You've presented no evidence to back your claim.That's you belief. You can jam your beliefs straight up your ass.So you're demanding I watch a 90 minute video you've never bothered to. Strike 1.
Trumps lawyers argue. Not Trump. And they have all pointed out ballot fraud over and over again.That you imagining that Trump will argue fraud in court someday, doesn't change the fact that he never has. Strike 2
His lawyers have.That you imagining that Trump will argue fraud in court someday, doesn't change the fact that he never has.
They babble about fraud in their opening arguments.....but make it VERY clear that they're not actually arguing that any fraud occured as part of their legal arguments.Trumps lawyers argue. Not Trump. And they have all pointed out ballot fraud over and over again.That you imagining that Trump will argue fraud in court someday, doesn't change the fact that he never has. Strike 2
Look at Michigan, for instance.
You're being played.In a recent Pennsylvania federal case, Giuliani alleged “widespread, nationwide voter fraud” in his opening remarks. But under questioning from the judge, he retreated. “This is not a fraud case,” Giuliani later admitted. In the same case, Trump lawyer Linda Kearns said explicitly that she is “not proceeding” on allegations of fraud.
Then it will be remarkably easy for you to show us. Show us Trump's lawyers arguing fraud as part of their legal argument.His lawyers have.That you imagining that Trump will argue fraud in court someday, doesn't change the fact that he never has.
I heard Rudy's closing arguments in Michigan yesterday and his arguments today in Georgia. I think I've figured out what Rudy is up to.They babble about fraud in their opening arguments.....but make it VERY clear that they're not actually arguing that any fraud occured as part of their legal arguments.
Trumps lawyers argue. Not Trump. And they have all pointed out ballot fraud over and over again.That you imagining that Trump will argue fraud in court someday, doesn't change the fact that he never has. Strike 2
Look at Michigan, for instance.
That you imagining that Trump will argue fraud in court someday, doesn't change the fact that he never has.
[/UOTE]
His lawyers have.
Read the citation I provided. You might learn something.If you believe that fraud is part of their legal arguments in Michigan....show us. As I've already demonstrated Trump's claims being contradicted by his own lawyers in court.
You've offered no citation.Trumps lawyers argue. Not Trump. And they have all pointed out ballot fraud over and over again.That you imagining that Trump will argue fraud in court someday, doesn't change the fact that he never has. Strike 2
Look at Michigan, for instance.
That you imagining that Trump will argue fraud in court someday, doesn't change the fact that he never has.
[/UOTE]
His lawyers have.Read the citation I provided. You might learn something.If you believe that fraud is part of their legal arguments in Michigan....show us. As I've already demonstrated Trump's claims being contradicted by his own lawyers in court.
But I doubt it.
I've provided Sidney Powell's reply to leftist fraud and cheating in Michigan.You've offered no citation.
Try again.
If you believe that fraud is part of their legal arguments in Michigan....show us.
Powell isn't Trump's attorney. She's been disavowed by the Trump legal team.I've provided Sidney Powell's reply to leftist fraud and cheating in Michigan.You've offered no citation.
Try again.
If you believe that fraud is part of their legal arguments in Michigan....show us.
If you can't figure things out then fuck you! It's your problem.
Powell is pursuing the same out come as Trump. It's like Eisenhower and Patton in Italy in WW II.Powell isn't Trump's attorney. She's been disavowed by the Trump legal team.
This is the last time I will repeat myself. Read the legal briefs I provided.
[/QUOTE="Skylar, post: 26057576, member: 49869"]
Powell isn't Trump's attorney. She's been disavowed by the Trump legal team.[QUOTE}Show us Trump's lawyers every alleging fraud in any of their legal arguments.Powell is pursuing the same out come as Trump. It's like Eisenhower and Patton in Italy in WW II.
A common enemy tracked down by two differing campaigns. Stop being so fucking stupid..
You can't. As they never have.
You've been played.This is the last time I will repeat myself. Read the legal briefs I provided.
Just more Trumpsters repeating Trump's lies, with zero evidence. Tell a big enough lie often enough and people will believe it. Keep it up, and the Russians and Chinese will appreciate your work discrediting our election process.View attachment 424184The Dominion machines used in Georgia produce a paper ballot for ever vote cast providing a complete audit trail. Those paper ballots were used in the hand audit and in the machine recount.Getting rid of machines that can be manipulated so easily is vital. The Dominion machines were designedAs the the saying goes, "Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything.” Studies of election rigging here and abroad show that large scale fraud that actually affects election results occurs not at the polls but in the counting centers and in the media. If we want to make elections more secure we should should concentrate on ballot counting centers and stopping the disinformation campaigns from domestic and foreign sources. These are the ways elections are actually stolen.
to be vote flipping machines. What should we expect when incredible voting fraud occurs?
