They were not heard because Pelosi changed the rules to allow 0 challenges when they met to certify after the FBI instigated riot. Try the truth.
I never said re-certified, I said investigated. And if that investigation changed the results so be it.
Not possible. The safe harbor date had passed. Electors cant be changed.
The Speaker of the House always controls the rules of the house and has emergency powers to change them. That is what the old hag did.. Try again.
And those electors were chosen before that date or on that date. They were picked if the results changed and were ready to vote in that case.
The fake electors weren’t chosen by the states, which is what matters. The results and therefore electors can’t be changed by the state or anyone else after the safe harbor date.
they are not jurors picked like a trial and the proposed defendant has no say as to the validity of the juror, abandoning the supposed defendant his constitutional rights. It's fking unconstitutional. anti constitutional demfoks who run this shit show are evil and against anything regarding jurisprudence.BS. A grand jury is a jury—a group of citizens—empowered by law to conduct legal proceedings, investigate potential criminal conduct, and determine whether criminal charges should be brought. A grand jury may subpoena physical evidence or a person to testify.
The function of a grand jury is to accuse persons who may be guilty of a crime, but the institution is also a shield against unfounded and oppressive prosecution. It is a means for lay citizens, representative of the community, to participate in the administration of justice. It can also make presentments on crime and maladministration in its area.
The grand jury served to screen out incompetent or malicious prosecutions.[28] The advent of official public prosecutors in the later decades of the 19th century largely displaced private prosecutions.
They do not determine guilt in criminal matters. They hear the evidence presented and have the authority to ask or investigate. Then their task ends either with a finding in favor of charges called a "True Bill" signed by the foreman, or If the indictment is not proven to the satisfaction of the grand jury, the word ignoramus[a] or "not a true bill" is written upon it by the grand jury, or by their foreman and then said to be ignored, and the accusation is dismissed as unfounded; the potential defendant is said to have been "no-billed" by the grand jury.
They do not convict anyone of anything. All US states have provisions for Grand Juries, over half use them.
Grand jury - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
They were chosen by representatives in the state legislature You have no idea what you are talking about..
And the VP will also hear objections and challenges. You have lost this argument troll.
Grand juries aid protecting from frivolous prosecutions, only deciding if there is enough evidence to warrant a prosecution. Nothing unconstitutional about it.
False. There was no vote in the state legislature to chose the fake electors.
December 14, 2020 was the deadline that states had to resolve disputes originated by the declared loser. If a dispute in one state is not resolved by then they risk their Presidential Election results being tossed if not resolved by January 6.
Republicans picked their electors. I do not know why a vote is even necessary. It is party business.
Great. So then you agree they weren’t chosen by the state, which is what actually matters.
A person can be arrested without a grand jury and the evidence presented in a hearing . Why do you hate jurisprudence?
