Socialism is more popular than Project 2025

[BackAgain]

You want your plans to seem irrelevant because they won't stand up to the scrutiny of public evaluation.

The Heritage Foundation has many good ideas in Project 2025. But that’s irrelvant since Trump’s plans are Agenda 47.

And your attempt to conflate them are as VAPID as you tend to be. Ie, VERY.

 

[Lisa558]

You claim to be intelligent, but your facts do not indicate intelligence. Intelligent people are curious and open minded. They are also able to defend their opinions.

Yeah, yeah….you tried to insult my intelligence before. Ain’t gonna work, hon.

 

[Lisa558]

You want your plans to seem irrelevant because they won't stand up to the scrutiny of public evaluation.

So what’s wrong with the Heritage Plan, that has nothing to do with Trump anyway?

 

[BULLDOG]

So what’s wrong with the Heritage Plan, that has nothing to do with Trump anyway?

Then why is his name mentioned 312 times in those 900+ pages?

 

[BackAgain]

Then why is his name mentioned 312 times in those 900+ pages?

Irrelevant. They like him.

 

[M14 Shooter]

I'm just not going to discuss bullshit...

The only bullshit here is your claim:

The Heritage Foundation wish list for transforming the U.S government into a fascist dictatorship...

Nothing in the 900 page Project 2025 document constitutes a rational or factual basis for this claim.

Why did you present this bullshit?

 

[Hector12]

Yeah, yeah….you tried to insult my intelligence before. Ain’t gonna work, hon.

It won't work as soon as you post comments that indicate intelligence, learning, and civility, rather than irritable attitudes.

You do not seem to do much reading. Right now, I am reading the King James translation of the Apocrypha. Without going to Google, can you tell me what that is? I know JoeB131 does not know. I think you might.

 

[Lisa558]

It won't work as soon as you post comments that indicate intelligence, learning, and civility, rather than irritable attitudes.

Just because you are a lib and disagree with my positions does not mean my comments are unintelligent.

All you’re doing is revealing how arrogant liberals are: “agree with me, or I’ll insult your personally.”

 

[Hector12]

It won't work as soon as you post comments that indicate intelligence, learning, and civility, rather than irritable attitudes.

You do not seem to do much reading. Right now, I am reading the King James translation of the Apocrypha. Without going to Google, can you tell me what that is? I know JoeB131 does not know. I think you might.

Tell us what you know about the Apocrypha, BackAgain.

 

[Hector12]

All you’re doing is revealing how arrogant liberals are: “agree with me, or I’ll insult your personally.”

Arrogant liberals and arrogant conservatives have said that to me.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

If the Nazi movement was left wing, why did Nazi storm troopers fight German Communists in the street?

If Stalin was a Commie, why did he kill so many Commies?

 

[Hector12]

If Stalin was a Commie, why did he kill so many Commies?

The situations are not comparable. Wealthy Germans supported the Nazis. They did not support the Communists.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The situations are not comparable. Wealthy Germans supported the Nazis. They did not support the Communists.

Commies killed the political competition.
Nazis killed the political competition.

Doesn't change the fact that both groups are left-wingers.

 

[Hector12]

Commies killed the political competition.
Nazis killed the political competition.

Doesn't change the fact that both groups are left-wingers.

In Mein Kampf Hitler condemns Communists and Social Democrats. He never condemns anyone on the right.

 

[Hector12]

Commies killed the political competition.
Nazis killed the political competition.

Doesn't change the fact that both groups are left-wingers.

In Mein Kampf, Volume I, Chapter IV, "Munich" Hitler wrote:

"If one wanted land and soil in Europe, then by and large this could only have been done at Russia's expense...

"For such a policy, however, there was only one single ally in Europe: England...

"To gain England's favor, no sacrifice should have been too great. Then one would have had to renounce colonies and sea power, but to spare British industry our competition."

That is not something a man on the left would have written.

 

[Stann]

In a recent NBC survey of registered voters that gauged the popularity of several things, it was shown that Socialism has more likes and fewer dislikes than Project 2025. With MAGAs eager to classify anything they don't like as Socialism; it's telling to note that it is still more popular than the right-wing plan to purge the government of all whose allegiance is to the constitution rather than trump. When they put out a several hundred-page report about what they intend to do, we should pay attention and vote to stop such heinous actions.

MSN

Of course it is , it has to be freely chosen. project 2025 is something a group of people want to force on the rest of US. It's the opposite of American values.Fascism in it's worst form.

 

[MarcATL]

more left wing BS, everything done by a government is not socialist. Under socialism the government OWNS everything, there is no private property or private ownership of anything. The people are slaves to the government, is that really how you want to live?

You're the one among the idiots claiming that America is doing socialism, which you defined here, and isn't happening.

You ought to stop while you're behind.

 

[Soupnazi630]

The closest approximation to democratic socialism is Scandinavian Social Democracy. By criteria I value that is superior to American casino capitalism, where the odds favor the house.

Democrativc socialism is merely socialism with lipstick and always fails

There is no scandnavian social democracy

Massive fail for you

 

[Soupnazi630]

The closest approximation to democratic socialism is Scandinavian Social Democracy. By criteria I value that is superior to American casino capitalism, where the odds favor the house.

Democrativc socialism is merely socialism with lipstick and always fails

There is no scandnavian social democracy

Massive fail for you

It isa fact, and very relevant.

 

[Soupnazi630]

It isa fact, and very relevant.

It is not relevant

National Socialism was also popular once but a disaster and we do not change government based on POPULARITY