. Trayvon had stolen loot in his HS locker. He was the burglar. Funny hos the burgl;aries stopped after he died?? WTF?? How did that happen?
2. Play the fucking race card when you criminals get caught. AHs need to stay in your slums.

What was in his locker is irrelevant. He was not committing any crimes the night Zimmerman disobeyed a police order are chased him. He was simply walking to the home of his father's fiancee.

And FYI I'm not a criminal, never have been.

And I'll bet my net worth is higher than yours

1. The stolen loot is "relevant", proper search warrant or not.
2. The crime he committed was to attack a neighborhood watchman.
3. Not calling you a criminal, just pissed about the riots and high city crime rates.
4. Your net worth could be higher, but I'm very happy with my life not near cities.

The stolen merchandise is completely irrelevant to the shooting incident. When Zimmerman stalked Martin he had committed no crime. He had no stolen property on him. He was just walking to someone's house where he was a guest.

And Zimmerman never identified himself and neighborhood watch or not he had no authority to do anything. And he disobeyed the cop who told him not to get out of his car and chase Martin. Zimmerman was the aggressor and instigated the entire circumstance.

And you assume I live in a city?

Wrong again Bubba.
I grew up on the shitty side of a city but now I live on 12 acres of beautiful farmland surrounded on 3 sides by state conservation land so I have a couple hundred acres of land right in my back yard.

Run along with your assumptions now Bubba.

You have the facts of that case all wrong.

Martin attacked Zimmerman. Had Martin not attacked and started beating the shit out of Zimmerman, Martin might still be alive, committing all sorts of crimes today.

 

[BULLDOG]

The trespassers should have been shot when they broke through the gate.

Had they shot the rioters, they would be in jail.

When you find that your laws don't protect you from marauding vandals who will rape, rob, burn, assault, and murder you ; but protect the criminals from YOU, then you know your society is doomed.

What indications did those two gun nuts have that they were going to be raped, robbed, assaulted, or murdered?

When the filthy low-life mob broke through the gate. It was gun nuts that founded this country that you claim to love. Enjoy your holiday brought to you by those gun nuts. Idiot.

The gate wasn't on their property dumb ass. You'll note none of the other home owners had a problem. Biff and Muffy had just been watching too much Fox, and their imagination ran away with them.

Who broke the law, the mob or the home owners?

Brandishing a weapon is illegal. Nobody bothered to file charges on any of the protestors.

Nope. Breaking through a gated community is illegal. Idiot.

Only if the HOA complains. Otherwise, it is acceptable entry. There was no complaint.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

The trespassers should have been shot when they broke through the gate.

Had they shot the rioters, they would be in jail.

When you find that your laws don't protect you from marauding vandals who will rape, rob, burn, assault, and murder you ; but protect the criminals from YOU, then you know your society is doomed.

What indications did those two gun nuts have that they were going to be raped, robbed, assaulted, or murdered?

When the filthy low-life mob broke through the gate. It was gun nuts that founded this country that you claim to love. Enjoy your holiday brought to you by those gun nuts. Idiot.

The gate wasn't on their property dumb ass. You'll note none of the other home owners had a problem. Biff and Muffy had just been watching too much Fox, and their imagination ran away with them.

Who broke the law, the mob or the home owners?

Brandishing a weapon is illegal. Nobody bothered to file charges on any of the protestors.

That specific brandishing crime in Missouri is called "Unlawful Use of Weapon."

Nothing about the homeowners' use of weapons was unlawful, as the rioters broke down their gate and were approaching their house on private property in large numbers.

https://law.justia.com/codes/missouri/2005/t38/5710000030.html 5. Subdivisions (3), (4), (5), (6), (7), (8), (9), and (10) of subsection 1 of this section shall not apply to persons who are engaged in a lawful act of defense pursuant to section 563.031, RSMo.


BUT I WONDER WHY THE DEMOCRAT POLITICIAN DIDN'T FILE CHARGES AGAINST THE PROTESTORS?

 

[BULLDOG]

The trespassers should have been shot when they broke through the gate.

Had they shot the rioters, they would be in jail.

