So, What Was The Bottom Line To The Chat Group Security Flub?

[Lesh]

But we all know it’s a lie. Why do they repeat things that are obvious lies?

Signal is not approved to store and transmit classified information.

It also violates the records preservation laws

 

[Marener]

It also violates the records preservation laws

Maybe. Probably. I suppose there’s some way the government could have a system that archives the messages but I have doubts.

There won’t be any investigation so we never really will know.

Zero accountability.

 

[Edgetho]

While dimocrap scum are sucking all the air out of the room in an effort to make THEIR narrative the only narrative, the real questions go unanswered --

Much Ado About a Signal Chat | Frontpage Mag

The Left tries ferociously to gin up a new Trump scandal.

www.frontpagemag.com

National security advisor Michael Waltz said of The Atlantic’s far-left scandalmonger Jeffrey Goldberg, the “journalist” who was somehow added to the Signal chat: “I’m not a conspiracy theorist, but of all the people out there, somehow this guy – who has lied about the president, who has lied to Gold Star families, lied to their attorneys and gone to Russia hoax, gone to just all kinds of lengths to lie and smear the president of the United States – and he’s the one that somehow gets on somebody’s contact and then gets sucked into this group.”

That’s the real question: is there another deep state operative in Waltz’s agency who is trying to emulate Miles Taylor? Taylor was the young Trump administration official who shot to a kind of fame in September 2018, when he wrote an anonymous op-ed in the New York Times that was one of the first open acknowledgments that there was a coterie of federal bureaucrats that is determined to thwart Trump’s agenda by any means possible: “I Am Part of the Resistance Inside the Trump Administration: I work for the president but like-minded colleagues and I have vowed to thwart parts of his agenda and his worst inclinations.”

 

[Lesh]

While dimocrap scum are sucking all the air out of the room in an effort to make THEIR narrative the only narrative, the real questions go unanswered --

Much Ado About a Signal Chat | Frontpage Mag

The Left tries ferociously to gin up a new Trump scandal.

www.frontpagemag.com

National security advisor Michael Waltz said of The Atlantic’s far-left scandalmonger Jeffrey Goldberg, the “journalist” who was somehow added to the Signal chat: “I’m not a conspiracy theorist, but of all the people out there, somehow this guy – who has lied about the president, who has lied to Gold Star families, lied to their attorneys and gone to Russia hoax, gone to just all kinds of lengths to lie and smear the president of the United States – and he’s the one that somehow gets on somebody’s contact and then gets sucked into this group.”

That’s the real question: is there another deep state operative in Waltz’s agency who is trying to emulate Miles Taylor? Taylor was the young Trump administration official who shot to a kind of fame in September 2018, when he wrote an anonymous op-ed in the New York Times that was one of the first open acknowledgments that there was a coterie of federal bureaucrats that is determined to thwart Trump’s agenda by any means possible: “I Am Part of the Resistance Inside the Trump Administration: I work for the president but like-minded colleagues and I have vowed to thwart parts of his agenda and his worst inclinations.”

The invite came from WALTZ

 

[Lesh]

Maybe. Probably. I suppose there’s some way the government could have a system that archives the messages but I have doubts.

There won’t be any investigation so we never really will know.

Zero accountability.

Waltz set parts of the chat to be deleted in 24 hours and parts to somewhat longer.

Both violations

 

[OldFlame]

The invite came from WALTZ

The invite came from Waltz's account.

 

[Lesh]

The invite came from Waltz's account.

So the account did it all on its own?

And no one on the chat noticed a stranger on that chat ??

 

[JWBooth]

Much ado about nothing.

 

[OldFlame]

So the account did it all on its own?

And no one on the chat noticed a stranger on that chat ??

Didn't we have this conversation before, perhaps your old age is getting to you? Waltz's staffer could have used his account to add him. There were 19 people in the chat, you expected each of them to go thru the whole group to verify who all was in it whenever it was initiated from Waltz's account?

Of course you did.

Why don't you explain why Goldberg wouldn't identify one of the people in the chat?

 

[Lesh]

Didn't we have this conversation before, perhaps your old age is getting to you? Waltz's staffer could have used his account to add him. There were 19 people in the chat, you expected each of them to go thru the whole group to verify who all was in it whenever it was initiated from Waltz's account?

Of course you did.

Why don't you explain why Goldberg wouldn't identify one of the people in the chat?

