The evidence is what was created. It’s the examination of the evidence which informs us.Some guy’s opinion isn’t proof, but you knew that already.Why the caveat?You can't tie the god of the bible to anything.Not at all. Examining the material world and recognizing it isn't an accident that intelligence is built into the fabric of existence. That it is a logical conclusion that intelligence creates intelligence. What isn't logical is believing that the universe popped into existence and created intelligence by accident.General musings, not actual proof. Know the difference."... A few years ago it occurred to me -- albeit with some shock to my scientific sensibilities -- that my two problems, that of a life‑breeding universe, and that of consciousness that can neither be identified nor located, might be brought together. That would be with the thought that mind, rather than being a late development in the evolution of organisms, had existed always: that this is a life‑breeding universe because the constant presence of mind made it so..."I must have missed the part where he scientifically explains god.This is a life‑breeding universe precisely in order eventually to bring forth creatures that ask and attempt to answer such questions.
So agnostics are only looking for the God of Abraham? Look, you can't even put into your own words what you are looking for. No wonder you can't find anything. You don't know what you are looking for.
So again, Professor Wald wasn't making general musing. He examined the material world and recognized that intelligence is built into the fabric of existence. There's your proof. There's your science. You would have me believe that intelligence isn't hardwired into the fabric of existence. You would have me believe it is just random luck that intelligence evolved. I don't have enough faith to believe that.
And as an agnostic you can’t say it is wrong.