- Thread starter
- #21
I think you're overlooking one minor thing, Emily. One side isn't interested in pulling together, they're only interested in killing every one of us. Feel free to try to reason with them and give group hugs if you want. I'll keep an ample supply of ammunition handy.Me too, but try getting them to do it. It ain't gonna happen.Which is always the case. Wake up and smell the coffee.If you do it wrong by leaving people out or pitting one against the other.
Sure I agree S.J. we don't want this abused to oppress or exclude people which is the antithesis.
If you do it right, you teach the benefits and BEST of all cultures.
So if European heritage led to the BEST system of Constitutional govt
you teach that to all the minority groups and political parties so
we all benefit from learning the rules and how to enforce them.
So we don't have abuses, crime or corruption if everyone
knows the rules and how they work to check abuses of power!
S.J. where have we ENCOURAGED black leaders to teach Constitutional
laws the way Ted Cruz teaches and enforces it, even going against his own party when they sell out?
No, our media divides people politically by party and
slams either the Obama's and Pastors on the left as thugs
or the Ben Carson's and Allen West's on the right as Uncle Toms.
That is NOT "inclusion and respecting diversity"
You and I agree on the problem, but we don't agree on the solution.
I say to reverse this divide, we need to UNITE not divide more!
Dear S.J. I think you answer your own question.
If you seek to divide by cutting out other people from the other direction,
then this division is NOT unity.
You cannot create or encourage unity by enforcing division between you and them.
The same reason they fail by cutting you out,
you fail, and I would fail by doing that equally.
That's why we can't bring it about yet.
We'd all have to start pulling together and quit this division
and bullying by coercion or exclusion. Both sides are guilty.
Dear S.J.
This isn't what I mean by pulling together.
You don't treat the criminally ill the same as the law abiding citizen.
Yes, you DO have to distinguish the Jihadist type terrorists
from the law abiding Muslims, and that is NOT dividing in a bad way.
In order to INCLUDE the Muslims with other law abiding citizens
we do need to agree to follow the same standard rules of civil law and due process.
If you prejudge the law abiding Muslims and punish them for the crimes of "other people" who are terrorists
that is violating our OWN laws of due process in "depriving people of liberty" who are not criminals.
Now S.J. this does not mean "political correctness" and letting terrorists in until
proven guilty or we get the same disaster that happened in Florida.
There are MEANS of screening this man out who was "angry and dangerous"
as there were for the Fort Hood shooter that showed signs of danger in advance.
We CAN enforce more effective methods of screening that would have
pegged this man and also the Fort Hood shooter as dangerous
and diverted both of them into counseling. Even if these methods are voluntary, they work,
and have been used to intervene and prevent violence and shootings that unstable people have planned.
You don't have to punish and deprive whole groups of people
in order to screen out dangerous unstable ones who stand out,
and can be identified as needing constant supervision or counseling until the problem is resolved.
We do need more trained screening and assistance with this, but it is out there and practiced by many.
There are many cases of gang and school violence that have been caught early by people taking action
at first sign of trouble, or the troubled persons coming forward when they have someone they trust to help them.