We did have this discussion and you said the same stupid shit then. You’re trying to claim it was a staffer that invited the reporter… based on nothing

And you ignoring the fact that none of these cretins noticed a stranger on the chat while they discussed war planning .

Yes… they should have noticed that. Especially the Director of National Intelligence who was on the chat

But then… they’re amateurs so…incompetence rules

All your doing is trying to accept the unacceptable

 

[OldFlame]

We did have this discussion and you said the same stupid shit then. You’re trying to claim it was a staffer that invited the reporter… based on nothing

And you ignoring the fact that none of these cretins noticed a stranger on the chat while they discussed war planning .

Yes… they should have noticed that. Especially the Director of National Intelligence who was on the chat

But then… they’re amateurs so…incompetence rules

All your doing is trying to accept the unacceptable

Why should they have noticed, they all have busy lives, and when initiated by one of their own team, they'd have no reason to think that there would be anyone on there that shouldn't. Goldberg is a pig, he had two days to notify them he was on the chat or to remove himself from it, what's his excuse? And now won't release the name of one of the people on the chat, wonder why? I'm sure it's all just a coincidence, right?

 

[Lesh]

Why should they have noticed, they all have busy lives, and when initiated by one of their own team, they'd have no reason to think that there would be anyone on there that shouldn't. Goldberg is a pig, he had two days to notify them he was on the chat or to remove himself from it, what's his excuse? And now won't release the name of one of the people on the chat, wonder why? I'm sure it's all just a coincidence, right?

Too busy to notice a stranger on a chat discussing war plans?

Cause they were thinking about their grocery lists?

Is that REALLY your lame defense?

 

[OldFlame]

Too busy to notice a stranger on a chat discussing war plans?

Cause they were thinking about their grocery lists?

Is that REALLY your lame defense?

Why would I need a defense? I'm not defending anything, I'm stating that most normal people in a secured group chat initiated by a trusted member of their team wouldn't be looking thru the list to see who's in it, which is completely reasonable. You only think it's not because you have to in order to support your hatred for Trump and his admin. Your entire motive is hate driven.

 

[Lesh]

Which Trump officials were in the Signal chat? Here's who was in the group The Atlantic editor was added to

Defenese Secretary Pete Hegseth, national security adviser Mike Waltz and more of the contacts who appeared in the Signal group chat about a U.S. attack on Houthis in Yemen.

www.cbsnews.com

I know of no names that were withheld and. I do note the mention of chat logs

 

[Lesh]

Why would I need a defense? I'm not defending anything, I'm stating that most normal people in a secured group chat initiated by a trusted member of their team wouldn't be looking thru the list to see who's in it, which is completely reasonable. You only think it's not because you have to in order to support your hatred for Trump and his admin. Your entire motive is hate driven.

Really? On a chat discussing war plans?

I guess if YOU are sloppy and incompetent you would expect others to be as well

I have been on dozens of group chats. Never once did I not know who was also on those chats

And HERE? Discussing war plans??

Yeah. Competent people would have noticed

 

[OldFlame]

Really? On a chat discussing war plans?

I guess if YOU are sloppy and incompetent you would expect others to be as well

I have been on dozens of group chats. Never once did I not know who was also on those chats

And HERE? Discussing war plans??

Yeah. Competent people would have noticed

We already know you think Trump and his entire administration is incompetent, why would anyone care what you think? Your opinion is biased, tainted, irrelevant. Deal with it.

 

[Stann]

I agree with you that they shouldnt have been on Signal doing tthis but what “disaster” could this have caused?

The obvious , the loss of military members and their fighter jets. Worse scenario the lies of one of our battleships.

 

[OldFlame]

The obvious , the loss of military members and their fighter jets. Worse scenario the lies of one of our battleships.

You people are whacked, but then again, we already knew that. lol

 

[Couchpotato]

The obvious , the loss of military members and their fighter jets. Worse scenario the lies of one of our battleships.

How? There was nothing in those messages which would have tipped off anyone as to where those jets were going. They could have broadcast that in real time on CNN and it wouldn't have put anyone at risk. That doesn't mean that they should have been putting that on Signal but the hyperbole isn't helpful either.

 

[Lesh]

We already know you think Trump and his entire administration is incompetent, why would anyone care what you think? Your opinion is biased, tainted, irrelevant. Deal with it.

I think that???

Anyone with a brain realizes it after this