Is it the continuance of 1% growth? Which will go down once she signs TPP and sends more jobs out of the country
Is it the 550% increase in Muslims from terrorist hot spots? Are you looking forward to more San Bernadino's and Orlando's?
Is it the absolute CORRUPTION in government? I mean she let the maid print classified email maybe she will let some of her most fervent voters print them for her.
Is it opening the border so more illegals can pour in? I mean who doesn't want MORE pressure on our welfare system,medical system,education system and driving down wages even more?
Is it the DOUBLE and TRIPLE digit increases in Obamacare payments? You must really enjoy those eh? So what is it? Afraid of Trump saying mean things but not of the pure hell awaiting us via Clinton? I can tell you right now. I didn't vote for her I won't listen to or heed one damn thing she tells us to in fact I will do everything in my power to destroy her. You wanted an Anti American power hungry thief as president and you get it then don't even think about complaining when half the country has no plans to listen to a damn thing you want done. You elect a criminal well can't complain when people turn criminals themselves to stop her.
People like you are nothing but babbling old goats. None of your assertions have any basis in reality. Cut the crap!
The pure BULLSHIT that's emanating from the far right is pure nonsense. You people just make it up as you go along...you'll say anything!
I'm voting for Clinton because she's a brilliant woman that's devoted her life to public service and she is the most experienced Presidential candidate in recent history. Meanwhile, she's running against the most unqualified major party candidate in the entire U.S. history. Donald trump's candidacy is a sham! He's a spoiled brat with a nasty and unstable personality. He has no business running for President. You have to be either a idiot or hate America to vote for Trump.
Sure, you've bought the party line and actually believe all the BULLSHIT that's been tossed at Clinton. If so, you are a fool.
Dear
Richard-H She is more experienced but relied on a system that censors and excludes
the interests and representation of the rightwing opponents instead of fulfilling and defending
public duty to equally protect all interests of all citizens regardless of belief, creed or political affiliation.
Trump has shown willingness to go after both parties, without the bias the Democrats have
to push their own beliefs and creeds so far as to penalize opponents due to opposing beliefs.
Trump is more willing to respect peers and input from both parties
even aligning with LGBT and Latinos and Blacks not on race or agenda but on
Constitutional principles and solutions that work for all people not just one party's agenda.
How has she excluded the interests of rightwing opponents? Since when have the GOP given a damn about what the liberals want? The right wing has control of congress which, due to gerry-rigging, gives them hugely disproportionate representation.
Right wingers seem to think that anything less than a pure right tyranny amount to persecution.
And thanks to democraps handing out free crap HUGE cities sometimes just 1 huge city controls the ENTIRE state in electoral politics. North Carolina EASILY red if it wasn't for Charlotte and Raleigh,Same goes for almost the entire country. Michigan ALL red except for Detroit,etc etc. You get presidency we get congress and senate to stop your destruction of America. Its time to change the way we elect a president and move to how Nebraska and Maine do it.
Thank you
Odium I looked up how ME and NE split their Electoral College Votes:
Split Electoral Votes in Maine and Nebraska
RWS WillHaftawaite flacaltenn frigidweirdo
If you were going to write letters to Electors in states where it's allowed
asking to split the votes proportionally, would you ask them or
threaten to sue them if they continue censoring and discriminating against voters of other creeds?
Should we propose this positively to educate others?
Or play the media games and threaten to sue and hold huge press conferences.
Is this like the law Rosa Parks challenged to spark the Civil Rights movement,
where the law required her to give up her seat on the bus to a White person who asked.
Are we being 'discriminated against by creed' if the rules require Electors to
vote for the majority candidate and deny equal representation to members of
other political beliefs and creeds? Can we start a movement to recognize the
parties constitute Political Religions and "beliefs" (about right to life,
right to health care, right to prayer, right to marriage, gun rights and voting
rights, right to due process, and immigration/citizenship rights)
and it is discriminatory to abuse govt to impose one creed whille denying
equal protections and inclusion of others?
Should we start a Tea Party movement such as
LGBT Libertarian Green Bipartisan Tea Party
and go ahead and use the current Tea Party and
Green/Libertarian meetings to organize our own
coalitions of party representation and consensus building?