When you find that your laws don't protect you from marauding vandals who will rape, rob, burn, assault, and murder you ; but protect the criminals from YOU, then you know your society is doomed.

What indications did those two gun nuts have that they were going to be raped, robbed, assaulted, or murdered?

When the filthy low-life mob broke through the gate. It was gun nuts that founded this country that you claim to love. Enjoy your holiday brought to you by those gun nuts. Idiot.

The gate wasn't on their property dumb ass. You'll note none of the other home owners had a problem. Biff and Muffy had just been watching too much Fox, and their imagination ran away with them.

The gate WAS their property! It was also marked rather clearly on a sign ON said gate that it was Private Property! The other property owners are most likely liberal pussies who are scared the mob will return! When you cower in front of Black Lives Matter protesters they are emboldened. "Biff and Muffy" probably saved their neighbors from having their property damaged which makes them especially cowardly! They SHOULD have been out standing shoulder to shoulder with the only people with courage in that neighborhood!

That's just childishly dumb.

it's childish to protect your home? since when? it's one of the oldest human instincts

How was their home threatened?

 

[Oldestyle]

The trespassers should have been shot when they broke through the gate.

Had they shot the rioters, they would be in jail.

When you find that your laws don't protect you from marauding vandals who will rape, rob, burn, assault, and murder you ; but protect the criminals from YOU, then you know your society is doomed.

What indications did those two gun nuts have that they were going to be raped, robbed, assaulted, or murdered?

When the filthy low-life mob broke through the gate. It was gun nuts that founded this country that you claim to love. Enjoy your holiday brought to you by those gun nuts. Idiot.

The gate wasn't on their property dumb ass. You'll note none of the other home owners had a problem. Biff and Muffy had just been watching too much Fox, and their imagination ran away with them.

Who broke the law, the mob or the home owners?

Brandishing a weapon is illegal. Nobody bothered to file charges on any of the protestors.

Nope. Breaking through a gated community is illegal. Idiot.

Only if the HOA complains. Otherwise, it is acceptable entry. There was no complaint.

The Police were called. Two of the home owners were standing in their front yard with weapons telling the protesters they were on private property and to leave. What defines a "complaint" in your book, Bulldog?

 

[Oldestyle]

The trespassers should have been shot when they broke through the gate.

Had they shot the rioters, they would be in jail.

When you find that your laws don't protect you from marauding vandals who will rape, rob, burn, assault, and murder you ; but protect the criminals from YOU, then you know your society is doomed.

What indications did those two gun nuts have that they were going to be raped, robbed, assaulted, or murdered?

When the filthy low-life mob broke through the gate. It was gun nuts that founded this country that you claim to love. Enjoy your holiday brought to you by those gun nuts. Idiot.

The gate wasn't on their property dumb ass. You'll note none of the other home owners had a problem. Biff and Muffy had just been watching too much Fox, and their imagination ran away with them.

The gate WAS their property! It was also marked rather clearly on a sign ON said gate that it was Private Property! The other property owners are most likely liberal pussies who are scared the mob will return! When you cower in front of Black Lives Matter protesters they are emboldened. "Biff and Muffy" probably saved their neighbors from having their property damaged which makes them especially cowardly! They SHOULD have been out standing shoulder to shoulder with the only people with courage in that neighborhood!

That's just childishly dumb.

it's childish to protect your home? since when? it's one of the oldest human instincts

How was their home threatened?

A large group of protesters was approaching it? After weeks of protests that turned violent? After numerous examples of looting and burning of private property by protesters? If you didn't see a threat in what was happening then I would posit that you're a bit naïve!

 

[Hutch Starskey]

It was a neighborhood, dope. They were marching to the mayor's home. There was no violence to condone.

Tearing down an iron fence and an iron gate isn't violence?

View attachment 358685

You Marxist scum are fucking retards.

They're mentally deficient. A few of their power cords aren't plugged in.

You can't argue with unreason.

This is an Alinsky tactic, by being stupid and unreasonable, the radical Marxists are unassailable and seek to frustrate their enemy.

Reason has no impact on the Marxists, only superior strength. Buy guns, buy ammo. It is the ONLY argument the democrats grasp.

