skookerasbil
Platinum Member
The number of scientists, in all fields, who accept AGW as valid, has done nothing but grow. You claim they aren't doing science, yet of the thousands of papers published on the subject, you find a very small handful in which you can find errors. If this were the hoax you claim, a very large portion of those thousands of papers would have to be false. If this were a hoax, there is simply no way that the proportion of scientists accepting AGW could be as high as it is. Your unsubstantiated assertions - and that is all they are - fail the sniff test.
Evidently.......nobody cares >>>>
[URL=http://s42.photobucket.com/user/baldaltima/media/Coalvsrenewables-1.jpg.html]

How can one possibly draw any other conclusion? And EVERY projection out to 2040, including that of the Obama EIA, shows the above graph looking virtually the same!!!




"Errors"......"validity"........"accepting AGW"...............
At the end of the day, I guess a nice little hobby to have.......the climate debate........but its having zero impact in the real world ( as the graph above.......well........ya know