Paper ballot block chain voting is the way to go.
You are completely wrong
Let Cynthia McKinney , one of the first victims of electoral fraud in Georgia explain it to you
I checked the facts. There have been 42 lawsuits in about a dozen states attempting to expose voter fraud and failure to follow state regulations. Only one of the 42 cases succeeded, revealing a couple of dozen ballots that were questionable and were referred to the state election commission for investigation. The change in the vote tally was zero. Invariable when eye witnesses of voter fraud were presented, it did not stand up in deposition or court. People saw boxes of ballots being carried to a vote counting room which they claim were fake because they were not brought in through the receiving area but those ballots were conditional ballots that had been pulled for verification and returned when verified. Then there were a large numbers of cars outside a polling place with out of state licenses leading to claims of illegal voters which turns out to be voters from a local college who were registered to vote.Not true according to affidavits provided by many witnesses. There were many instances of people votingYup. And they don't give a shit.
Its why I have zero interest in placating the irrational election deniers: even when their conspiracy is tested and proven wrong, they ignore the evidence and cling to their conspiracy.
You can't use evidence to convince people that have no use for evidence.
over and over again in Domain machines.
Maybe you should check the facts, speaking of people who have no use for evidence.
www.usatoday.com
Pointing out voter fraud and offering no evidence is exactly the technique used in many countries to destroy democrat elections. I never thought it would happen in the US.Trumps lawyers argue. Not Trump. And they have all pointed out ballot fraud over and over again.That you imagining that Trump will argue fraud in court someday, doesn't change the fact that he never has. Strike 2
Look at Michigan, for instance.
His lawyers have.That you imagining that Trump will argue fraud in court someday, doesn't change the fact that he never has.
Your research is all very interesting. Keep everyone posted.I checked the facts. There have been 42 lawsuits in about a dozen states attempting to expose voter fraud and failure to follow state regulations. Only one of the 42 cases succeeded, revealing a couple of dozen ballots that were questionable and were referred to the state election commission for investigation. The change in the vote tally was zero. Invariable when eye witnesses of voter fraud were presented, it did not stand up in deposition or court. People saw boxes of ballots being carried to a vote counting room which they claim were fake because they were not brought in through the receiving area but those ballots were conditional ballots that had been pulled for verification and returned when verified. Then there were a large numbers of cars outside a polling place with out of state licenses leading to claims of illegal voters which turns out to be voters from a local college who were registered to vote.
People that are convinced of wrong doing who look hard enough will usually find something they consider evidence because they are blind to all other possibilities since that is not what they are looking for. In the 42 Trump law suites there has been very little evidence presented and in most cases there was none.
Your claim that no evidence of voter fraud has been presented in this election is just the epitome of uninformed blather or blatant lies being inserted to prop up a candidate who excites or inspires no one at all.Pointing out voter fraud and offering no evidence is exactly the technique used in many countries to destroy democrat elections. I never thought it would happen in the US.
Voter fraud exist but it's rare. This is a crime that just doesn't pay. You can't sell your vote because we have a secret ballot. An organized effort to steal a presidential election would typically require require hundreds of thousands if not millions of votes in most presidential elections. Even if you kept something this big a secret, where is the profit. Politicians are not know for keeping their promises and few political pundits would be willing to take the risk and those that would be so far out in LA LA land, they couldn't be trusted.Your research is all very interesting. Keep everyone posted.I checked the facts. There have been 42 lawsuits in about a dozen states attempting to expose voter fraud and failure to follow state regulations. Only one of the 42 cases succeeded, revealing a couple of dozen ballots that were questionable and were referred to the state election commission for investigation. The change in the vote tally was zero. Invariable when eye witnesses of voter fraud were presented, it did not stand up in deposition or court. People saw boxes of ballots being carried to a vote counting room which they claim were fake because they were not brought in through the receiving area but those ballots were conditional ballots that had been pulled for verification and returned when verified. Then there were a large numbers of cars outside a polling place with out of state licenses leading to claims of illegal voters which turns out to be voters from a local college who were registered to vote.
People that are convinced of wrong doing who look hard enough will usually find something they consider evidence because they are blind to all other possibilities since that is not what they are looking for. In the 42 Trump law suites there has been very little evidence presented and in most cases there was none.
Liberal judges have given Trump no other choice but to declare martial law.It's now 6 million more votes and no state has reversed it's position.
Poor Donald.