Those witless Karens were never in danger.
We know than any gathering of blacks scares you to death, pussy.

BTW....guns are useless when all you do is bitch online, loser "Alpha boi".

I agree, they weren't in danger because they showed the trash their guns. So you want me to swallow your propaganda and ignore the FACT that people have been assaulted and their property burned and looted. Idiot.

I agree, they weren't in danger because they showed the trash their guns. So you want me to swallow your propaganda and ignore the FACT that people have been assaulted and their property burned and looted. Idiot.

You're the victim of propaganda, dope.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Missouri is a "stand your ground" state. People have the right to defend their home and property, period.

Stand-your-ground law - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

View attachment 357308

Couple pointing guns at protesters unlikely to face charges, law professor says

Could the gun-wielding attorneys find themselves in legal trouble? Not likely, according to one St. Louis law professor

www.ksdk.com

Even though the Leftist MSM wants legal action against the McClosky's for threatening "peaceful protestors", the law is on their side.

Do you support "stand your ground laws"? (poll)

These two white elitist ambulance chasers buy a historic, downtown home 500 feet away from a largely Black/Hispanic neighborhood and along with an interior decorator they bring guns and an AR-15. What's wrong with that picture?

If the are so fearful of inner-city St. Louis they should have bought a house in the suburbs.

The McCloskeys confronted the protesters, not the other way arround. The McCloskeys were on the OFFENSIVE.
They should have stayed inside and called the police if they felt their property was being trespassed. (Sidewalk and street!)
But they've obviously been jonesing to use their toys for a long fucking time.

Lie some more commie.

The BLM Klansman tore the gate and fence down - retard.

That's pretty fucking confrontational.

The McCloskeys should have opened fire. But they are snowflakes.

You're the fucking liar, liar.
Video shows gate was intact when St. Louis couple pointed guns at protesters

Video shows gate was intact when St. Louis couple pointed guns at protesters

Videos and photographs show the couple pacing on their Portland Place property, periodically pointing the weapons at the crowd

www.ksdk.com

And the gate is not on the McCloskey property, it belongs to the city of St. Louis, you stupid fucking idiot.

You're lying. The VIDEO shows no such thing. The reporter says that a "protester" (rioter) stated "We dindo nuffin" denying they broke down the gate.

You're lying. The VIDEO shows no such thing. The reporter says that a "protester" (rioter) stated "We dindo nuffin" denying they broke down the gate.

Try the link in the article, dope.

 

[BULLDOG]

The trespassers should have been shot when they broke through the gate.

Had they shot the rioters, they would be in jail.

When you find that your laws don't protect you from marauding vandals who will rape, rob, burn, assault, and murder you ; but protect the criminals from YOU, then you know your society is doomed.

What indications did those two gun nuts have that they were going to be raped, robbed, assaulted, or murdered?

When the filthy low-life mob broke through the gate. It was gun nuts that founded this country that you claim to love. Enjoy your holiday brought to you by those gun nuts. Idiot.

The gate wasn't on their property dumb ass. You'll note none of the other home owners had a problem. Biff and Muffy had just been watching too much Fox, and their imagination ran away with them.

Who broke the law, the mob or the home owners?

Brandishing a weapon is illegal. Nobody bothered to file charges on any of the protestors.

Nope. Breaking through a gated community is illegal. Idiot.

Only if the HOA complains. Otherwise, it is acceptable entry. There was no complaint.

The Police were called. Two of the home owners were standing in their front yard with weapons telling the protesters they were on private property and to leave. What defines a "complaint" in your book, Bulldog?

Someone with the authority to file a complaint. That would be the HOA. The gun nuts were just residents, and nobody went on their property.

 

[Blaine Sweeter]

McCloskeys lied about the gate being broken down.
(Of course they lie, they're ambulance chasers!)
Protesters went through the entrance on the left.

Meet the McCloskeys: How Private Places Act as a Form of Spatial Anti-Blackness in St. Louis — Streetsblog USA

Two white homeowners threatened the lives of Black Lives Mater protesters in on a private street in St. Louis on Sunday, raising new questions about anti-Black racism in pseudo-public space.

usa.streetsblog.org

Nope, you're lying.

