Should we put nukes in South Korea?

[Rigby5]

Nuclear missiles are very different than nuclear bombers.
Missiles are so much faster, they are much harder to stop, and they can't be recalled if launch was a mistake even.
So it is unethical to the point of criminal, to put nuclear missiles up close.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

China already feels threatened by our military being in SK. Now you want to intentionally threaten them with nukes? I bet if we offered to leave SK they'd agree to reign in NK. That won't happen though because at the end of all things we are the overzealous warmongers that won't stand for our military not being positioned right outside of everybody's anus.

South Korea does not want our nukes, they have made that clear.

 

[Timmy]

Why would NK give up their nukes ?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Why would NK give up their nukes ?

maybe the better question is even why should they?

 

[Ambivalent1]

China already feels threatened by our military being in SK. Now you want to intentionally threaten them with nukes? I bet if we offered to leave SK they'd agree to reign in NK. That won't happen though because at the end of all things we are the overzealous warmongers that won't stand for our military not being positioned right outside of everybody's anus.

South Korea does not want our nukes, they have made that clear.

Maybe, maybe not. The SK's manicure the graves of our dead with scissors. IF we want Nukes there they'll take them

 

[Timmy]

Why would NK give up their nukes ?

maybe the better question is even why should they?

They have enemies everywhere. They’ve been under attack for 100yrs .

You think Isreal has a persecution complex ?

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

No

Dumb idea

 

[Harpy Eagle]

China already feels threatened by our military being in SK. Now you want to intentionally threaten them with nukes? I bet if we offered to leave SK they'd agree to reign in NK. That won't happen though because at the end of all things we are the overzealous warmongers that won't stand for our military not being positioned right outside of everybody's anus.

South Korea does not want our nukes, they have made that clear.

Maybe, maybe not. The SK's manicure the graves of our dead with scissors. IF we want Nukes there they'll take them

you are a ******* moron. You probably could not find SK on map, let alone spent any time there.

They will not take them, the people do not want them and the leaders do not want them,

you just might be the dumbest person on this forum

 

[2aguy]

The unnamed impediment to US-NK nuclear negotiations is China, which views NK as a potential bargaining chip in its own negotiatons with the US. Without China's concurrence, NK has little reason to give up its nukes.

The only way to get China to support denuclearizing NK is to turn the tables on them by placing nuclear missiles in SK that are capable of reaching China itself. Just as the Soviets removed their nuclear missiles from Eastern Europe after Reagan ordered ours to be placed in Western Europe, the Chinese would come to the same conclusion about NK.

After all, SK is a lot closed to China that NK is to the US. Thoughts?

Japan...they need to rearm today...

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Why would NK give up their nukes ?

maybe the better question is even why should they?

They have enemies everywhere. They’ve been under attack for 100yrs .

You think Isreal has a persecution complex ?

what happened to the last country that gave up their nukes at our insistence?

 

[Timmy]

Why would NK give up their nukes ?

maybe the better question is even why should they?

They have enemies everywhere. They’ve been under attack for 100yrs .

You think Isreal has a persecution complex ?

what happened to the last country that gave up their nukes at our insistence?

Who’s ever given up their nukes ?

 

[The VOR]

Why would NK give up their nukes ?

I don't see what the big deal is. According to the moron-in-chief, North Korea isn't a nuclear threat anymore.

 

[bodecea]

The unnamed impediment to US-NK nuclear negotiations is China, which views NK as a potential bargaining chip in its own negotiatons with the US. Without China's concurrence, NK has little reason to give up its nukes.

The only way to get China to support denuclearizing NK is to turn the tables on them by placing nuclear missiles in SK that are capable of reaching China itself. Just as the Soviets removed their nuclear missiles from Eastern Europe after Reagan ordered ours to be placed in Western Europe, the Chinese would come to the same conclusion about NK.

After all, SK is a lot closed to China that NK is to the US. Thoughts?

You don't think they're there already?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Why would NK give up their nukes ?

maybe the better question is even why should they?

They have enemies everywhere. They’ve been under attack for 100yrs .

You think Isreal has a persecution complex ?

what happened to the last country that gave up their nukes at our insistence?

Who’s ever given up their nukes ?

Libya under Muammar Gaddafi.

Lets just say it did not work out very well for him.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

The unnamed impediment to US-NK nuclear negotiations is China, which views NK as a potential bargaining chip in its own negotiatons with the US. Without China's concurrence, NK has little reason to give up its nukes.

The only way to get China to support denuclearizing NK is to turn the tables on them by placing nuclear missiles in SK that are capable of reaching China itself. Just as the Soviets removed their nuclear missiles from Eastern Europe after Reagan ordered ours to be placed in Western Europe, the Chinese would come to the same conclusion about NK.

After all, SK is a lot closed to China that NK is to the US. Thoughts?

You don't think they're there already?

no, they are not

 

[Darkwind]

China already feels threatened by our military being in SK. Now you want to intentionally threaten them with nukes? I bet if we offered to leave SK they'd agree to reign in NK. That won't happen though because at the end of all things we are the overzealous warmongers that won't stand for our military not being positioned right outside of everybody's anus.

If we agreed to leave SK, the Chicoms would crow to the world that they defeated the United States, immediately invade SK, move their nuclear arsenal to the coastline and threaten Japan.

Do not ever think that the Chicoms would be civilized or rational or hold to any western value.

 

[Confounding]

China already feels threatened by our military being in SK. Now you want to intentionally threaten them with nukes? I bet if we offered to leave SK they'd agree to reign in NK. That won't happen though because at the end of all things we are the overzealous warmongers that won't stand for our military not being positioned right outside of everybody's anus.

If we agreed to leave SK, the Chicoms would crow to the world that they defeated the United States, immediately invade SK, move their nuclear arsenal to the coastline and threaten Japan.

Do not ever think that the Chicoms would be civilized or rational or hold to any western value.

I really don't think they're that dumb. They would lose, badly. We could have military forces back in Korea within 12 hours and they know it.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

The unnamed impediment to US-NK nuclear negotiations is China, which views NK as a potential bargaining chip in its own negotiatons with the US. Without China's concurrence, NK has little reason to give up its nukes.

The only way to get China to support denuclearizing NK is to turn the tables on them by placing nuclear missiles in SK that are capable of reaching China itself. Just as the Soviets removed their nuclear missiles from Eastern Europe after Reagan ordered ours to be placed in Western Europe, the Chinese would come to the same conclusion about NK.

After all, SK is a lot closed to China that NK is to the US. Thoughts?

You don't think they're there already?

What makes you think there are?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

China already feels threatened by our military being in SK. Now you want to intentionally threaten them with nukes? I bet if we offered to leave SK they'd agree to reign in NK. That won't happen though because at the end of all things we are the overzealous warmongers that won't stand for our military not being positioned right outside of everybody's anus.

If we agreed to leave SK, the Chicoms would crow to the world that they defeated the United States, immediately invade SK, move their nuclear arsenal to the coastline and threaten Japan.

Do not ever think that the Chicoms would be civilized or rational or hold to any western value.

I really don't think they're that dumb. They would lose, badly. We could have military forces back in Korea within 12 hours and they know it.

I'd really like to hear your fantasy about how that would happen.

 

[Ambivalent1]

Why would NK give up their nukes ?

maybe the better question is even why should they?

They have enemies everywhere. They’ve been under attack for 100yrs .

You think Isreal has a persecution complex ?

what happened to the last country that gave up their nukes at our insistence?

Who’s ever given up their nukes ?

Kdaffy duck did, them Hitlery killed him.