Some Dems now saying that Bill Clinton should have resigned for sex scandal, so Trump should, too

[gipper]

How the far left forget about the abuse of women along the way to the white house.

The impeachment process of Bill Clinton was initiated by the House of Representatives on December 19, 1998, against Bill Clinton, the 42nd President of the United States, on two charges, one of perjury and one of obstruction of justice.

Impeachment of Bill Clinton - Wikipedia

In sending the case forward, the House Judiciary Committee had relied heavily on a four-year investigation into several alleged scandals—including improper Arkansas real estate deals, suspected fundraising violations, claims of sexual harassment and accusations of cronyism involving the firing of White House travel agents—involving Clinton and his wife, Hillary.

House votes to impeach Clinton , Oct. 8, 1998

IMPEACHMENT: THE OVERVIEW -- CLINTON IMPEACHED; HE FACES A SENATE TRIAL, 2D IN HISTORY; VOWS TO DO JOB TILL TERM'S 'LAST HOUR'

And you can see that the far left will always protect their own, just look at all those that think Fraken did nothing wrong as it was supposed to be a humorous picture.

Clinton was found not guilty. I'm not surprised you don't know that.

The investigation centered on consensual sex. Yes, 20+ years laters a good number have changed their mind, "liberals" too. So, if any thing was learned, it is be more careful in impeaching, and sex isn't the only grounds to impeach.

Monica went there to play with the president. she wasn't the problem and she wasn't troubled by it in terms of feeling victimized. (though, like a lot of women who cheat with a married man, she got hurt because she realized she was just playtime). it was Linda Tripp and her fellow Clinton haters who reported that.... not the person involved in the relationship.

Gillibrand deserves credit for coming out against the Clinton's. Maybe the Clinton's will finally get what they are due.


Why Kirsten Gillibrand saying that Bill Clinton should’ve resigned is a big deal
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand on Thursday went to a place that few Democrats have dared or cared to go when it comes to allegations of sexual assault: Calling out Bill Clinton.

From the New York Times:

Asked directly if she believed Mr. Clinton should have stepped down [when he faced his own allegations as president], Ms. Gillibrand took a long pause and said, “Yes, I think that is the appropriate response.”

That long pause suggests this was not something that the senator from New York said lightly, nor that she necessarily planned on saying. Yet here we are.
Analysis | Why Kirsten Gillibrand saying that Bill Clinton should’ve resigned is a big deal

She's probably going to run for president and probably doesn't want to do that dragging any Clinton baggage along with her.

But you still adore Bubba and Cankles right?

 

[jillian]

Most conservatives believe Clinton should have resigned, but don't believe Trump should.

That would be your hypocrisy, dumbass.

No, the hypocrisy is how YOU defended Clinton and DIDN'T call for his resignation but are calling for Trump's now, even though Clinton lied under oath (an impeachable offense).

lol, Clinton was impeached and found not guilty.

He didn't stand trial for anything, how could he be found "not guilty"? You are so dumb.

presidents can't (presumably) be charged in criminal actions. the only way to try them is by impeachment. impeachment is the trial not a conviction. the house brings charges and the senate acts as the jury. in bill's case the senate, acquitted him, dumbass.

that was your civics lesson for today -- something you should have studied before you opened your mouth

 

[basquebromance]

The media and Democrats (i repeat myself) now calling for Bill Clinton to resign 20 years later tells you everything you need to know about them

 

[S.J.]

Most conservatives believe Clinton should have resigned, but don't believe Trump should.

That would be your hypocrisy, dumbass.

No, the hypocrisy is how YOU defended Clinton and DIDN'T call for his resignation but are calling for Trump's now, even though Clinton lied under oath (an impeachable offense).

lol, Clinton was impeached and found not guilty.

He didn't stand trial for anything, how could he be found "not guilty"? You are so dumb.

Impeachment leads to a trial in the Senate.

Except that you sad he was found "not guilty". He wasn't. In fact, the Senate said he was guilty but that it "doesn't rise to the level of impeachment". They avoided dealing with removing him but he was NOT found "not guilty" like you claimed.

 

[S.J.]

Most conservatives believe Clinton should have resigned, but don't believe Trump should.

That would be your hypocrisy, dumbass.

No, the hypocrisy is how YOU defended Clinton and DIDN'T call for his resignation but are calling for Trump's now, even though Clinton lied under oath (an impeachable offense).

lol, Clinton was impeached and found not guilty.

He didn't stand trial for anything, how could he be found "not guilty"? You are so dumb.

presidents can't (presumably) be charged in criminal actions. the only way to try them is by impeachment. impeachment is the trial not a conviction. the house brings charges and the senate acts as the jury. in bill's case the senate, acquitted him, dumbass.

that was your civics lesson for today -- something you should have studied before you opened your mouth

Read post #84, dumbshit. PS, you're too stupid to give anyone a lesson on anything, let alone civics.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Most conservatives believe Clinton should have resigned, but don't believe Trump should.