Fuck off now. No one believes you.

Pictures don't lie.
But Pieces of shit like you, do.
They used the entrance on the left.
McCloskeys lied.

LOL

Even the video that you blatantly lied about earlier showed that the gate had been put back up and is held up by chains, you lying little fuck.

Now ooze back into the sewer. You have zero credibility.

That means I still have more credibility than you.
McCloskey lied about the main gate, fuckface.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

The trespassers should have been shot when they broke through the gate.

Had they shot the rioters, they would be in jail.

When you find that your laws don't protect you from marauding vandals who will rape, rob, burn, assault, and murder you ; but protect the criminals from YOU, then you know your society is doomed.

What indications did those two gun nuts have that they were going to be raped, robbed, assaulted, or murdered?

When the filthy low-life mob broke through the gate. It was gun nuts that founded this country that you claim to love. Enjoy your holiday brought to you by those gun nuts. Idiot.

The gate wasn't on their property dumb ass. You'll note none of the other home owners had a problem. Biff and Muffy had just been watching too much Fox, and their imagination ran away with them.

The gate WAS their property! It was also marked rather clearly on a sign ON said gate that it was Private Property! The other property owners are most likely liberal pussies who are scared the mob will return! When you cower in front of Black Lives Matter protesters they are emboldened. "Biff and Muffy" probably saved their neighbors from having their property damaged which makes them especially cowardly! They SHOULD have been out standing shoulder to shoulder with the only people with courage in that neighborhood!

That's just childishly dumb.

it's childish to protect your home? since when? it's one of the oldest human instincts

How was their home threatened?

YEAH, EXACTLY!!! How was their home threatened by an angry mob who just destroyed a gate to gain access.

No reasonable person would EVER feel threatened, would they?


(this is dripping with sarcasm, if you can't tell)

We're just going to have to agree to disagree, because in your mind, NO CIRCUMSTANCE justifies the use of a firearm in self defense.

You don't believe in the right of self defense.

But, if I am wrong, please describe for me a scenario where you believe the use of a firearm in self defense is justified.

 

[Blaine Sweeter]

Missouri is a "stand your ground" state. People have the right to defend their home and property, period.

Stand-your-ground law - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

View attachment 357308

Couple pointing guns at protesters unlikely to face charges, law professor says

Could the gun-wielding attorneys find themselves in legal trouble? Not likely, according to one St. Louis law professor

www.ksdk.com

Even though the Leftist MSM wants legal action against the McClosky's for threatening "peaceful protestors", the law is on their side.

Do you support "stand your ground laws"? (poll)

These two white elitist ambulance chasers buy a historic, downtown home 500 feet away from a largely Black/Hispanic neighborhood and along with an interior decorator they bring guns and an AR-15. What's wrong with that picture?

If the are so fearful of inner-city St. Louis they should have bought a house in the suburbs.

The McCloskeys confronted the protesters, not the other way arround. The McCloskeys were on the OFFENSIVE.
They should have stayed inside and called the police if they felt their property was being trespassed. (Sidewalk and street!)
But they've obviously been jonesing to use their toys for a long fucking time.

Lie some more commie.

The BLM Klansman tore the gate and fence down - retard.

That's pretty fucking confrontational.

The McCloskeys should have opened fire. But they are snowflakes.

You're the fucking liar, liar.
Video shows gate was intact when St. Louis couple pointed guns at protesters

Video shows gate was intact when St. Louis couple pointed guns at protesters

Videos and photographs show the couple pacing on their Portland Place property, periodically pointing the weapons at the crowd

www.ksdk.com

And the gate is not on the McCloskey property, it belongs to the city of St. Louis, you stupid fucking idiot.

You're lying. The VIDEO shows no such thing. The reporter says that a "protester" (rioter) stated "We dindo nuffin" denying they broke down the gate.

You're lying. The VIDEO shows no such thing. The reporter says that a "protester" (rioter) stated "We dindo nuffin" denying they broke down the gate.

Try the link in the article, dope.

Oooops! This is going to give UnRaveled2008 a big ol' butthurt!
Thanks for posting this video.