I have no idea but this is out of the normal big time. It looks to me as if this is what happened. Someone sent a memo to Gates and said squash it. Gates sends memo down to reservist commander saying squash it, and it gets squashed.
This guy didn't win anything. Here are the facts:
Cook (the plaintiff) requested to be deployed for the sole reason of raising this court issue.
HRC-STL, of which COL Good (the defendent) is the commander honored his request. It is HRC-STL's policy to allow those who volunteer for deployment to opt out at any time before they report (far different from involuntary mobilizations. Cook was not involuntarily mobilized).
When Cook filed suit, HRC-STL took that to be the same as an "opt out" and simply lifted his orders.
I imagine COL Good has better things to do than waste her time appearing in frivelous suits. I don't believe the "birther" stance for a second that there was some phantom communication from the SECDEF. It makes no sense.
As does most of the birther mantra. Check out the other thread for some more facts.