That would be your hypocrisy, dumbass.

No, the hypocrisy is how YOU defended Clinton and DIDN'T call for his resignation but are calling for Trump's now, even though Clinton lied under oath (an impeachable offense).

lol, Clinton was impeached and found not guilty.

He didn't stand trial for anything, how could he be found "not guilty"? You are so dumb.

Impeachment leads to a trial in the Senate.

Except that you sad he was found "not guilty". He wasn't. In fact, the Senate said he was guilty but that it "doesn't rise to the level of impeachment". They avoided dealing with removing him but he was NOT found "not guilty" like you claimed.

No such thing happened. He was acquitted on both charges.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Dems...

...Now, in hindsight, we should have made Bill Clinton resign.

Just audacious.

 

[jillian]

Most conservatives believe Clinton should have resigned, but don't believe Trump should.

That would be your hypocrisy, dumbass.

No, the hypocrisy is how YOU defended Clinton and DIDN'T call for his resignation but are calling for Trump's now, even though Clinton lied under oath (an impeachable offense).

lol, Clinton was impeached and found not guilty.

He didn't stand trial for anything, how could he be found "not guilty"? You are so dumb.

presidents can't (presumably) be charged in criminal actions. the only way to try them is by impeachment. impeachment is the trial not a conviction. the house brings charges and the senate acts as the jury. in bill's case the senate, acquitted him, dumbass.

that was your civics lesson for today -- something you should have studied before you opened your mouth

Read post #84, dumbshit. PS, you're too stupid to give anyone a lesson on anything, let alone civics.

That's funny you insane freak. If that were the case you wouldn't sound like a total moron and I wouldn't have schooled you. Both of which are the case

Or you can continue to sound like the uneducated ignoramois you are.

All the same to me.

 

[Freewill]

Sacrificing the clown to take out the king, sounds like a chess move.

It is so transparent what the left is doing, I really doubt there isn't a level to which they won't stoop to try and be relevant.

 

[Freewill]

 

[2aguy]

Politics at its finest!

Looking back, some Dems say Bill Clinton should have resigned.....so that means Trump should resign.

So hilarious. The hypocrisy is off the charts.


Gillibrand: Bill Clinton should have resigned over Lewinsky affair - CNNPolitics

Yes.....after he is out of office 19 years.....how big of them.....

 

[Kosh]

see the far left still supports the sexual predator Bill Clinton..

They still support his enabler Hilary.

The far left does not have a leg to stand on in this battle after supporting and voting for Hilary the enabler.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Politics at its finest!

Looking back, some Dems say Bill Clinton should have resigned.....so that means Trump should resign.

So hilarious. The hypocrisy is off the charts.


Gillibrand: Bill Clinton should have resigned over Lewinsky affair - CNNPolitics

Yes.....after he is out of office 19 years.....how big of them.....

That’s what makes it so hilarious.

When will Dems go on record and say that Ted Kennedy should not have allowed Mary Joe Kopecknae to drown in his car?

They are so bold.

 

[basquebromance]

Folks like Donna Brazile and Mika don't throw Hillary under the bus without approval from on high. The Clinton Brand purge has begun. Get ready for "New Coke" Democrats.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Folks like Donna Brazile and Mika don't throw Hillary under the bus without approval from on high. The Clinton Brand purge has begun. Get ready for "New Coke" Democrats.

This is spot on. I am going to love watching those criminals fall from grace.

 

[S.J.]

No, the hypocrisy is how YOU defended Clinton and DIDN'T call for his resignation but are calling for Trump's now, even though Clinton lied under oath (an impeachable offense).

lol, Clinton was impeached and found not guilty.

He didn't stand trial for anything, how could he be found "not guilty"? You are so dumb.

presidents can't (presumably) be charged in criminal actions. the only way to try them is by impeachment. impeachment is the trial not a conviction. the house brings charges and the senate acts as the jury. in bill's case the senate, acquitted him, dumbass.

that was your civics lesson for today -- something you should have studied before you opened your mouth

Read post #84, dumbshit. PS, you're too stupid to give anyone a lesson on anything, let alone civics.

That's funny you insane freak. If that were the case you wouldn't sound like a total moron and I wouldn't have schooled you. Both of which are the case

Or you can continue to sound like the uneducated ignoramois you are.

All the same to me.

Another ad hominem rant, void of substance. I'm sure most would agree that the only thing you ever offer on this forum is name calling, most of which are on a 5th grade level at best.

 

[Aletheia4u]