Should Saudi Arabia compensate the United States for 9/11?

Should Saudi Arabia compensate the United States for 9/11?

  • Yes.

    Votes: 4 66.7%
  • No.

    Votes: 2 33.3%

  • Total voters
    6

Sallow

The Big Bad Wolf.
Joined
Oct 4, 2010
Messages
56,532
Reaction score
6,241
Points
1,840
Location
New York City
It's becoming increasingly clear that the Saudi government had direct involvement with the 9/11 attacks. George W. Bush tried like the dickens to cover that up. From scrubbing an entire chapter from the 9/11 commission report to the attack on Iraq.

It's far to late to attack Saudi Arabia for many reasons. Perhaps in the future, a Libyan style over throw of the terrorist supporters would be possible. But now?

America is cash strapped and partly due to the 9/11 attacks. The Saudis had a hand in funding and planning it.

Is it time to them to cough up some money?
 

High_Gravity

Belligerent Drunk
Joined
Nov 19, 2010
Messages
40,159
Reaction score
7,084
Points
260
Location
Richmond VA
They will never do it because if they give us money for that thats basically admitting they had a hand in it.
 

High_Gravity

Belligerent Drunk
Joined
Nov 19, 2010
Messages
40,159
Reaction score
7,084
Points
260
Location
Richmond VA
I believe you, but the Saudi government will never come out and admit they had a hand in it.
 

SFC Ollie

Still Marching
Joined
Oct 21, 2009
Messages
28,917
Reaction score
7,555
Points
255
Location
Extreme East Ohio
A wiki article that proves nothing? I'll wait for real proof before condemning one of our few allies in the ME.
 
OP
Sallow

Sallow

The Big Bad Wolf.
Joined
Oct 4, 2010
Messages
56,532
Reaction score
6,241
Points
1,840
Location
New York City
A wiki article that proves nothing? I'll wait for real proof before condemning one of our few allies in the ME.
They aren't an "ally".

And just where do you think the Bin Ladens were from? As well as most of the Terrorists that were involved in the operation?
 

Mr Clean

Gold Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2009
Messages
16,005
Reaction score
4,002
Points
290
A wiki article that proves nothing? I'll wait for real proof before condemning one of our few allies in the ME.
I wouldn't count any barbaric regime that condones the stoning deaths of women for minor infractions to be "allies".
 

High_Gravity

Belligerent Drunk
Joined
Nov 19, 2010
Messages
40,159
Reaction score
7,084
Points
260
Location
Richmond VA
A wiki article that proves nothing? I'll wait for real proof before condemning one of our few allies in the ME.
I wouldn't count any barbaric regime that condones the stoning deaths of women for minor infractions to be "allies".
I don't consider them any "ally" either, our arrangement with them is more business than anything else.
 

SFC Ollie

Still Marching
Joined
Oct 21, 2009
Messages
28,917
Reaction score
7,555
Points
255
Location
Extreme East Ohio
It's simple. Yes most of the hijackers were Saudi. Usama Bin Laden was not. His citizenship had been removed and his family disowned him years before. Saudi Arabia is still an Allie, granted not the best of Allies but I would trust them before I would trust Pakistan.

I have seen no proof that their Government had anything to do with attacks against the USA. Other than financial attacks........But that's business........
 

CMike

Zionist, proud to be
Joined
Oct 25, 2009
Messages
9,219
Reaction score
1,171
Points
190
There is no proof.

What some people suspect is not proof.
 

CMike

Zionist, proud to be
Joined
Oct 25, 2009
Messages
9,219
Reaction score
1,171
Points
190
A wiki article that proves nothing? I'll wait for real proof before condemning one of our few allies in the ME.
They aren't an "ally".

And just where do you think the Bin Ladens were from? As well as most of the Terrorists that were involved in the operation?
Just because some of them were born in saudi Arabia, doesn't mean they acted with the approval of the government.
 
OP
Sallow

Sallow

The Big Bad Wolf.
Joined
Oct 4, 2010
Messages
56,532
Reaction score
6,241
Points
1,840
Location
New York City
A wiki article that proves nothing? I'll wait for real proof before condemning one of our few allies in the ME.
They aren't an "ally".

And just where do you think the Bin Ladens were from? As well as most of the Terrorists that were involved in the operation?
Just because some of them were born in saudi Arabia, doesn't mean they acted with the approval of the government.
Oh they did.

And why did the Bush administration purge a whole chapter from the 9/11 commission report?

Oh yeah.

Because it condemned the Saudis.
 

SFC Ollie

Still Marching
Joined
Oct 21, 2009
Messages
28,917
Reaction score
7,555
Points
255
Location
Extreme East Ohio
They aren't an "ally".

And just where do you think the Bin Ladens were from? As well as most of the Terrorists that were involved in the operation?
Just because some of them were born in saudi Arabia, doesn't mean they acted with the approval of the government.
Oh they did.

And why did the Bush administration purge a whole chapter from the 9/11 commission report?

Oh yeah.

Because it condemned the Saudis.
You know, you saying it doesn't make it true. First show us that Bush did indeed purge the report then prove to us what it was that he allegedly purged.

Opinion is nothing but that.
 

CMike

Zionist, proud to be
Joined
Oct 25, 2009
Messages
9,219
Reaction score
1,171
Points
190
They aren't an "ally".

And just where do you think the Bin Ladens were from? As well as most of the Terrorists that were involved in the operation?
Just because some of them were born in saudi Arabia, doesn't mean they acted with the approval of the government.
Oh they did.

And why did the Bush administration purge a whole chapter from the 9/11 commission report?

Oh yeah.

Because it condemned the Saudis.
Prove it.
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top