beautress
Always Faithful
I don't have an answer for all the points you cover, Wiggle Piggy, but I'll take a shot at your title, "Should men and women be considered completely and absolutely by all measures, "equal?"Men and women, when measured in mass, have extremely different bodily functions, thus different biological psychologies, and thus when left to their own choices... have significantly different outcomes.
Is it right to attempt to socially engineer those differences out of existance? And if those attempts create horrible results, is it moral to continue to push?
The data/polls seem to say that single, successful women are overall decreasing in happiness. The leftist view of women partaking in the male behavior of transactionally-sexual, and being used as a sex object appears to be un-fulfilling to women in the long run.
Yet, the feminist movement continues to push for women to follow their immediate urges to be rammed through while they have their youth, in their prime... which harms their value to quality value men, who seek chastity.
Unless you're ignorant of the mass data... men and women generally seek different things in partners. Women seek a provider, someone who can offer resources, security, and leadership. Men seek women who are agreeable, physically attractive, kind, and supportive. These have been established roles acrossed nearly all historical cultures throughout the globe... it's biological based on sex.
Modern third-wave feminism is trying to convince women to suppress this natural urge... to take on masculinity, and obsess about being providers... to be disagreeable and try to aggressively overcompensate to positions of leadership even if unnecessary.
This convinces women to actually become unattractive to men, as men aren't attracted to women who assume uber-masculine traits.
Then.. these women go on social media, or all media, and complain that there's no good men out there. No, there's plenty of good men, it's just that third-wave-feminists view men as antagonists rather than in a historical manner of trying to find a mate/partner they can support. Feminism is causing massive sorrow to women, who find out too late that the drive/career they were convinced by our society they wanted doesn't deliver the happiness they were promised. Behavioral psychology dictates that overall children/family make both males/females happier later in life, but espeically females.
Yet, major media/celebrities continue to convince youthful women to "not settle' and go out and F as many people as they please.. and to "Slay Queen!" (and if you have children, have the sacrament of abortion!). This acts completely against behavioral psychology, and sadly only accomadates the worst of men. While men are capable of restrictive emotion sex, women aren't nearly as able.. and it leads to depression and the feeling of being used.
But the drive for sex pushes onward on the left. They want to F now, and not worry about the results, because they feel judged. The truth is, Ms. "I feel judged" Feminist".. if you want to be whore, go ahead.. but don't try to convince young girls to follow you. It's not virtuous, and it will likely lead them to sorrow and despair. Please grow up and be an adult, Ms. angry feminist.
No, and here's why: Men are in the most general of ways bigger than women. Guys have hormones that make their muscles strong, whereas women have hormones that, generally accommodates tolerance caring for children and family. Men also care for children and family, but in a different way--to provide necessities for living by way of making a living that provides for the woman in the family to purchase groceries which she then cooks to feed the family group, make or buy clothes or materials that can be used for nightwear and work-a-day clothes.The freedoms we have in our country can reverse roles by agreement or sluggin' it out. (giggle) And that's what i think.