The reason Trump lawyers don't make any specific allegation of fraud is they have no proof to support the claim. Judge's expect to see evidence of allegations and when they don't see it, the lawyer and his case is likely to get a firm rebuke from the judge. This often results in the case being dismissed with prejudice which means that it is dismissed permanently. A case dismissed with prejudice is over and done with, once and for all, and can't be brought back to court. Several of Trump's cases have been dismissed with prejudice. Such cases rarely get reviewed by higher courts.Trump's lawyers aren't even alleging "fraud" in the court filings. And don't trot out that trumped up non-filing by Sydney Powell as "evidence" of what is alleged in court. Show me a document with a signed court receipt and a case file number on it so we can track all of the filings and outcomes on the case.
[bold added for emphasis]
And that's the big tell. Again and again, Trump and his ilk feed his minion stories of fraud. But in court......they aren't arguing fraud occured. The reasons are simple: they can't back that shit with evidence. And lying in court will cost them their licenses.
Lying in a ballroom at the Hyatt Regency though? That's consequence free.
Shut the Fuck up
Fraud is an issue of FACT for a jury.
Federal Law requires that ALL DISPUTES be settled by December 8th, 2020.
How the fuck do you conduct discovery, impanel a jury and present a fraud case and adhere to those deadlines ?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?
There is no fraud and there will be no trial. The SC will not hear this case. Period.